All Seeing Eye
Admiral
If we built a huge drill and started drilling vertically into the Earth how deep could we potentially go? could we go as far down as the mantle in order to tap the heat for power?
Geothermal heat pumps for private homes reach down a few hundred feet.
When we build new homes why are we not drilling huge holes into the ground to tap into the heat for the houses? We'd have no more reason to need natural gas to warm our central heating.
Oil companies would probably be very interested in deriving additional revenue from those platforms considering their massive expense. I wonder how you'd transport the power fomr some of those great distances.Oil rigs in the North Sea are on the continental shelf where the Earth's crust is thin (less than 10 kilometres). I've heard that these oil rigs can (when the oil runs out) be converted into Geothermal power plants. They can drill into the Earth below the north sea and tap the geothermal power there.
I hope this turns out to be the case.
At what point do we hit magma. Or does that just occur in pockets below fault lines around tectonic plates?
Well, mostly price. It's cost-effective with a reasonable pay-back period in some areas (Iceland, the areas of BC with lots of hot-springs, etc), and it's somewhat common there.Geothermal heat pumps for private homes reach down a few hundred feet.
So we can drill down 7.5 miles but a few hundred feet is adequate for heat pumps for homes?
When we build new homes why are we not drilling huge holes into the ground to tap into the heat for the houses? We'd have no more reason to need natural gas to warm our central heating.
Well I can't speak for we but here in Norway heat pumps have become common over the past decade. It is an investment, but perfectly doable for people with the money to buy a house and pays off in 5 years.
I'm not sure a cable is the best way to do that. Aren't some of them several hundred miles from land? That's a long way to run a cable to carry that much electricity. Also, undersea cables are frequently cut by ship anchors or geological events, or other such stuff. Such damage to a cable carrying a large electric current could be very bad.Well I suppose if they connected all the platforms together by undersea cables and then had a single cable running to the mainland it would save money laying cables because there'd be less cable. But Geothermal would be a never ending supply, for as long as the Earth exists power could be tapped from the North Sea so the price of the cables would be irrelevant because the money to be gained from the geothermal power would easily pay for it. Of course power would be lost over the distances needed to travel but power should still reach the mainland in large enough quantities.
I think a better idea would be to use the energy on site to hydrolyze sea water to produce hydrogen, then transport the hydrogen to land. The hydrogen could then be used to produce electricity through combustion or in fuel cells.
Transporting hydrogen is not that easy either.I'm not sure a cable is the best way to do that. Aren't some of them several hundred miles from land? That's a long way to run a cable to carry that much electricity. Also, undersea cables are frequently cut by ship anchors or geological events, or other such stuff. Such damage to a cable carrying a large electric current could be very bad.Well I suppose if they connected all the platforms together by undersea cables and then had a single cable running to the mainland it would save money laying cables because there'd be less cable. But Geothermal would be a never ending supply, for as long as the Earth exists power could be tapped from the North Sea so the price of the cables would be irrelevant because the money to be gained from the geothermal power would easily pay for it. Of course power would be lost over the distances needed to travel but power should still reach the mainland in large enough quantities.
I think a better idea would be to use the energy on site to hydrolyze sea water to produce hydrogen, then transport the hydrogen to land. The hydrogen could then be used to produce electricity through combustion or in fuel cells.
Transporting hydrogen is not that easy either.
Emphasis mineIn 2007 Dupont and others reported hydrogen-storage materials based on imidazolium ionic liquids. Simple alkyl(aryl)-3-methylimidazolium N-bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imidate salts that possess very low vapour pressure, high density, and thermal stability and are not inflammable can add reversibly 6-12 hydrogen atoms in the presence of classical Pd/C or Ir0 nanoparticle catalysts and can be used as alternative materials for on-board hydrogen-storage devices. These salts can hold up to 30 g / L of hydrogen at atmospheric pressure, which is twice that compressed hydrogen gas can attain at 350 atm.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.