Sometimes you just have to get over it and move on.
And sometimes you have to speak up and protest it publicly.
Sometimes you just have to get over it and move on.
Five years is totally unacceptable, just as it is totally unacceptable that Voyager characters are used as minor characters in other books
WTF? Some random person. woo hoo now I really want to buy the books!Okay, spoliers abound...
Following the destruction of the Borg in the Destiny trilogy, Voyager leads a fleet of nine Federation starships on a three-year mission into the Delta Quadrant. The ships have been upgraded with slipstream drive. Among them are science, medical, and exploratory vessels. The fleet commander is Admiral Willem Batiste. Voyager is the flagship and its new CO is Captain Afsarah Eden, the former wife of Admiral Batiste. Paris, Kim, Vorik, the Doctor, and Seven accompany the mission. B'Elanna and her daughter join them as well. And contrary to rumors, Chakotay is not dead.
just as it is totally unacceptable that Voyager characters are used as minor characters in other books
Sometimes you just have to get over it and move on.
And sometimes you have to speak up and protest it publicly.
Sometimes you just have to get over it and move on.
And sometimes you have to speak up and protest it publicly.
Are you kidding?
Who is Captain Afsarah Eden?
Why are they going back to the Delta Quadrant?
Why is Chakotay dead (a story I haven't read so far)?
If it's true, that hardly any original characters appear as main stars in the novels, I also think that the Star Trek: Voyager relaunch can be stopped at all. Like someone put in here: We care more about the characters than about the ship itself.
I can't imagine anyone spending time going to a place specifically designed to fulfill that sort of need and then spending all their time protesting a creative decision from someone that clearly isn't listening or interested in changing their mind. It's inane.
But then people keep posting that they're "protesting" this like it's some kind of huge injustice, and it gets on my nerves.
I can't imagine anyone spending time going to a place specifically designed to fulfill that sort of need and then spending all their time protesting a creative decision from someone that clearly isn't listening or interested in changing their mind. It's inane.
The irony is that, while that may be true, it is equally ridiculous to continue to argue the opposing viewpoint with those fans who are also clearly not listening or interested in changing their minds.
I can understand that completely. But this was meant to be a poll about should Janeway be brought back. This poll is one of the kind so far, so I think there is a room for it on this board. It is another matter entirely to which directions discussions continue to develop.
No one cares about your Patricia and Nik on Trek board, I'm afraid.
If you don't want to post on Janeway threads, don't. It's one way of "killing a thread", you know, not contributing.![]()
No one cares about your Patricia and Nik on Trek board, I'm afraid.
If you don't want to post on Janeway threads, don't. It's one way of "killing a thread", you know, not contributing.![]()
I don't know Patricia or Nik but I find your posts thoughtful and balanced - even though I don't always agree with you.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.