Nor was it intended to detract from that debate- it was about other parts of the thread. If you thought I was defending the cover, I don't know why- I have no opinion on it, and didn't offer one.Sure but that doesn't detract from the fact that the cover as presented is a really really poor hack job
Yes, it is, which is why I never said anything about the merits of the book either. I replied to the person who said that the cover might be being reworked by saying that indeed it was, and mentioned that people, including the thread starter, who assumed the cover might be a literal image were mistaken.nobody has even touched on the merits of the book, it's irrelevant to the discussion as it's developed
Last edited: