• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

A specific question regarding "Resistance"

The idea of all Starfleet ships having access to a cloak schematics is a bad one for this reason: Now everytime the readers know it would make sense to use one and it ISN'T used it will just make the characters look stupid.

I realize there was something about asking permission to use it if I remember correctly. But we haven't seen anyone ask since then and I doubt we will often them ask in the future. Thus it reeks of a one off, a Voyager esque type "well we magically have/can do this once but we won't do it again even when we're all about to die" type of thing.

Same thing goes for the E-E having saucer seperation capabilities, which was always a lame idea when when the D did it. It makes the ships seem too toy-like. Also it was my understanding that the E-E wasn't really all about the whole family thing like the D was.
 
The idea of all Starfleet ships having access to a cloak schematics is a bad one for this reason: Now everytime the readers know it would make sense to use one and it ISN'T used it will just make the characters look stupid.

Uhh, no, it will make them look like they're following orders. More precisely, it will make them look like they're not committing a federal crime by forging the Admiralty-level authorization codes they'd need to access the locked files.

I realize there was something about asking permission to use it if I remember correctly. But we haven't seen anyone ask since then and I doubt we will often them ask in the future. Thus it reeks of a one off, a Voyager esque type "well we magically have/can do this once but we won't do it again even when we're all about to die" type of thing.

No, it's a "This is something that Starfleet regulations and interstellar treaties forbid and we can't get an Admiral's authorization to override those regulations unless the security of the entire Federation is at stake" type of thing.

Besides, are there really that many cases where a cloaking device would be a magic bullet to save a ship from imminent destruction? If they're already under attack, they wouldn't have time to install and activate a cloaking mechanism. And probably a key part of the reason why the UFP agreed to the treaty barring them from developing cloaks is that cloaks don't generally work well with Starfleet-type vessels. The more power you generate, the more power it takes to cloak your ship, so there's a point of diminishing returns. Cloaks are really only practical on stripped-down, bare-bones ships like a Klingon bird of prey or the Defiant. Something like the E-E, with its large crew and science labs and recreation facilities and all that, would be too much of an energy hog to be practically cloaked in most situations. Probably the only reason the Borg didn't see them through the cloak is because the Borg didn't know what to look for, being reactive rather than anticipatory by nature.


Also it was my understanding that the E-E wasn't really all about the whole family thing like the D was.

It's erroneous to assume that the purpose saucer separation served on the E-D is the only possible purpose it can serve. As mentioned in an earlier post, the concept of saucer separation goes all the way back to TOS, where it was an emergency measure. The idea was to use the saucer as a lifeboat, and if necessary a landing craft, if the engineering section had to be abandoned due to imminent containment failure or the like (ironically, pretty much the way the E-D saucer was used in Generations). Perhaps the E-E's separation function is meant for a similar purpose.

Anyway, if you have a problem with saucer sep on the E-E, then your problem is with John Eaves, not J.M. Dillard.
 
I have to disagree with you on this one Christopher.

Following orders? How many times have we seen Captains bend or disobey orders from an Admiral? If there is a case where the ship could be saved by using a cloak are you telling me that somebody like Picard wouldn't use the option? And the idea of all of the ships having these schematics, building a cloaking device when given permission and then disassembling it...I just find it silly. Either give the ships cloaking devices or don't. It really hasn't made much sense for a long time now that Starfleet ships don't use them. What kind of maniacs decide to abandon a valuable weapon that one of their main enemies possess because their enemy doesn't like the idea? And this has been going on for so incredibly long now. We know the real reason for this is Gene's "bad guys don't hide" idea, which was thrown out the window on DS9 anyway. With the Romulan Empire being split up and the Federation in shambles it makes sense to start using them now. But let's say that the Federation just doesn't want to use them and don't want to piss off the Romulans..how long are the Romulans going to remain ignorant of the fact that EVERY ship has the ability to make a cloaking device whenever they want to, but just aren't doing so? That should anger the Romulans just as much as them having acting cloaking devices installed. The Romulans aren't stupid. The Feds are violating the treaty already.

Here is the thing, situations are going to come up in future books where it will be obvious that a cloaking device would be helpful and it would be obvious to ask permission to use one. Especially since huge threats against the Federation and the galaxy itself are rather commonplace in the Trek verse.
Even if only a tiny amount of them warrant the use of a cloak, I'm willing to bet that we won't see people asking to use them when we know it would be logical to ask.

On the saucer sep. thing, that really isn't a huge deal. I've just never cared for the idea and I'm sorry that it has been brought back when I thought we were rid of it.
 
Assuming the cloak was always an option: Voyager should have installed the cloak on day one of their journey home (or, at least, once they had regained contact with starfleet and could get the codes from the admiralty).
 
Last edited:
I have to disagree with you on this one Christopher.

Following orders? How many times have we seen Captains bend or disobey orders from an Admiral? If there is a case where the ship could be saved by using a cloak are you telling me that somebody like Picard wouldn't use the option?

He couldn't. You have to contact the Admiralty and get an authorization code from them.

Besides, it's a myth that starship captains violate orders routinely or cavalierly. No officer who couldn't find solutions within the law and the chain of command would be allowed to remain a captain long, or even get there at all. Captains may interpret regulations flexibly when the situation requires it, but violating direct orders -- let alone falsifying an Admiralty command code -- goes way beyond that. You're talking about something that Picard did when the fate of the Federation was at stake as though it were a precedent for how to behave in a routine crisis, and that's hugely discommensurate.

It would also be a stupid risk to take for something as lame as a cloaking device. Why are you so convinced that a cloaking device is a magic cure to every problem? It's a very limiting technology at best -- a ship under cloak can't use its main shields, its weapons, its active sensors, its communications, etc., nor can it use its engines or other systems at full power without risking signal leakage. It's only useful in certain situations. And we've seen types of cloak that didn't even work perfectly anyway, such as the "Balance of Terror" Romulan cloak which didn't fool motion sensors, the Search for Spock Klingon cloak that caused a visible distortion in the starfield, the Undiscovered Country cloak that was betrayed by the ship's engine exhaust, etc. So I don't understand your perception of it as a magic fix for getting a starship out of a life-and-death crisis.

And the idea of all of the ships having these schematics, building a cloaking device when given permission and then disassembling it...I just find it silly. Either give the ships cloaking devices or don't.

Starship computer banks no doubt have the data on the genetic code for the bubonic plague, but do you think that starships should carry it and use it routinely as a bioweapon? You're confusing information with substance, and confusing existence with value.


It really hasn't made much sense for a long time now that Starfleet ships don't use them.

Did you bother to read the entirety of my last post? I already explained why it's impractical for most Starfleet ships to use them. It's a technology whose only practical use is by a stripped-down warship or espionage vessel. It's not magic. Okay, sure, it's still a complete physical impossibility that violates the laws of thermodynamics, but at least ST tries to make some concessions to common sense by establishing that cloaking devices have only a limited capability to mask a ship's energy output, and only when a ship is using very little energy for anything besides the cloak. A high-powered, multifunction starship like the Enterprise (any one of them) just wouldn't be very well concealed by a cloak.

What kind of maniacs decide to abandon a valuable weapon that one of their main enemies possess because their enemy doesn't like the idea?

Uhh, how does a thing that lets you hide qualify as a "weapon?" It's a strategic asset, yes, but that's not what the word "weapon" means. Besides, what's so valuable about it anyway? How many times have we seen Starfleet figure out how to penetrate one type of cloak, only for a new type to be developed later on and then penetrated in turn? Any given cloaking technology is only going to be useful for a little while until the enemy figures out how to pierce it, and then the whole cycle starts all over again. If you ask me, the Federation was wise to avoid getting trapped into that cycle, saving its resources for other technologies.


We know the real reason for this is Gene's "bad guys don't hide" idea, which was thrown out the window on DS9 anyway.

I think you meant to say "good guys don't hide." Anyway, as I've explained, it makes sense in-universe regardless of the metatextual reasons for it.

..how long are the Romulans going to remain ignorant of the fact that EVERY ship has the ability to make a cloaking device whenever they want to, but just aren't doing so? That should anger the Romulans just as much as them having acting cloaking devices installed. The Romulans aren't stupid. The Feds are violating the treaty already.

I've already explained why this is wrong in every particular. You're not engaging in a dialogue with me, you're just ignoring what I say and restating your original points. So is there any point in actually trying to respond to you?
 
Yeah, but according to another Okudagram, there's a gerbil on a treadmill in the engineering section. :D
 
If viewscreen graphics were canonical down to every detail, that would mean the Enterprise-D had a giant rubber ducky, a giant hamster in a wheel, and a giant Nomad probe as part of its complement. MSDs aren't meant to be gospel fact; they're just put together by the art department to look good onscreen. Their details have been contradicted by actual events before; for instance, Voyager's MSD depicts a backup warp core in storage, but in VGR episodes where the warp core was ejected or lost, it was always assumed it was the only core they had and couldn't be replaced.

And it would hardly be the first time we've gotten conflicting information about the same starship. The TMP rec room and corridor leading into engineering couldn't possibly fit within the design of the ship. Ten Forward couldn't fit within the original 6-foot or 2-foot E-D miniatures built by ILM, because they were designed based on Andrew Probert's assumption that the outer rim of the saucer was only one deck thick; the later Greg Jein model has a saucer rim that's twice as thick in proportion, and since old and new footage were used interchangably throughout TNG, the shape of the saucer isn't even consistent with itself. Much like the way TOS constantly switched between new footage of the series Enterprise miniature with swirly, unspired nacelle caps and stock footage of the pilot E with dark, spired nacelle caps. Even clearly visible information about the design of starships is often flawed and contradictory. So something like an MSD, that isn't meant to be seen in detail, can't be taken as irrefutable fact.
 
If viewscreen graphics were canonical down to every detail, that would mean the Enterprise-D had a giant rubber ducky, a giant hamster in a wheel, and a giant Nomad probe as part of its complement.

I demand a novel featuring all of these elements! :)
 
If viewscreen graphics were canonical down to every detail, that would mean the Enterprise-D had a giant rubber ducky, a giant hamster in a wheel, and a giant Nomad probe as part of its complement.

I demand a novel featuring all of these elements! :)


LAFORGE "It's no use captain, Dr. Crusher was unable to revive the giant hamster in sickbay. Without that hamster we have no power, and without power we can't escape the black hole."

WES: "*sigh* totally hopeless"

LAFORGE: Wait a sec. *grabs 24th cent. tape-measure* Hold still Wes.

WES: "Oh fu--"

LAFORGE: "Enginering to the bridge, belay that last report... I may have a solution here. Stand by." *muffled thump, much yelling and cursing*


:D

Ok someone work in the other elements. :D
 
Of course all Federation starships have secret cloaking devices! The files have been there all along, they're in the folder named "Deus Ex Machina".
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top