John and Mary? That's old school, even older school than me. I'm hoping for Eben and Sarah Kent to return.Does this mean that poor John and Mary Kent have to die and/or get re-named again?![]()
First of all, I'm frankly stunned by the cynicism and bitterness of some of you fanboys here. Yes, there have been two "reboots" to Superman's origin since 1985's Crisis on Infinite Earths. Byrne's was necessary, if ill-conceived (he's admitted this himself a few times, esp. because of the loss of Superboy) and the second, Birthright, was ill-planned and ill-timed. As a life-long Superman fan and comic book reader, I am thrilled about this new origin. Despite what Christopher said, it will indeed deal with Krypton, specifically, the aftermath of Brainiac's "removal" of Kandor and how the planet reacted to the loss of its capital city. It will also serve to re-introduce Superboy, since the legal fiasco that led to "Superman Prime" and the animated "Superman and the Legion of Super-Heroes" is now settled.
Grott?
Which is fine. I like having Earth-2 back.the goal of the last few years, even despite some big misfires, was to restore a Multiverse,
This was, IMHO, a mistake. These had become legacy heroes -- Connor Hawke became Green Arrow, Kyle Rayner became Green Lantern. Green Lantern especially didn't need Hal Jordan to return. Don't misunderstand, I like Hal. But Hal's day was done, and now DC doesn't have a clue what to do with Kyle.a great deal of the Silver Age continuity (i.e., Ollie Queen and Hal Jordan)
Many of the decisions regarding the Legion in 1989 and 1994 stemmed from DC's decision to have Byrne remove Superboy from continuity. While the 1989's reboot was unfortunate (they rebooted the 30th century twice in the span of three issues as Glorith's magic rewrote history), it created what's probably my favorite Legion period -- Five Years Later. I'd grown up with these characters, and now they were adults, dealing with serious problems, while training a new generation of heroes. I loved it. Now, that's the red-headed stepchild of Legion continuity; the "lead" Legion in Legion of Three Worlds is an alternate version of that Legion, and that's the Legion that we're going to get post-Final Crisis.as well as Superboy and the true Legion of Super-Heroes.
I'm still hanging my head in confusion on this one.The other goal Didio had was to bring back Barry Allen
Which is why they took Superboy out post-Crisis.I would much prefer if Superboy stayed out of it; that concept cheapens his becoming Superman.
I didn't know that the lawsuit over the use of Superboy had been settled...that's good news. I re-read that article again and yes apprently there is no Krypton at all and as people have explained takes place from Clark's earliest child hood memories in Smallville.
First of all, I'm frankly stunned by the cynicism and bitterness of some of you fanboys here.
Dan Didio has admitted in a few recent interviews that Crisis on Infinite Earths was a mistake
to restore Superman's continuity, as it had suffered perhaps more than any other character's in the post-COIE fallout.
The company is finally giving fans what it deserves, unlike the trashy shysters across the street. I don't see why there's so much distrust and hate.
In the 20th century, he was Valor. In the post-Zero Hour 30th century, he was called M'onel.Who the hell is Mon-El? Sounds like his name was taken from Monday and Kal's last name!![]()
Didn't they change Lar Gand's hero name to Val-Or or something similar?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.