number6
Vice Admiral
Atmospheric "wallpaper" scores became a prevailing trend in Hollywood at that time. Ron Jones' scores sounded pretty dated, imo. His style was much more suited to animated sitcom, as evidenced by his scores for Family Guy. Aparently he was also very temperamental and did not take direction well. That was one of many reasons he was fired from TNG.
In refutation of the former I would point to his work on the Binar's episode and "Best of Both Worlds" in particular.
And if by "not taking direction well" you mean not giving in and turning out audio pablum like King B wanted, then Viva la Revolucione!
Not taking direction well can mean many things. I work in the music/audio field. I have for my entire adult life. There are a lot of inflexible, temperamental people in my field. I am sure if Jones and Berman didn't see eye to eye for whatever creative reason, and Jones wasn't flexible, Jones wouldn't be working there for long.
I'm not a fan of his work, but then I found most 80's-90's musical scores for TV terribly bland. That trend was not unique to Berman or Star Trek.
You can blame Berman for rain being wet, but I don't believe Jones' work (or attitude, as I've seen in interviews) made him indispensible.

I guarantee you, the acoustics of a modern recording studio sound nothing like the acoustics of a normal room, corridor, or outdoors location, so by that standard, background music never "fits." Besides, it's not like the music is actually supposed to exist as part of the ambient sound of the environment, with the characters hearing it (unless it's actually diegetic, like dance music or a song on the radio -- and even diegetic music or "live" singing in a show or movie is always a dubbed track recorded in a studio, so it wouldn't match the real acoustics of the environment anyway). So what difference does it make whether it "fits" the environment?
