Maybe Republicans Are Starting To Make A Comeback

[Cicero]

I don't give a flying rip about wire tapping.

To me if you have nothing to hide then why be concerned.

Warrantless wiretapping itself is less concerning than is the unconstitutionality of the action. If you believe that warantless wiretapping should be legal, then you should seek to change the Constitution to make it so, not disregard the Constitution or seek to override it with tortured logic because you disagree with it.

 

[Dayton3]

How do you know what reasoning Al Queda uses to justify their actions?

Besides, I don't see the U.S. deliberately trying to kill innocent civilians.

And privacy isn't mentioned in the U.S. Constitution.

Finally,

Jefferson was just a man like the rest of us. He had biases, preconceived notions, and bad ideas just like anyone.

His name means nothing to me.

 

[Dayton3]

I don't give a flying rip about wire tapping.

To me if you have nothing to hide then why be concerned.

Warrantless wiretapping itself is less concerning than is the unconstitutionality of the action. If you believe that warantless wiretapping should be legal, then you should seek to change the Constitution to make it so, not disregard the Constitution or seek to override it with tortured logic because you disagree with it.

Nah.

Amending the constitution is too cumbersome a process.

 

[JonathonWally]

How do you know what reasoning Al Queda uses to justify their actions?

Besides, I don't see the U.S. deliberately trying to kill innocent civilians.

And privacy isn't mentioned in the U.S. Constitution.

Finally,

Jefferson was just a man like the rest of us. He had biases, preconceived notions, and bad ideas just like anyone.

His name means nothing to me.

Lots of Al Queda in Arkansas?

 

[Cicero]

I don't give a flying rip about wire tapping.

To me if you have nothing to hide then why be concerned.

Warrantless wiretapping itself is less concerning than is the unconstitutionality of the action. If you believe that warantless wiretapping should be legal, then you should seek to change the Constitution to make it so, not disregard the Constitution or seek to override it with tortured logic because you disagree with it.

Nah.

Amending the constitution is too cumbersome a process.

Do you care what the Constitution says or respect it as our highest law?

 

[Amaris]

How do you know what reasoning Al Queda uses to justify their actions?

Besides, I don't see the U.S. deliberately trying to kill innocent civilians.

And privacy isn't mentioned in the U.S. Constitution.

Finally,

Jefferson was just a man like the rest of us. He had biases, preconceived notions, and bad ideas just like anyone.

His name means nothing to me.

You're a rather dangerous individual. I hope for the sake of liberty, there are no members of Congress who think as you do, or freedom will fall to tyranny.

J.

 

[Squiggy]

I don't give a flying rip about wire tapping.

To me if you have nothing to hide then why be concerned.

Warrantless wiretapping itself is less concerning than is the unconstitutionality of the action. If you believe that warantless wiretapping should be legal, then you should seek to change the Constitution to make it so, not disregard the Constitution or seek to override it with tortured logic because you disagree with it.

Nah.

Amending the constitution is too cumbersome a process.

That's the point, Mr. History.

 

[Dayton3]

Warrantless wiretapping itself is less concerning than is the unconstitutionality of the action. If you believe that warantless wiretapping should be legal, then you should seek to change the Constitution to make it so, not disregard the Constitution or seek to override it with tortured logic because you disagree with it.

Nah.

Amending the constitution is too cumbersome a process.

Do you care what the Constitution says or respect it as our highest law?

A flawed document written by a group of slaveowners who had an overwrought fear of the British and European power politics in general.

It isn't the Bible.

 

[JonathonWally]

Nah.

Amending the constitution is too cumbersome a process.

Do you care what the Constitution says or respect it as our highest law?

A flawed document written by a group of slaveowners who had an overwrought fear of the British and European power politics in general.

It isn't the Bible.

So what you're saying is that you hate America and all that it was built upon ya?

 

[Dayton3]

How do you know what reasoning Al Queda uses to justify their actions?

Besides, I don't see the U.S. deliberately trying to kill innocent civilians.

And privacy isn't mentioned in the U.S. Constitution.

Finally,

Jefferson was just a man like the rest of us. He had biases, preconceived notions, and bad ideas just like anyone.

His name means nothing to me.

Lots of Al Queda in Arkansas?

For what its worth

Seriously, get this:

Part of the yearly school bus drivers training this year was in how to thwart terrorist attacks on our buses.

They produced a video and everything.

We can't get a couple of students to keep their feet out of the aisle but we're supposed to stop a Crimson Jihad assault cold...........

 

[Dayton3]

Do you care what the Constitution says or respect it as our highest law?

A flawed document written by a group of slaveowners who had an overwrought fear of the British and European power politics in general.

It isn't the Bible.

So what you're saying is that you hate America and all that it was built upon ya?

There was an America before the Constitution.

There will be one should be choose to replace it with something better.

 

[JonathonWally]

A flawed document written by a group of slaveowners who had an overwrought fear of the British and European power politics in general.

It isn't the Bible.

So what you're saying is that you hate America and all that it was built upon ya?

There was an America before the Constitution.

There will be one should be choose to replace it with something better.

So, you don't like America?

 

[Dayton3]

So what you're saying is that you hate America and all that it was built upon ya?

There was an America before the Constitution.

There will be one should be choose to replace it with something better.

So, you don't like America?

I love the United States of America.

But the USA and the U.S. Constitution are not one and the same.

Americans should see it as a document much the same as a city charter.

Not like a Holy Book.

 

[Trekker4747]

I don't give a flying rip about wire tapping.

To me if you have nothing to hide then why be concerned.

Did you...



How can...



Seriously man.

What.

The.

Fuck.

That's the antithesis of the foundations this country was built on. It doesn't matter you've nothing to hide, you still shouldn't stand for this kind of shit.

 

[JonathonWally]

There was an America before the Constitution.

There will be one should be choose to replace it with something better.

So, you don't like America?

I love the United States of America.

But the USA and the U.S. Constitution are not one and the same.

Americans should see it as a document much the same as a city charter.

Not like a Holy Book.

Can gays get married then?

 

[Trekker4747]

I don't give a flying rip about wire tapping.

To me if you have nothing to hide then why be concerned.

Warrantless wiretapping itself is less concerning than is the unconstitutionality of the action. If you believe that warantless wiretapping should be legal, then you should seek to change the Constitution to make it so, not disregard the Constitution or seek to override it with tortured logic because you disagree with it.

Nah.

Amending the constitution is too cumbersome a process.

God, I wish this was TNZ.

 

[Dayton3]

So, you don't like America?

I love the United States of America.

But the USA and the U.S. Constitution are not one and the same.

Americans should see it as a document much the same as a city charter.

Not like a Holy Book.

Can gays get married then?

Personally, I would prefer they not be allowed to.

Although I suppose common law marriages based on prolonged cohabitation would be reasonable.

But marriage is not a "right" by any stretch of the imagination.

 

[Dayton3]

Actually, one can make the strong argument that the

1) Constitution being difficult to change

&

2) Constitution being rather vague on many issues

means that the Constitution was INTENDED to be stretched and twisted as time passes to meet the needs of a changing nation.

 

[JonathonWally]

I love the United States of America.

But the USA and the U.S. Constitution are not one and the same.

Americans should see it as a document much the same as a city charter.

Not like a Holy Book.

Can gays get married then?

Personally, I would prefer they not be allowed to.

Although I suppose common law marriages based on prolonged cohabitation would be reasonable.

But marriage is not a "right" by any stretch of the imagination.

Why not?

 

[Elmo Dukat]

This stuff is always cyclical. Great Divine History Teacher, let thou patrons know political power waxes and wanes, and the two party system is the most stable system known (which means it's not going one party any time soon, unless that nuke on the horizon hits its target)