• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

HEROES 3x11 "The Eclipse, Part 2" Discuss and Grade

Grade the episode


  • Total voters
    64
Also, I love how alot of you guys are like "That's it, I'm DONE with this show/season/series! This episode was the tipping point..." but then every week you come back to talk about the next episode hahaha

Season one earned this show a chance with me, but as long as the situation with Peter persists I can't enjoy it as much as I used to. That one decision cut the quality of the show in half, it went from being a show that I look forward to every week to being one I watch when it's convenient just because of that.

Up until that point, I was willing to let the occasional problem slip. Peter Petrelli is this show's Rogue, and they're making all the same mistakes the many, many people who have written her over the years have made.
 
All good characters have some weakness or deficiency. If they were perfect, they'd be a bore. The Heroes characters have some nice ways their unique villainy could be pulled out of them:

Matt means well but he's an action guy and he doesn't think in abstractions of good and evil. That would make him very prone to abusing his mental powers without stopping to realize that what he's doing can't be justified just because he means well and the ends are "good." Like in Five Years Gone.

Mohinder is in this story because he is motivated by what should motivate a scientist, a love of exploration and uncovering amazing things. With just a few changes, his dopey mad scientist plotline this season could have been perfect for him.

Nathan overcame his ambition, cynicism and selfishness in the S1 finale long enough to become a hero, but those traits didn't just vanish. They are part of his personality and can re-emerge under the right circumstances. Stupidly enough, his "villain" story seems to be about him being idealistic, stupid and naive, which are not his villain traits or any sorts of traits he's ever possessed! Those belong to his brother...

Peter can get carried away by his martyr complex and angry sense of self-righteousness when he isn't wallowing in self-pity. To top it all off, he's immature, kinda dense and lacks personal insight. In short, he's a disaster waiting to happen. Give him unlimited power, and villainy would be the next logical step. All the while of course he'd be so enmeshed in his self-justifying fantasies of heroism, nobody would be able to get through to him to kick some common sense into him.

There was never any reason to bring on new characters like Flint or Knox to be villains. Those guys are duds compared to the wonderful potential of the incipient villains they've already got on the payroll.


Marry me!:)

All great points. True villany often stems from some twisted altruistic motivation. Lex Luthor feels that he, as a human, should be Earth's savior and not a certain longjohn wearing alien. Doctor Doom believes that he is the best thing for the world. Senator Palpatine's villany derived from his twisted sense of order. And in Lord Of The Rings, anyone who got in contact with the One Ring (except for Gollum) felt they could do good with it. If the writers realized that the road to hell is paved with good intentions, "Villans" might have been pretty good. Instead, we are stuck with a bunch of moustache twirlers and moustache twirler wannabes that are slaves to the plot. Didn't these guys learn from ENT that plot driven dramas don't work?
 
Well, I didn't watch this week's episode yet, because my DVR failed to get the last couple of minutes, again. :scream: I'll catch up to it through other means eventually, but in the meantime I've had a look round this thread, because spoilers for this show honestly don't bother me that much any more.


am I the only one who found the comic shop scenes a really hamfisted & lame attempt at pleasing fanboy types?

Not to mention (in last week's episode) a really hamfisted attempt to plug some of Jeph Loeb's crappy comic book work (when Seth Green referred to the "red Hulk" comic book). :rolleyes:

One wonders what Jeph Loeb's role is behind the scenes, because he is a much better comic book writer than what we're getting on the screen...

Well...

Have you read any of the recent Loeb stuff?

What he said. Loeb hasn't done anything good since a while before he left DC (though parts of the Fallen Son mini-series were almost OK).

His job probably consists of listening to producers condescendingly explain to him that mirroring the comic book style of storytelling too closely will make the material inaccessible to the more "mainstream," non-geek viewer and sabotage the ratings.

Well, actually, his job now is to look for a new job...

^ That's kinda why I don't comment much in these threads. I admit the show is driving me crazy the last couple seasons, but it's too much work to analyze it to death anymore. I know I'll still be interested in what happens next, at least for a while.

I will say though, that my chosen viewing order has changed significantly lately. Heroes is no longer in the coveted "favorite saved for last" position. Now I watch Heroes, then save Chuck for last. :techman:

Whether it's true or not, the show no longer feels like the writers know where they're going with it. In the first season, as you watched each week, you felt like the story unfolding before you was carefully planned, practically past tense in its certainty. Like reading Isaac Mendez' comic, when the ending had already been written. The show doesn't feel like that anymore. Much as I've enjoyed the premise, I almost wish they'd stopped at the end of Season 1.

Merrily on High expresses this far better than I could, but I agree with everything he says here. I used to really like this show. I haven't entirely given up yet, but I do wonder if it may be too late... :(
 
This show is losing me. I thought most of the confusion came from the last three or so episodes, but I've been doing a Heroes rewatch with a friend to get her all caught up, and this season has been zigzagging all over the place. Sylar has now gone from evil, to beng unable to control 'the hunger,' then struggling to be good, and then back to evil again! Hell in one episode, he goes from willing to sacrifice himself to save Elle, to killing her. I'm sure that's worth at least five Caitlins. Whatever.

I was enjoying the season but really, on reflection, all the writers to is base an episode or two on some gimmick, which in turn confuses the hell out of me when I try to resolve it with what I've watched before. And then the writers drop it and move on, causing more confusion.

This two-parter really did nothing for me. And what's the deal with having a two-parter in an arc-based show? Stretching an eclipse over two episodes was a *really* clever idea. :rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
Someone said earlier in this thread about Peter not getting his powers back.

Don't forget, he does get some of the power back eventually, due to his future self being able to time travel. He doesn't however seem to get Claire's power back, as he gets killed and has that large scar on his face from somewhere (which will hopefully happen before the Villains arc ends in two weeks, otherwise we have to wait for Vol 4: Fugitives in February).

This is assuming they will carry on some continuity with future flash forwards, given many timelines in the first two years never came to fruition (like the season one ep Five Years Gone).
 
I will say though, that my chosen viewing order has changed significantly lately. Heroes is no longer in the coveted "favorite saved for last" position. Now I watch Heroes, then save Chuck for last. :techman:
Hey, you stole that idea from me!

My friends and I now watch "Chuck" after "Heroes" so we can end on a high note.
 
Someone said earlier in this thread about Peter not getting his powers back.

Don't forget, he does get some of the power back eventually, due to his future self being able to time travel. He doesn't however seem to get Claire's power back, as he gets killed and has that large scar on his face from somewhere (which will hopefully happen before the Villains arc ends in two weeks, otherwise we have to wait for Vol 4: Fugitives in February).

This is assuming they will carry on some continuity with future flash forwards, given many timelines in the first two years never came to fruition (like the season one ep Five Years Gone).

That was probably me. You are making the assumption that Present Peter's knowledge of the future has not changed that future. I still say Peter will get lumbered with some single use, passive, defensive power. None of the good guys have an outright destructive power.
 
I still say Peter will get lumbered with some single use, passive, defensive power. None of the good guys have an outright destructive power.

The radioactive guy from season one was pretty destructive, although he didn't last very long.

Micah could probably be pretty disruptive if you pissed him off!
 
Marry me!:)
Hey my first internet marriage proposal. Sure, why not. :D

The way to do a story about villains is to forget the WWF as a model (I certainly hope that's not what they've been using but it might help explain why the writing is so bad) is to find the specific and unique "villain" in each character so that all the characters are different and true to their own selves.

Don't knock it, wrestling still occasionally provides a genuine surprise which is more than I can say for this show.

I'm stubbornly holding out for slightly better quality storylines than the literary talents behind WWF might provide and now that Bryan Fuller really is returning to the show, I might just get that! :bolian:

Below Average; I still enjoy the characters too much to ever give this show a Poor but blech, this Volume is shaping up to be an utter disaster. :rommie:
...

Temis, are you bipolar? :lol: (I mean that in the nicest sense) :)

Last episode you rated very highly...
Excellent! This episode is what this show should be doing every week, putting characters in scenes together and having them use dialogue to actually push their character arcs forward.
...Yet this episode you rate lowly and call this volume an "utter disaster".

Yet both parts of the two-parter contained the same break-neck character inconsistencies and sudden motivational changes. Is it just that you liked the changes last episode but disliked how they changed this episode? Just curious...

I was just overjoyed to see any sort of dialogue between characters attempted, but they revoked any goodness from last week with catastrophic nonsense this week, which retroactively lowers my last week's grade to no higher than Average. Plus I've been cutting these clowns way too much slack, waiting patiently for them to get their shit together, and this was the week that I realized they don't have it in em to get their shit together.

I'm not so much bipolar as this is an example of what happens when we rate a serialized show on a week-to-week basis. I won't be able to make a real stab at an opinion until the whole thing is over. I can't really say plot twists like Peter and Nathan in the jungle or Sylar and Elle on the run are good or bad until I see where they're going with these things. I give em the benefit of the doubt until I know for certain they have no good plan in mind. I thought the dialogue last week was pushing the character arcs forward, and this week it became obvious that it did nothing of the sort.

For instance last week I liked the fact that Elle and Sylar had hooked up because they were both damaged outcasts and it made sense they'd try to rely on each other for support. This week, Sylar kills Elle. Why? No reason I can discern. They rescinded what could have been an interesting and reasonably sensible plot turn.

They also contradicted things we supposedly learned about Sylar, such as that just getting powers rather than "seeing" them is enough to quell the hunger (or are we to assume Arthur was lying when he said Sylar was primarily after power?); that he knows his future self can control the hunger and therefore his "why bother trying" attitude is incomprehensible.

Sylar not being a Petrelli doesn't wash; if Angela was lying, why did Arthur back her up in her lie? A much better strategy would be for him to claim he was Sylar's father and Virginia is his real mother. Angela is the manipulative liar and Arthur is his true father. That would cement Sylar's loyalty far better than just making him choose between parents.

For Sylar to believe Noah for one second just shows that he isn't thinking; and for him to have believed Angela or Arthur in the first place is idiotic unless his supernatural intuition was kicking in and telling him the story is true due to some awareness he has that others don't possess and that the TV audience can't directly see. He cannot possibly be so dense that he wouldn't realize that both of them have every reason to lie about being his parents. GAH!

Last week I liked the fact that Peter and Nathan were finally having it out: Peter's an annoying, clingy little pest; Nathan is a puppet of evil powerful people. Great stuff. This week they rescinded that by having Nathan praise Peter's lack of intelligent decision-making skills in staying behind to get his fool self killed, and the only reason he didn't get killed was the deus ex machina of the eclipse, so why should he get any praise? Then Nathan decides to become a naive idiot himself by raising an army of superheroes we all know will turn into a total disaster, which is possibly the worst characterization mistake of this entire season.

Last week, Claire stopped being a whiny brat long enough to get some training from dad. This week, she's back to being a whiny brat. Yeesh.

So this episode really is significantly worse than last week. Plus I might have been slightly drunk when I wrote one or both of those reviews. :rommie:
Part 2 basically reset everybody back to their Season 1 status.
Yeah there's definitely the "so what the frak was the point of all that?" factor. They can weave around insanely with plot twists as long as they are going somewhere, but when they reveal they just went around in the circle, I have to put my foot down.
Wow... I love your whole "my opinion is that this show/episode sucks balls and everyone who thinks otherwise is a fucking idiot" stance. Though I disagree, I admire such audacity and imposition. :techman:
You must not know me very well. :rommie: I've been doing this since October 1999, kiddo. Not likely to ever change.

Also, I love how alot of you guys are like "That's it, I'm DONE with this show/season/series! This episode was the tipping point..." but then every week you come back to talk about the next episode hahaha
Heroes is one of those rare, wonderful shows that offer a win/win proposition - when it's good, it's fun to watch and when it's bad, it's fun to bash. Not too many of those types on TV sadly - Star Trek used to be my favorite bashing fodder. Most bad shows are just dull-bad and I bail on them, but with Heroes, I'm pretty sure I'm in for the duration.

And with Bryan Fuller's immanent return, I don't think now is the time for anyone to be bailing. This show might just be in for an amazing improvement.

Someone said earlier in this thread about Peter not getting his powers back.

Don't forget, he does get some of the power back eventually, due to his future self being able to time travel.
Future Peter probably never met Arthur. In that timeline, maybe Arthur stayed dead?
 
Last edited:
Not sure, but the episodes airing in December might be the last ones done under the old producers who got fired; Heroes isn't slated to return immediately after the Xmas break so many they're waiting till Fuller can get rolling on things.

It certainly will be interesting to see what happens.

EDIT: elsewhere I saw that he's going to start with Episode 20. Urgh, that means a lot more nonsense to wade thru. Next week is only Episode 12. I just hope the ratings don't erode beyond hope before Fuller can try to turn things around.
 
Last edited:
DL's power had a destructive component to it and he was a good guy...even got a medal. :)

I still say Peter will get lumbered with some single use, passive, defensive power. None of the good guys have an outright destructive power.

The radioactive guy from season one was pretty destructive, although he didn't last very long.

Micah could probably be pretty disruptive if you pissed him off!

DL's dead, Micah's gone and Sprague was hardly a good guy. He'd be working for Arthur if he was still alive.

Look at Team Angela:

Peter and Ando - Nothing.
Nathan - Flight, not a destructive power any more than a car is a deadly weapon.
Hiro - Telportation and Time Manipulation. He can use it to transport people away but he has to touch them first.
Claire - Regenerative healing, she's still as weak as an other teenage girl.
Matt - Telepathy and mind control.
Daphne - Super speed.
Angela - Precognitive dreams.

These are all Light Side of the Force powers. Against them you have Team Arthur:

Arthur: Power absorbtion (permanent by touch and duplication just by being in the same room), telepathy, mind control, teleportation, time manipulation, precognitive painting, electricity generation, radiation manipulation, fire manipulation, flight, regenerative healing, poison emission, telekinesis, super speed - basically anything he'd absorbed himself plus Peter's old abilities.

Sylar: After recovering from the virus Sylar now has intuitive aptitude, telekinesis, alchemic transformation, clairsentience, sound manipulation, electricity manipulation and regenerative healing.

Flint: Fire manipulation
Knox: Superhuman strength generated by fear
Tracy: Cryokinesis

All of these are destructive powers. They're the Dark Side of the Force.
 
Peter and Ando - Nothing.
Nathan - Flight, not a destructive power any more than a car is a deadly weapon.
Hiro - Telportation and Time Manipulation. He can use it to transport people away but he has to touch them first.
Claire - Regenerative healing, she's still as weak as an other teenage girl.
Matt - Telepathy and mind control.
Daphne - Super speed.
Angela - Precognitive dreams.
Matt's power can royally [smurf] someone up, and although she's not a fighter, Daphne's superspeed could do the same if she were so inclined. One tiny fist moving at Mach Whatever = stain on the wall. Same goes with Nathan (hell, we saw him do that!). Even Hiro could potentially use his power to artifically age someone (speeding time up for them relative to the rest of the universe). The thing is, none of those characters want to [smurf] anyone up. At least not in that sort of fashion.

And while Peter is powerless now, he wasn't like that only a few episodes ago, nor will he continue to be powerless.
 
Matt's power can royally [smurf] someone up,

If they allow him to do it. What would stop someone like Flint from just blasting him at the first sign of trouble ?

and although she's not a fighter, Daphne's superspeed could do the same if she were so inclined. One tiny fist moving at Mach Whatever = stain on the wall.

Peter soon overcame that the first time we saw her do it.

Same goes with Nathan (hell, we saw him do that!). Even Hiro could potentially use his power to artifically age someone (speeding time up for them relative to the rest of the universe). The thing is, none of those characters want to [smurf] anyone up. At least not in that sort of fashion.

All of their powers are defensive ones with offensive possibilities if the user is imaginative enough to do it. None of them could actually stand and fight someone like Arthur or Sylar. They'd struggle with Flint or Knox.

And while Peter is powerless now, he wasn't like that only a few episodes ago, nor will he continue to be powerless.

Don't be so sure. Peter's current storyline is following a very familiar path to those of us who've read X-Men comics over the years.
 
If they're clever....

I don't think Sylar's evil again, or that Elle is really dead, for the same reason that I don't think Maury's dead. How do you lie to someone who can read your mind? You have a memory clear in your head of something that isn't true. I think that the Maury that got his neck snapped was as real as the fake Linderman, and the entire plea for his son's life and subsequent death was play acted by Maury and Arthur so that Daphne would run off to Matt with a clear image of his dad being killed stuck in her head.

I think Gabe is trying to fool his old man, and at the same time send Elle off from the only life she's known, as the company girl, and sent her away from danger. Nobody will come looking for her if they think she's dead. Doesn't mean that we'll see Elle again, either!
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top