And to bring the joke full circle back to the topic...

He doesn't understand that one is capable of understanding and taking a joke but also twisting it around and making it into a serious discussion.
Books at the end of the day do account for large amounts of deforestation joke or no joke.
What you don't understand is that the paper used for books doesn't have shit to do with deforestation of the Amazon rainforest. Reforestation is practiced by most wood pulp manufacturers because they're dependent on the wood for their business to survive.
The vast majority of Amazon rainforest is cut down as pasture for livestock, and to grow soybeans (both for livestock feed and other uses).
So, you missed the joke, your understanding of deforestation causes is wrong, you're completely incapable of recognizing sarcasm, and you're congratulating yourself on coming up with ideas that already exist. Keep digging that hole.
Last edited: