really? I would never have said Torchwood had bad CGI.I didn't think the CG was that bad considering the budget they have on these productions - at least it's better than Torchwood in that department
The space whale was pretty bad.really? I would never have said Torchwood had bad CGI.I didn't think the CG was that bad considering the budget they have on these productions - at least it's better than Torchwood in that department
fair point, there was some poor blue screen in that episode.The space whale was pretty bad.really? I would never have said Torchwood had bad CGI.I didn't think the CG was that bad considering the budget they have on these productions - at least it's better than Torchwood in that department
Then again, I suppose it was supposed to be a kinda shapeless blob, which is probably a bit vague for the CGI team.
I'm still trying to put my figner on what it is about this show that makes me watch it every week.
^I don't get the complaint, I mean it's a TV show that's "re-imaginging" the story. Everything is wrong about it, but I don't care because all I'm looking for is entertainment, not a faithful retelling of a story that has no faithful retelling. Because, lets face it, there are so many different takes on religion, folklore, myths and legends that it'd be impossible to get it right in most people's eyes anyway.
I guess I switch my brain a little too far off when watching this, Primeval and Robin Hood, because I didn't even think of that until you mentioned it.^I don't get the complaint, I mean it's a TV show that's "re-imaginging" the story. Everything is wrong about it, but I don't care because all I'm looking for is entertainment, not a faithful retelling of a story that has no faithful retelling. Because, lets face it, there are so many different takes on religion, folklore, myths and legends that it'd be impossible to get it right in most people's eyes anyway.
Yeah, I know, I said I was biased.
And I figured the potatoes and tomatoes were so obvious everybody would complain
I guess I switch my brain a little too far off when watching this, Primeval and Robin Hood, because I didn't even think of that until you mentioned it.^I don't get the complaint, I mean it's a TV show that's "re-imaginging" the story. Everything is wrong about it, but I don't care because all I'm looking for is entertainment, not a faithful retelling of a story that has no faithful retelling. Because, lets face it, there are so many different takes on religion, folklore, myths and legends that it'd be impossible to get it right in most people's eyes anyway.
Yeah, I know, I said I was biased.
And I figured the potatoes and tomatoes were so obvious everybody would complain![]()
Yikes. There's sloppy and there's flat-out, who-gives-a-fuck insulting-to-the-audience.And don't get me started about the potatoes and tomatoes.
Nice try, but anachronistic food items are going to be far too obvious to far too many people in the audience, or at least the ones who have a glimmer of education (maybe the BBC is assuming their audience is composed of dolts and they don't need to bother to make any effort). The tradition of anachronisms like late medievel architecture, shining armor and widespread Christianity in Merlin's time is long established; but getting mundane details wrong comes from sheer carelessness. It's not like there's a point to putting a frakkin stupid tomato in the story like there would be a point to a griffin.After all, if we're to accept COMPLETELY anachronistic building designs, weapons and armour, clothing, scientific knowledge, speech patterns and MAGIC all over the place, I think we can accept that this fantasy version of early medieval England has plants that look a lot like tomatoes and potatoes in amongst its griffins and fairies and things.
Yikes. There's sloppy and there's flat-out, who-gives-a-fuck insulting-to-the-audience.And don't get me started about the potatoes and tomatoes.
I sure hope for NBC's sake they didn't pay much for this turkey (another food item that Merlin has no business knowing about). This suckers going to crash & burn worse than Crusoe.
Nice try, but anachronistic food items are going to be far too obvious to far too many people in the audience, or at least the ones who have a glimmer of education (maybe the BBC is assuming their audience is composed of dolts and they don't need to bother to make any effort). The tradition of anachronisms like late medievel architecture, shining armor and widespread Christianity in Merlin's time is long established; but getting mundane details wrong comes from sheer carelessness. It's not like there's a point to putting a frakkin stupid tomato in the story like there would be a point to a griffin.After all, if we're to accept COMPLETELY anachronistic building designs, weapons and armour, clothing, scientific knowledge, speech patterns and MAGIC all over the place, I think we can accept that this fantasy version of early medieval England has plants that look a lot like tomatoes and potatoes in amongst its griffins and fairies and things.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.