Dude, seriously? does one little number bother you that much?
0Right 0then, 0from 0now 0on 0I'll 0only 0ever 0talk 0like 0this 0in 0here.
Is this Star Trel XI or Star Trek I?
- Thread starter Trekker4747
- Start date
Dude, seriously? does one little number bother you that much?
0Right 0then, 0from 0now 0on 0I'll 0only 0ever 0talk 0like 0this 0in 0here.
Assume that it does.
one tiny little zero of little or no real consequence to anything at all in the entire movie appearing for all of a few moments has you on full fanboy rage mode and ready to boycott the film?And people wonder why fans are made fun of. How can you be so anal over one digit, ironically the one that denotes 'nothing', when it really matters so damned little?
ST-One
Vice Admiral
Crap, how the hell did I miss this before? More proof that Abrams and his cohorts are in love with zero.
Star Trek Alpha
That's fine, there's never been a movie called Star Trek
The problem is, what would the sequel be - Star Trek 2?
Even if they call the next one Star Trek 2, I'm still calling it ST XII. Coz that is what it is. Don't give me all this 'reimagined' baloney. The previous Trek films DID happen.
However, i don't see the 0 on the Kelvin's registry as being a big deal. We've already had the NX-01 and the Dauntless, which had a 0 prefix. What's the problem here?
However, i don't see the 0 on the Kelvin's registry as being a big deal. We've already had the NX-01 and the Dauntless, which had a 0 prefix. What's the problem here?
No they didn't. It was all a dream, just a dream....
I must be Star Trek: Zero. Regal Cinemas started having Coke Zero at there concession stand.
The movie will be called Star Trek and fans will call it ST:XI.
You're right. It's a sequel. In TVH, Kirk and Crew went back in time and in FC, Picard did the same. Does that mean they weren't sequels? Of course not. The biggest difference is in those movies we didn't see familiar characters as their younger selves. I'm guessing Spock goes back near the beginning and somewhere along the way we learn how he ends up in the future. Does he stay or die in the past? Does he return to the 24th century? Either way, the story will be bookended by the 24th century directly or indirectly, IMO. Will it adhere solidly to canon? No, but Trek movies are known for that. There are mistakes throughout each film. While I wish there weren't, I have to admit that it's fun finding the flaws and having a laugh about them. So, my mind is wide open for a great adventure with a good cast, oustanding SPFX, and a solid story.
Last edited:
number6
Vice Admiral
Shouldn't you be blogging your disgust on Wordforge or something?
Similar threads
