I voted average on this one. What I have to say may sound more negative than it is meant to be, I do like the show and hope it succeeds.
However, as another poster said, "the pattern" or formula of each episode needs to change. We're three eps in, and already it's feeling a little tired. I'm not even talking about new plots - I don't expect that from any show anymore - just something different in how the episode is constructed. A little freshness in the plot would be appreciated, though. This episode, in particular... well, I called the ending less than 15 minutes in, and nailed it. Last week's, I was able to piece together most of it, but it wasn't quite so obvious.
Beyond the stories themselves... the show just seems to be lacking something. Some undefinable quality to make it compelling, to make it stand out. The acting ranges from fair to excellent, the dialogue vacillates between scintillating and staid, and the cinematography is serviceable if uninspired.
Everyone raves about Walter, and I admit, I love the character and think John Noble does an excellent job. But I also believe that unless they balance out those eccentric outbursts and odd traits with something else, it will get tired and annoying soon. Anna Torv, often touted as "the next big thing" in reviews, leaves me less than impressed. She's just...okay. Kinda bland and lifeless. I know that Olivia Dunham is a restrained, reserved character, but other actors have been able to make a character like that interesting. So far, she hasn't. Of course, the rather predictable writing hasn't helped her much either. Quite honestly, I think the show's true acting standout is Joshua Jackson. When the show was in development and I heard he joined the cast, I was quite worried that he'd be the odd man out, and wouldn't find it with the rest of the cast. Well, in a way I suppose he is the odd man out, only in the sense that he gives what I consider to be the only really compelling performance on the series. Walter is enjoyable, but too larger than life to really appreciate on that level. Olivia is flat. Broyles is merely the "mysertious leader with a hidden agenda" stereotype. The others barely register a blip. I find Peter to be the truly engaging one, from a performance standpoint. I want to watch him (and Walter, to a degree). The others, I just don't care about. Even though -- and I just this moment realized it -- he's basically playing Tom Cruise to Walter's Rain Man, all the while spouting a lot of clunky exposition by way of translating from "Walter speak."
Beyond the characters... I really thought the concept would come off well, and I think it has, to an extent. All the ingredients for something fantastic are there, but at the same point, it's lacking spice, flavor, something to really make an impact. Fringe is basically billed as X-Files: The Next Generation, with a touch of Alias thrown in. But both of those series, especially X-Files had much more atmosphere than Fringe. Even in their earliest episodes -- as hit or miss as they could be -- there was something that really kept you on the edge of your seat. Fringe makes me yawn as much as it makes me laugh, and hasn't yet pushed me to the edge. It needs to be...scarier, I guess. Not more graphic or bloody or sexy, but more atmospheric. Freakier. Just...something more. More than it is currently, at any rate.
Maybe I'm expecting too much because it's a J.J. Abrams series. I'm not saying it needs to be Lost. Not at all. But it needs something to grab my attention, to get me involved. Lost did that from the very first scene. Fringe hasn't managed it over three hours. I hope it's just slow in developing, and that with a couple more shows, it will find its mark. And I hope that FOX actually gives it a chance.