^ They were 45s that had the comics, not 78s....
I have ST comics on 45s and 33s. Some titles were released in both versions, and with either TOS art or TMP photo covers
^ They were 45s that had the comics, not 78s....
So they didn't make any effort (and yeah I understand it would have been a considerable one) to clean up the images a bit?
It's not done on a scanner. It's actually a really cool camera rig GIT uses. It holds the comic open and flat and photographs each page digitally.Well, now that is really agrivating. So are these pretty much just straight scans, as if someone put them in a scanner and them put it all on a disc?
That's what I thought, but I just thought I'd make sure. I don't have a problem with that. I was just thinking that maybe they somehow went in and just redid all of the stuff on a computer. But I guess that probably would have taken them years to try and put together.^^Well, yeah, what else would they be? After all, most of these comics were published decades ago before there was any form of digital storage. Scanning them is the only way to archive them. And it has the advantage that you get everything that was in the original, including letters, editorial columns, and ads, so it's more thorough than the kind of thing you'd get in a TPB reprint. The catch is that it's only as good as the copies available for archiving, so sometimes you get wrinkles, tears, smudges, or in this case, missing pages.
Understandable. I'll happily put up with some defects if it meant I can get every Trek comic published.So they didn't make any effort (and yeah I understand it would have been a considerable one) to clean up the images a bit?
Don't misunderstand me, they look great. The defects I mentioned are rare. I'm sure GITCorp tried to find near-mint copies in every case, but when dealing with decades-old comics, that may not always be feasible.
Nifty.It's not done on a scanner. It's actually a really cool camera rig GIT uses. It holds the comic open and flat and photographs each page digitally.Well, now that is really agrivating. So are these pretty much just straight scans, as if someone put them in a scanner and them put it all on a disc?
Sad to say, I've discovered that the copy of Marvel's Star Trek Unlimited #3 scanned by the DVD's makers is apparently missing several pages. Both the TOS and TNG stories have abrupt jumps in the narrative about four pages before and after the center staple, so it seems that the sheet of paper those pages were on was either torn out or omitted from their copy.
Christopher, I just compared my physical copy to the one on the DVD and I did not find any discrepancy in that issue. Maybe there was simply a delay in loading that particular image or it was corrupt in some way?
Hmm, and mine show showed up today. Guess I'll write Amazon and see if I can get a credit.
Hmm, and mine show showed up today. Guess I'll write Amazon and see if I can get a credit.
Do so. I sent them an e-mail to them today asking what the point of pre-ordering was when it gets shipped so much later than more recent orders, and complaining about them dropping the price before even shipping it to me, and they gave me a $9.96 credit.
If they had shipped it to me on the release date, I would have chalked it up to luck of the draw and not complained about it.
I understand you may have taken advantage of a 30-day price guarantee policy in the past. However, that policy was discontinued on September 1, 2008.
Amazon responded basically saying too bad. That blows. Here's the relevant piece of the letter:
I understand you may have taken advantage of a 30-day price guarantee policy in the past. However, that policy was discontinued on September 1, 2008.
Interesting. Maybe it's because mine hadn't even shipped yet.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.