The headline I'd've gone with is "Rubber The Wrong Way".![]()
Actually I was meaning the headline at the Daily Telegraph, not the thread title.![]()
Dude. 15.
Miley Cyrus+Condoms=One fantastic evening!
![]()
I thought legal was 18.Dude. 15.
She'll be legal in a few months in most, if not all, of the US.
She's also gone (mostly) through puberty and presents the secondary sex characteristics of her adult counterparts. (Hips, beasts.)
Not saying I'd hit it if given the opportunity (even when legal) just saying she's attractive. If I was 16 I'd be totally after it.
Miley Cyrus+Condoms=One fantastic evening!
![]()
disturbing...she's 15 man. 15 is way too young to have anything to do with condoms. what do they need them for, their 15!
I thought legal was 18.
shouldnt she be influencing young girls to not have sex at all (In childhood that is)? If they see her with condoms they will think they can have sex whenever they want without any consequences at all.This I agree with. She's too young to be hawking condoms/be in a condom commercail.
However, if you think about it it *could* make sense. Lots of young girls look up to her and she's one of the better teen role-models out there right now. So if she appears in condom commercials it, logically, would seem to follow it may influence young girls to practice safer sex.
shouldnt she be influencing young girls to not have sex at all (In childhood that is)? If they see her with condoms they will think they can have sex whenever they want without any consequences at all.This I agree with. She's too young to be hawking condoms/be in a condom commercail.
However, if you think about it it *could* make sense. Lots of young girls look up to her and she's one of the better teen role-models out there right now. So if she appears in condom commercials it, logically, would seem to follow it may influence young girls to practice safer sex.
True, but they cant be led to believe that the condom makes everything okay, they need to know that they can still get pregnant or get an std, and hanna montana isnt the best symbol for that.shouldnt she be influencing young girls to not have sex at all (In childhood that is)? If they see her with condoms they will think they can have sex whenever they want without any consequences at all.This I agree with. She's too young to be hawking condoms/be in a condom commercail.
However, if you think about it it *could* make sense. Lots of young girls look up to her and she's one of the better teen role-models out there right now. So if she appears in condom commercials it, logically, would seem to follow it may influence young girls to practice safer sex.
Teenagers are going to have sex, it's much harder to prevent that. So if they're going to be having sex they might as well have safe sex.
BUT I think the real issue here is that this girl is trying to grow up too fast. I mean, look at her. She posed for Maxim's 100 sexiest women
True, but they cant be led to believe that the condom makes everything okay, they need to know that they can still get pregnant or get an std, and hanna montana isnt the best symbol for that.[/QUOTE]t that. So if they're going to be having sex they might as well have safe sex.
I agree, in the end it is up to the parents to steer the child in the right way, but then again don't teens try to rebel as much as possible against their parents? Just a thought.Some people to, I dunno, "parent" them so commercials and pop stars didn't have to.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.