So, I just watched Shakaar last night and I was stunned by the decision to insert the "O'Brien's shoulder" B plot with the very serious, and series progressing Shakaar/Kira A plot. It just did not fit, didn't share a common theme and had no place in that episode. Surely the Kira/Shakaar plot could have been extended to last a full 45 minutes. Maybe have Sisko figure out some way to assist Kira without directly "interfering"? There was simply no point to include the O'Brien thing as it did absolutely nothing to develop any of the characters or progress the DS9 story arc.
The same could be said for Life Support with the excellent plot intertwining Bariel's death, Kira's grief, Bashir's ethical dillemma and Winn's bitchiness, and the annoying Rom/Jake B plot. The Rom/Jake one at least had some character development and a morality allegory, making it better than the Shakaar B plot, but it was still had no place in that episode.
Does this annoy anyone else, or am I getting too picky?
The same could be said for Life Support with the excellent plot intertwining Bariel's death, Kira's grief, Bashir's ethical dillemma and Winn's bitchiness, and the annoying Rom/Jake B plot. The Rom/Jake one at least had some character development and a morality allegory, making it better than the Shakaar B plot, but it was still had no place in that episode.
Does this annoy anyone else, or am I getting too picky?