• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

constitution class?

Status
Not open for further replies.
The rules say that posting more than two times can be considered spamming. Generally, it's considered poor form to post so many times in a row (especially when you're replying to the same poster anyway). It's just a consideration to other posters so the bulk of a page isn't taken up by your posts.
 
One episode is hardly conclusive. Especially from way back in TOS, where a lot of the backstories were wildly inconsistent and had not yet been nailed down.

Except for the annoying fact that TOS in this matter is extremely consistent: with reality.

No they did not!

If I am wrong, feel free to post part of the transcript where there was no Federation President at the time of Journey to Babel.

You mean 3 entire quarters of the episode, the whole ffing reason the summit was called? You know, the part where Sarek wants to let the planet join the Federation partially if not entirely because he wants Starfleet to be able to protect the planet from the Tellarites, a Federation member? Essentially being able to put up several war vessels to fight continued attempts by the Tellarite to exploit them? Showing the Federation can't order the Tellarites to stop abusing another member, but the only way to protect a member from a fellow member, is to fight a border skirmish with them?

That part? You know the reason why the Enterprise was attacked?

You know, the entire ffing episode?

Oh, yes it did. It started as a military alliance during and after the Earth-Romulan War.

No the Coalition of Planets was the precursor of the United Federation of Planets.

During the Earth/Romulan war, what allies helped Earth during the war? The Andorians, Vulcans, Tellarites of which were of the Coalition of Planets with Earth.

If you feel I am wrong, feel free to prove it!

I don't need to prove a damn thing. The Coalition is from Enterprise. Enterprise is trash, we throw it on the trash heap.

No kidding... Hence why there not like the EU & the UN which you compaired as being alike.
I said - LATER. The Earlier Federation would indeed not be able to declare war in the traditional sense, but like the UN, they could make the decision that (all) members could go to war over something being bad enough.

What are you talking about? Nobody stated that any Federation ambassadors, representatives or what ever else is a permanent position. Just like ambassadors, congressmen, repersentative from our own goverment here in the US, there not permanent postion.
:sighs: :rolleyes:

Please learn how to read.

I never said a damn thing about positions being permanent, I said the institution is consistent and permanent (in operation). If the Council that Ambassadors needed to go to was like US court, they never need to go their, because they would BE their, for the entire time of their term.

Also no kidding that the Ambassadors from Babel were representing the Federation which is there government, i.e. there home world!
Nope, the Federation being a union of worlds is not a home world. Nor you can you represent something to itself.

And if you'd bother to use your brain, or learn how to read, you would understand this.

Sarek, did represent Vulcan - he's ambassador, he's not chose by its people. He represents Vulcan's government, he is their ambassador. If he represented Vulcan, he would have been chosen by its people, not appointed by its government, and as a result not carry the title ambassador.

Yes the Federation does have a permanent branch, its called the Federation Council!!! Its like Congress which is a permanent legislative branch within or own government, the congress men or women are voted there to serve a certain term, just like a council man or an ambassador serving under what ever branch in the Federation.
Nope, in TOS it did NOT have that branch. All those belonging on that council and doing the talking and voting, needed to GO there. That means, like I already said, but you don't seem to be able to read, so I'll repeat it again: it's like the UN. They are apart, away from each other, they simply are insubstantial, and only when something significant occurs, do they set up a meeting and a place to meet, give notice, and then those people, ambassadors, come and do their thing.

They are NOT like the US congress, in that they are voted in place, then move to go live in the city near the permanent building, and essentially work in/on this congress seven days a week.

Nothing of this sort is happening.

The EU & the UN have no power over any government or sovereign nation, they have no military nor can they declare war. Thats clearly not even close to being like the Federation.
Neither did the Federation. The Federation could not tell the Tellarites to stop exploiting the people of the planet that was vying for membership. The Tellarites could do whatever the hell they wanted to. The only thing the Federation could do, is approve of the the membership, and only once they were a member could they send in Starfleet to guard the planet from Tellarite exploitation - one of the Federation members. So even then, the Federation couldn't stop the Tellarites from attempting to continue their exploitation, except by stationing a permanent Starfleet guard that would protect the planet. Essentially the Federation waging a war against its own members merchants to stop it from illegally and immorally exploiting one of its fellow Federation members.

If the Federation had power over the member governments, all they had to do was order the Tellarites to stop, but they couldn't.

No, it doesn't jive with what TOS showed us of the Federation at that time.

My opinion is that TOS showed a realistic growth of the Federation, and not a magical "poof, suddenly we are here, completely as is" some other series want to show, and that the earlier is (obviously) a much better model. (Not to mention that it opens up many more story telling opportunities than if it just poof came into existence.)

The EU is Europeans, practically siblings - to the point that the only reason that there is a France, Spain, Germany and other countries today is that the three sons of Charles the Great who ruled over the three territories under their father, wouldn't accept any of the other brothers above them and so it splintered apart - and the EU only forms step by little step.

Do you really think, that completely different species, some who have been antagonists for decades if not centuries, can just pound a perfectly functioning government and political entity out of the ground in a few weeks, with president and all?

Please.
I never said what was shown on Enterprise was perfect!

Anway nobody said that the founding member created the Federation in a matter of weeks, nor was that ever implied or shown!

Yes, you did, yes it was. The moment you want a Federation president, and thus a functioning Federation government (which Journey to Babel clearly showed did not exist) existing from the very founding of the Federation, you indeed say that.

But something took these races where they put there differences aside to where they somehow created the Federation that we seen in all the ST series. Did it start out perfect? I am sure it did not, nor did I ever imply that the Federation or its founding members were. But can these races set aside there differences, make peace, and come together and create something?
I never said that they didn't, if I did, I would be calling all of Star Trek including TOS ridiculous and say a Federation could never be, it's idiotic.

I never said that, now did I?

What I said, that they wouldn't snap their fingers, and poof, they gave up every single last care, objection, problem, distrust they ever had, and let someone else, including those they hated so, rule over them, giving away most of their sovereignty.

What I said, is that they built the Federation piece by little piece, step by little step, brick by little brick, instead of just lowering a fully operational Federation down with a crane.

And no, we did NOT see the same Federation in all the series. A Federation that needs to send Starfleet to a member planet to protect it from another member is NOT the same unified, under one government Federation we saw a century later.

Sure they can! Simply take a look at the US & the Soviet Union, having The Cold War which was a period of conflict, tension and competition between these two countries and their respective allies from the mid-1940s until the early 1990s. But in a short period, peace was made between them. So if peace, cooperation, trade and other things can happen between these two countries that wanted to blow each other off the planet, then why can't 4 races from ST put aside there difference?
:lol:

You actually believe that shit?

Alright, fine - I admit it, there's a super government in place above the Soviet Union and the US that can order both their governments and presidents around. They have a unified military that is under the super government's control, while they themselves retain only minimal militias. And they only did that before a year after the wall fell was over.

:rolleyes:

Seriously, do you even BOTHER with such things as the news? The US and the Russians still don't like each other, they practically hate each other, and are thwarting each other economically and tossing around their UN veto rights to screw the other over all the time. They did not build a damn thing together, they're just trying to exploit each other to get a better economic position.

Again saying that Enterprise does not count and statements from other series are mistakes or that it does not jive with your interpretation is not good enough reason to disregard being so far you have not shown any real reasons to disregard any of the information except for that it does not back up your personnel opinions.
Please, go watch Journey to Babel again, and then bother to come back here.

anyone disagreeing with 3DMaster should save their effort. it's a waste of time. he's locked into his mind-set and won't budge. you'd get more sense talking to a brick wall...
This is very true, but its pretty funny seeing 3DMaster going on and on without any canon information. Its almost like he is getting his ideas from a book called "Star Trek according to 3DMaster". :rommie:

I've got canon information up the wazoo. But just because something wasn't literally spelled out before you, you refuse to accept that blatant canon information.

Anyone who watches Journey to Babel knows there is no Federation government and no Federation president. Anyone who can come away from that episode saying that there is, is either an idiot, or someone who stuck his fingers in his ears going, "Ladida! There's a Federation president, there's a Federation president! I don't care what this episode shows and says, I don't care how utterly DISunified the members are in this episode, there's a Federation president, and there's a unified government. Ladida!"
 
Last edited:
The rules say that posting more than two times can be considered spamming. Generally, it's considered poor form to post so many times in a row (especially when you're replying to the same poster anyway). It's just a consideration to other posters so the bulk of a page isn't taken up by your posts.

Actualy I do not see any rule saying that, but what it does say is this;

When quoting another poster please don't quote the whole of another message, but only the relevant parts. As a general rule, posts should contain at least 70% original material.

Which is what I was doing!

If you feel that I have done something wrong, then feel free to report me to the admin!
 
You mean 3 entire quarters of the episode, the whole ffing reason the summit was called? You know, the part where Sarek wants to let the planet join the Federation partially if not entirely because he wants Starfleet to be able to protect the planet from the Tellarites, a Federation member? Essentially being able to put up several war vessels to fight continued attempts by the Tellarite to exploit them? Showing the Federation can't order the Tellarites to stop abusing another member, but the only way to protect a member from a fellow member, is to fight a border skirmish with them?

That part? You know the reason why the Enterprise was attacked?

You know, the entire ffing episode?

You just proved my point, being there is nothing saying there was not a Federation President! :techman:
 
You mean 3 entire quarters of the episode, the whole ffing reason the summit was called? You know, the part where Sarek wants to let the planet join the Federation partially if not entirely because he wants Starfleet to be able to protect the planet from the Tellarites, a Federation member? Essentially being able to put up several war vessels to fight continued attempts by the Tellarite to exploit them? Showing the Federation can't order the Tellarites to stop abusing another member, but the only way to protect a member from a fellow member, is to fight a border skirmish with them?

That part? You know the reason why the Enterprise was attacked?

You know, the entire ffing episode?

You just proved my point, being there is nothing saying there was not a Federation President! :techman:

And you just proved my point, that you won't accept anything until there is a literal quote saying something - even if every single damn thing, including common sense, logic, everything in an episode, hell the entire episode, says something, if there's not a literal word for word quote you won't accept even the blatant obvious.

Only an idiot, or someone with his fingers in his ears - also rather an idiot, which you would be: that guy with the fingers - would say that. If there was a unified government with a president that had jurisdiction over the individual members, Starfleet would NEVER need to fight one of the members in defense of another member. This is simple logic, and blatantly obvious.

But keep your fingers in your ears, I'll keep my eyes and ears wide open, and my brain fully functional.
 
[qoute]One episode is hardly conclusive. Especially from way back in TOS, where a lot of the backstories were wildly inconsistent and had not yet been nailed down.

Except for the annoying fact that TOS in this matter is extremely consistent: with reality.

No they did not!

If I am wrong, feel free to post part of the transcript where there was no Federation President at the time of Journey to Babel.

You mean 3 entire quarters of the episode, the whole ffing reason the summit was called? You know, the part where Sarek wants to let the planet join the Federation partially if not entirely because he wants Starfleet to be able to protect the planet from the Tellarites, a Federation member? Essentially being able to put up several war vessels to fight continued attempts by the Tellarite to exploit them? Showing the Federation can't order the Tellarites to stop abusing another member, but the only way to protect a member from a fellow member, is to fight a border skirmish with them?

That part? You know the reason why the Enterprise was attacked?

You know, the entire ffing episode?



I don't need to prove a damn thing. The Coalition is from Enterprise. Enterprise is trash, we throw it on the trash heap.

I said - LATER. The Earlier Federation would indeed not be able to declare war in the traditional sense, but like the UN, they could make the decision that (all) members could go to war over something being bad enough.

Well they had to be able to declare war somehow! Anyway like I said the UN is not able to declare war even if every every member decided to which would never happen! Also it would be kind of hard for the UN to wage a war without a military!

:sighs: :rolleyes:

Please learn how to read.

I never said a damn thing about positions being permanent, I said the institution is consistent and permanent (in operation). If the Council that Ambassadors needed to go to was like US court, they never need to go their, because they would BE their, for the entire time of their term.

Well ether way I still stand by what I said, even if I did misread what you posted. Which was that the Federation does have a permanent branch, its called the Federation Council!!! Its like Congress which is a permanent legislative branch within or own government, the congress men or women are voted there to serve a certain term, just like a council man or an ambassador serving under what ever branch in the Federation.

So in the end the Federation does have a permanent legislative branch, they do have a government and they do have a president. :)



Nope, the Federation being a union of worlds is not a home world. Nor you can you represent something to itself.

And if you'd bother to use your brain, or learn how to read, you would understand this.

Sarek, did represent Vulcan - he's ambassador, he's not chose by its people. He represents Vulcan's government, he is their ambassador. If he represented Vulcan, he would have been chosen by its people, not appointed by its government, and as a result not carry the title ambassador.

So what your point? I never said anything that went against what you just said.

Nope, in TOS it did NOT have that branch. All those belonging on that council and doing the talking and voting, needed to GO there. That means, like I already said, but you don't seem to be able to read, so I'll repeat it again: it's like the UN. They are apart, away from each other, they simply are insubstantial, and only when something significant occurs, do they set up a meeting and a place to meet, give notice, and then those people, ambassadors, come and do their thing.

They are NOT like the US congress, in that they are voted in place, then move to go live in the city near the permanent building, and essentially work in/on this congress seven days a week.

Nothing of this sort is happening.

Nope, wrong again! I suggest YOU do some reading, being what you just said was all wrong. :guffaw:

Neither did the Federation. The Federation could not tell the Tellarites to stop exploiting the people of the planet that was vying for membership. The Tellarites could do whatever the hell they wanted to. The only thing the Federation could do, is approve of the the membership, and only once they were a member could they send in Starfleet to guard the planet from Tellarite exploitation - one of the Federation members. So even then, the Federation couldn't stop the Tellarites from attempting to continue their exploitation, except by stationing a permanent Starfleet guard that would protect the planet. Essentially the Federation waging a war against its own members merchants to stop it from illegally and immorally exploiting one of its fellow Federation members.

If the Federation had power over the member governments, all they had to do was order the Tellarites to stop, but they couldn't.

No government is perfect, no matter how powerful a government is. It always hard to stop a couple of ships or a couple of people. Also in Babel there was nothing that proved that the tellarites as a whole exploited anybody, if they did then the Federation could have done something.

Yes, you did, yes it was. The moment you want a Federation president, and thus a functioning Federation government (which Journey to Babel clearly showed did not exist) existing from the very founding of the Federation, you indeed say that.

No I did not say that, it would seem that now your the one having problems reading

I never said that they didn't, if I did, I would be calling all of Star Trek including TOS ridiculous and say a Federation could never be, it's idiotic.

I never said that, now did I?

What I said, that they wouldn't snap their fingers, and poof, they gave up every single last care, objection, problem, distrust they ever had, and let someone else, including those they hated so, rule over them, giving away most of their sovereignty.

What I said, is that they built the Federation piece by little piece, step by little step, brick by little brick, instead of just lowering a fully operational Federation down with a crane.

And no, we did NOT see the same Federation in all the series. A Federation that needs to send Starfleet to a member planet to protect it from another member is NOT the same unified, under one government Federation we saw a century later.

You said; "Do you really think, that completely different species, some who have been antagonists for decades if not centuries, can just pound a perfectly functioning government and political entity out of the ground in a few weeks, with president and all?" Of which I disagree with.

:lol:

You actually believe that shit?

Alright, fine - I admit it, there's a super government in place above the Soviet Union and the US that can order both their governments and presidents around. They have a unified military that is under the super government's control, while they themselves retain only minimal militias. And they only did that before a year after the wall fell was over.

:rolleyes:

Seriously, do you even BOTHER with such things as the news? The US and the Russians still don't like each other, they practically hate each other, and are thwarting each other economically and tossing around their UN veto rights to screw the other over all the time. They did not build a damn thing together, they're just trying to exploit each other to get a better economic position.

I suggest you read your history books again!

I also never said they loved or liked each other. I said that there is peace, cooperation, trade and other things.

Please, go watch Journey to Babel again, and then bother to come back here.

I suggest you do so, being so far your wrong.

anyone disagreeing with 3DMaster should save their effort. it's a waste of time. he's locked into his mind-set and won't budge. you'd get more sense talking to a brick wall...
This is very true, but its pretty funny seeing 3DMaster going on and on without any canon information. Its almost like he is getting his ideas from a book called "Star Trek according to 3DMaster". :rommie:

I've got canon information up the wazoo. But just because something wasn't literally spelled out before you, you refuse to accept that blatant canon information.

Anyone who watches Journey to Babel knows there is no Federation government and no Federation president. Anyone who can come away from that episode saying that there is, is either an idiot, or someone who stuck his fingers in his ears going, "Ladida! There's a Federation president, there's a Federation president! I don't care what this episode shows and says, I don't care how utterly DISunified the members are in this episode, there's a Federation president, and there's a unified government. Ladida!"

Yeah and so far nothing you have said is canon, its been only your opinion.

It would seem your the only one who watched Journey to Babel and thinks that there is no Federation government and no Federation president.

If there was no Government, then how can there be Ambassadors, Starfleet, and a Federation starship named Enterprise? Oh there was none of them also, right? :rolleyes:

Yeah, ok.
 
Last edited:
Except for the annoying fact that TOS in this matter is extremely consistent: with reality.

Ah, yes, and how many 'time barriers' are there IRL? :lol:

I don't need to prove a damn thing. The Coalition is from Enterprise. Enterprise is trash, we throw it on the trash heap.

Maybe *you* can, but that doesn't change the fact that it exists. Trek history must take it into account. You can ignore it as you wish, but I prefer not to hide my head in the sand. ENT's contributions to Trek will be acknowledged, like it or not.

Anyone who watches Journey to Babel knows there is no Federation government and no Federation president. Anyone who can come away from that episode saying that there is, is either an idiot, or someone who stuck his fingers in his ears going, "Ladida! There's a Federation president, there's a Federation president! I don't care what this episode shows and says, I don't care how utterly DISunified the members are in this episode, there's a Federation president, and there's a unified government. Ladida!"

You're the one going Ladida here, not anyone else.
 
You mean 3 entire quarters of the episode, the whole ffing reason the summit was called? You know, the part where Sarek wants to let the planet join the Federation partially if not entirely because he wants Starfleet to be able to protect the planet from the Tellarites, a Federation member? Essentially being able to put up several war vessels to fight continued attempts by the Tellarite to exploit them? Showing the Federation can't order the Tellarites to stop abusing another member, but the only way to protect a member from a fellow member, is to fight a border skirmish with them?

That part? You know the reason why the Enterprise was attacked?

You know, the entire ffing episode?

You just proved my point, being there is nothing saying there was not a Federation President! :techman:

And you just proved my point, that you won't accept anything until there is a literal quote saying something - even if every single damn thing, including common sense, logic, everything in an episode, hell the entire episode, says something, if there's not a literal word for word quote you won't accept even the blatant obvious.

Only an idiot, or someone with his fingers in his ears - also rather an idiot, which you would be: that guy with the fingers - would say that. If there was a unified government with a president that had jurisdiction over the individual members, Starfleet would NEVER need to fight one of the members in defense of another member. This is simple logic, and blatantly obvious.

But keep your fingers in your ears, I'll keep my eyes and ears wide open, and my brain fully functional.

Again wrong!

I simply won't accept what your saying because your simply stating your opinion, your belief. Its kind of hard to accept someones statement when that person does not provided any canon evidence and when that person also disregards anything that is canon. Its also hard to take a person seriously when he does not know how to use a little common sense or logic when stating something.

Point in case... Starfleet NEVER fought with one of it own members in defense of another member. This is simple logic, and blatantly obvious. :vulcan:
 
1)If the United Nations, a body made up of Ambassadors can have a President,then why can't the UFP? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/President_of_the_United_Nations_General_Assembly

2) Only 32 of the 114 delegates going to the Babel conference were Ambassadors. Obviously the various member worlds sent their top negotiators , some of whom were Ambassadors, to solve the Coridan problem. We have no idea if these are legislators, diplomats or just people of influence.
A formal reception tonight,114 delegates aboard for two weeks,32 of them ambassadors, half of them mad at the other half and everyone touchier than a raw antimatter pile over this Coridan question.

3) The UFP President has been a fixture of Star Trek since 1986 (The Voyage Home) The Federation Council is first mentioned in TOS (Amok Time) way back in 1967.

4) It's real easy to find this stuff. Especially in this wondrous age of Computers, the Internet and DVDS. No real need to use the Tellerite style of argumentation, when you have facts literally at your fingertips.
 
The rules say that posting more than two times can be considered spamming. Generally, it's considered poor form to post so many times in a row (especially when you're replying to the same poster anyway). It's just a consideration to other posters so the bulk of a page isn't taken up by your posts.

Actualy I do not see any rule saying that

Spamming:
You can't post the same thing multiple times on the board, or post the same thing over and over in a certain thread or forum, or continuously make posts that have no real content or relevance to what is being discussed. Spamming can even just be posting too much - as a general rule, don't post more than two or three threads in a forum within a reasonable length of time. Do not post more than twice in a row in the same thread. If you need to answer more than one person in the thread, please use the quote function.

If you feel that I have done something wrong, then feel free to report me to the admin!

I am the moderator here, so I don't have to report you. I actually get to do something if I feel it is wrong. Warning for Spamming. Send comments via PM.
 
Last edited:
Well, Robjkay, you've just proven yourself a complete, utter and total idiot that doesn't know a damn thing about anything. If you want to have ANY chance at redemption, you should start by watching Journey to Babel. My statements about that episode are not opinion, they are cold hard facts. And you obviously know NOTHING about it, because every thing you've said even remotely relating to the episode are FALSE.

1)If the United Nations, a body made up of Ambassadors can have a President,then why can't the UFP? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/President_of_the_United_Nations_General_Assembly

2) Only 32 of the 114 delegates going to the Babel conference were Ambassadors. Obviously the various member worlds sent their top negotiators , some of whom were Ambassadors, to solve the Coridan problem. We have no idea if these are legislators, diplomats or just people of influence.
A formal reception tonight,114 delegates aboard for two weeks,32 of them ambassadors, half of them mad at the other half and everyone touchier than a raw antimatter pile over this Coridan question.
3) The UFP President has been a fixture of Star Trek since 1986 (The Voyage Home) The Federation Council is first mentioned in TOS (Amok Time) way back in 1967.

4) It's real easy to find this stuff. Especially in this wondrous age of Computers, the Internet and DVDS. No real need to use the Tellerite style of argumentation, when you have facts literally at your fingertips.

:sighs: Which is NOT the president of the United Nations. Maybe you should learn to read. He's the president of the UN ASSEMBLY. Does anyone here talk about the president of the Federation Council? This is a person who presides over the Assembly's meetings and performs some PR functions, he however is NOT the head of a government, not in command of an executive branch, nor is he in ultimate command of a military.

Nope, we're talking about president of the Federation, PERIOD. In short, the function we saw in Deep Space Nine, and Star Trek VI. A function that IS the head of a government, IS in command of an executive branch, IS in ultimate command of a military, and is chosen by the people, and NOT picked by some representatives in a body that are NOT chosen by any people, and only presides over gatherings.

The two are completely different things.
 
Well, Robjkay, you've just proven yourself a complete, utter and total idiot that doesn't know a damn thing about anything. If you want to have ANY chance at redemption, you should start by watching Journey to Babel. My statements about that episode are not opinion, they are cold hard facts. And you obviously know NOTHING about it, because every thing you've said even remotely relating to the episode are FALSE.

1)If the United Nations, a body made up of Ambassadors can have a President,then why can't the UFP? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/President_of_the_United_Nations_General_Assembly

2) Only 32 of the 114 delegates going to the Babel conference were Ambassadors. Obviously the various member worlds sent their top negotiators , some of whom were Ambassadors, to solve the Coridan problem. We have no idea if these are legislators, diplomats or just people of influence.
A formal reception tonight,114 delegates aboard for two weeks,32 of them ambassadors, half of them mad at the other half and everyone touchier than a raw antimatter pile over this Coridan question.
3) The UFP President has been a fixture of Star Trek since 1986 (The Voyage Home) The Federation Council is first mentioned in TOS (Amok Time) way back in 1967.

4) It's real easy to find this stuff. Especially in this wondrous age of Computers, the Internet and DVDS. No real need to use the Tellerite style of argumentation, when you have facts literally at your fingertips.

:sighs: Which is NOT the president of the United Nations. Maybe you should learn to read. He's the president of the UN ASSEMBLY. Does anyone here talk about the president of the Federation Council? This is a person who presides over the Assembly's meetings and performs some PR functions, he however is NOT the head of a government, not in command of an executive branch, nor is he in ultimate command of a military.

Nope, we're talking about president of the Federation, PERIOD. In short, the function we saw in Deep Space Nine, and Star Trek VI. A function that IS the head of a government, IS in command of an executive branch, IS in ultimate command of a military, and is chosen by the people, and NOT picked by some representatives in a body that are NOT chosen by any people.

The two are completely different things.
So there is UFP President?

The point is an organization composed of Ambassadors can have a President. Not that the UN President and the UFP President have similar powers.

The President of the UFP would also appear to be the head of the Federation Council.
 
(Nothing to contribute today. I just really can't fathom how 3DMaster still isn't banned for his chronic lack of basic manners... Or common sense.)

Timo Saloniemi
 
So there is UFP President?

No, there isn't, until the late 23rd century.

The point is an organization composed of Ambassadors can have a President. Not that the UN President and the UFP President have similar powers.

Nope, the two are completely different things, as I've said over and over again. The dude in charge of the assembly, is NOT the Federation President. And it isn't the UN President either.

The President of the UFP would also appear to be the head of the Federation Council.

No, he/she is not.
 
So there is UFP President?

No, there isn't, until the late 23rd century.

The point is an organization composed of Ambassadors can have a President. Not that the UN President and the UFP President have similar powers.

Nope, the two are completely different things, as I've said over and over again. The dude in charge of the assembly, is NOT the Federation President. And it isn't the UN President either.

The President of the UFP would also appear to be the head of the Federation Council.

No, he/she is not.

Seriously, do you have some sort of learning disability that we should know about? Because people say one thing and you reinterpret it into something you want to hear and then comment on that.

1) The Office of the Federation President was establish as being created in 2161 at the founding of the United Federation of Planets. (STAR TREK GENERATIONS)

2) Just because the first time we see a UFP President is in The Voyage Home does not mean that he was the UFP's first President. Just because no one mentioned a UFP President in TOS doesn't mean the position did not exist at that time.

3) I mention the UN President as an example of a organization of Ambassadors lead by a President. Not to suggest a parallel between the UN and UFP and the role of the UN President and the UFP President.

4) From what we seen the role of the UFP President is similar to that of a Prime Minister in a Parliamentary form of Government. If you have evidence of the contrary please present it.
 
Seriously, do you have some sort of learning disability that we should know about? Because people say one thing and you reinterpret it into something you want to hear and then comment on that.

You should ask yourself that question, not me.

1) The Office of the Federation President was establish as being created in 2161 at the founding of the United Federation of Planets. (STAR TREK GENERATIONS)

Nope, it wasn't.

2) Just because the first time we see a UFP President is in The Voyage Home does not mean that he was the UFP's first President. Just because no one mentioned a UFP President in TOS doesn't mean the position did not exist at that time.

:sighs: It has nothing to do with seeing him the first time, it's got all to do with Journey to Babel. (Here we get learning disability.) I've explained it over and over again, go read it once more, watch Journey to Babel. Watching this episode, you know there's no unified government, and thus no President of the Federation.

3) I mention the UN President as an example of a organization of Ambassadors lead by a President. Not to suggest a parallel between the UN and UFP and the role of the UN President and the UFP President.

The UN is NOT led by a president. The UN is led by the Secretary-General. The "president of the UN Assembly", is nothing but the guy that keeps order during assembly. He gives people a turn to speak, and says when someone's turn is over. More often than no, this isn't even an ambassador or similar, he's simply a guy who keeps control of the assembly. He's a glorified referee.

The President of the Federation, is a leader of a government, the Commander and Chief of a military, the head of state, the leader of political entity.

These two are COMPLETELY different things, and have NOTHING to do with each other.

4) From what we seen the role of the UFP President is similar to that of a Prime Minister in a Parliamentary form of Government. If you have evidence of the contrary please present it.

Yeah, the UFP President is essentially the US president. And such a position simply does not exist during Journey to Babel, and thus before.
 
Well, Robjkay, you've just proven yourself a complete, utter and total idiot that doesn't know a damn thing about anything. If you want to have ANY chance at redemption, you should start by watching Journey to Babel. My statements about that episode are not opinion, they are cold hard facts. And you obviously know NOTHING about it, because every thing you've said even remotely relating to the episode are FALSE.

1)If the United Nations, a body made up of Ambassadors can have a President,then why can't the UFP? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/President_of_the_United_Nations_General_Assembly

2) Only 32 of the 114 delegates going to the Babel conference were Ambassadors. Obviously the various member worlds sent their top negotiators , some of whom were Ambassadors, to solve the Coridan problem. We have no idea if these are legislators, diplomats or just people of influence.
A formal reception tonight,114 delegates aboard for two weeks,32 of them ambassadors, half of them mad at the other half and everyone touchier than a raw antimatter pile over this Coridan question.
3) The UFP President has been a fixture of Star Trek since 1986 (The Voyage Home) The Federation Council is first mentioned in TOS (Amok Time) way back in 1967.

4) It's real easy to find this stuff. Especially in this wondrous age of Computers, the Internet and DVDS. No real need to use the Tellerite style of argumentation, when you have facts literally at your fingertips.

:sighs: Which is NOT the president of the United Nations. Maybe you should learn to read. He's the president of the UN ASSEMBLY. Does anyone here talk about the president of the Federation Council? This is a person who presides over the Assembly's meetings and performs some PR functions, he however is NOT the head of a government, not in command of an executive branch, nor is he in ultimate command of a military.

Nope, we're talking about president of the Federation, PERIOD. In short, the function we saw in Deep Space Nine, and Star Trek VI. A function that IS the head of a government, IS in command of an executive branch, IS in ultimate command of a military, and is chosen by the people, and NOT picked by some representatives in a body that are NOT chosen by any people, and only presides over gatherings.

The two are completely different things.

Actually its the Secretary General who is the head of the UN. But the priciple is still the same, being President or Secretary General is only a title that is used to refer to someone who is the head of something like the Federation or the UN.
 
4) From what we seen the role of the UFP President is similar to that of a Prime Minister in a Parliamentary form of Government. If you have evidence of the contrary please present it.

Yeah, the UFP President is essentially the US president. And such a position simply does not exist during Journey to Babel, and thus before.

Then who was in charge then? Who ordered the ambassadors & delegates together in Journey to Babel?

Who ordered the Enterprise to pick up he ambassadors & delegates?

Who does Capt. Kirk work for, and who do they answer to?

Starfleet in Journey to Babel, who controls SF?

During to Journey to Babel, if the Federation & Starfleet had to go to war. Who would make this decision?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top