• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Did Shatner turn down a cameo in ST XI?

VOODOOXI

Commander
Red Shirt
There are some indications (if you read between the lines) that would suggest that William Shatner MAY have turned down a cameo role in Star Trek XI.

Shatner is on record (Craig Ferguson show 11/27/06) as saying that "I met with J.J. an he wants me to be in the film". Shatner even let spoilers about the script slip when he mentioned that one issue the writers had was how were they going to get "old dead Kirk to speak to young Kirk" Why would Abrams discuss the plot with Shatner or even meet with him if he had zero interest in him?


Is it possible that Shatner was offered a small role and turned it down? Could Shatner have let his well known ego get in the way of his participation in this film because he was not the star? Or was it that Leonard Nimoy would be getting a far bigger paycheck for a much bigger role? Everyone is aware that Shatner has played hardball in negotiations with the studio, could this be his latest in a long line of tough negotiations? Think his appearance on Enterprise that never happened over a contract dispute. Did Shatner over play his hand?

A poster (TRexx) over at trekweb.com brought up some very valid points in regards to Shatner and the creative team behind ST XI.

Here are some excerpts from his well thought out arguments.

"In one Shatnervision video Shatner argues the case for "being worth the salary" Did he feel that Abrams cameo sized paycheck was unacceptable?

"A competent project manager (Abrams) avoids rousing false hope, especially among fans known to feel shafted by studio brass. Abrams did not put his creative credibility at risk- from the get go , he knew how to include Shatner in a bookend role. Nimoy alluded to this , when he spoke about the very first communication from Abrams back in autumn back in 2006"

" Unless team Abrams did fib it appears the door was left open for Shatner for many weeks after production had commenced- with Orci et al ready to include elder Kirk if Shat signed at the 11th hour"

"The evidence indicates that team Abrams larger goals were thwarted by Captain I don't do cameos"

Isn't it just common sense that such creative people found a way to get Shatner involved?

If a dope like myself can think of a million different ways to get Shatner involved in a story that involves alternate time lines and time travel, surely these very talented + creative people thought of a way to include Shatner.

Isn't it also common sense to think that they if they never wanted Shatner they would have simply said it from day one? Why string the die hard fans of Star Trek, Kirk and Shatner along? How would that serve them or this $100 million project? IT WOULDN'T.

My money says that they wanted Shatner for some type of cameo that he turned down. I'd bet that he wanted to be the star of the film or at the very least wanted to be paid the same amount as Nimoy who has a far bigger role in the film than what I think they may have offered Shatner. After all his character is dead. All of us Kirk fans would be have been thrilled with a 30 second cameo that showed Kirk was alive. Perhaps that wasn't good enough for Shatner?

In Shatner's defense I wouldn't doubt that a formal offer was never made, but they may have been so far apart from both a creative and financial point of view there was no need.

I think they wanted Shatner on their terms both financial and creative. I wouldn't be surprised if Shatner couldn't allow his ego and his pocketbook "I don't do cameo's" + "I'm worth the salary" to take the hit.

I just can't see the creative team being so public about their desire to have him in the film, but all the while knowing they had no interest in putting him in the movie. It makes no sense. These are not stupid people. They would know better than that.

Shatner claimed to want to be in the movie. The creative team claimed "desperately wanted him in the movie" So what gives?

There is more here than meets the eye. I think this is a case of where there is smoke there is fire. It will be interesting to hear what really went on behind the scenes in regards to Shatner and this film in the months and years to come. I would be very surprised to find out that they truly had no intention of including him.
 
Last edited:
If the Shat was in fact offered a cameo, the deciding factor would be whether or not JJ and co. would pay Shatner what he thinks he's worth to play Kirk again. So of course he'd turn them down.
 
you mean to say that all the people screaming and angry at the Abrams team about putting shat into the movie might have been aiming at the wrong target this whole time?

say it isn't so
 
IIRC, Shatner and Nimoy met with JJ before the script was written, but Shatner told him he didn't do cameos. Meaning that if JJ desperately wanted Shatner it had to be for a full-on role. The story that evolved afterwards had definite need of an elderly Spock, but not an already-dead Kirk, so Shatner wasn't required.
 
If it was a money issue, you'd think the Priceline Negotiator would have been able to figure out a deal that worked for both parties. :p
 
I'd say that's probably what happened. They probably wanted to squeeze him in for a cameo, and he either refused for business reasons.
 
That all sounds about right. And I also have to agree with Anthony that so many of us who wanted Shat to appear in the film even in the briefest of roles put blame toward the wrong side. I think they probably wouldn't have even met with WS and LN unless they wanted to include them originally. Sometimes these things happen, and even though I would have loved to have seen that cameo, at least we will still have Leonard to pass the torch.
 
If it was a money issue, you'd think the Priceline Negotiator would have been able to figure out a deal that worked for both parties. :p

:lol:

-- It seems unlikely it was about money. That presumes they got as far as talking about money.
-- If a cameo was possible, and it was saying, "I don't do cameos," that kept Shatner out of the movie, so be it. Nimoy was right to turn down being Spock in GEN for basically the same reason. But if this is the case, then Shatner shouldn't have been grousing about his exclusion.
-- If it was "Kirk's dead" so we can't use Shatner, well, this is science fiction. Death is only an inconvenience in science fiction. Though under these circumstances bringing Kirk back from the dead could've overwhelmed the movie.

That leaves the simplest and most boring answer as the most probable: the story just didn't need Shatner. In a cameo or otherwise.

I've always thought Abrams may have equivocated too long about Shatner having a part (saying for quite a while that they'd really like to get him in if they could). It kind of added fuel to the speculation that more may have been going on than met the eye in this area.
 
Is it possible that Shatner was offered a small role and turned it down? Could Shatner have let his well known ego get in the way of his participation in this film because he was not the star? Or was it that Leonard Nimoy would be getting a far bigger paycheck for a much bigger role?

Yes, all of that is more than possible. However, I don't think the emphasis was on money - the money was certainly there. The other factors and events you enumerate are...persuasive. ;)
 
If Shatner did turn down a part, Good For Him

Nimoy should have too.


let this new Star Trek stand on it's own without the Nimoy as Spock bait.
 
If Shatner did turn down a part, Good For Him

Nimoy should have too.


let this new Star Trek stand on it's own without the Nimoy as Spock bait.

I believe that they only brought Nimoy on for continuance. Sometimes I think that the Trek Universe has become too big and burdensome with too many consistency and continuity problems because of its size, that it gets harder and harder to write good stories for it. I wouldn't care if they trimmed it down and rebooted with this new movie and forget about continuance.
 
If it's anything like his rumored guest shot on ENT, he turned down an appearance because he wasn't consulted in creating the story. Also possibly the reason his Kirk/Spock Academy novels have reached a deadend... not jibing with how Abrams' is envisioning those events.
 
I've always thought Abrams may have equivocated too long about Shatner having a part (saying for quite a while that they'd really like to get him in if they could). It kind of added fuel to the speculation that more may have been going on than met the eye in this area.
That's some pretty good fuel, though, you must admit, if people are still talking about it nearly two years later in spite of almost overwhelming evidence of Shatner's non-involvement. Do you almost get the impression that some of them are planning now to show up on May 8, 2009 and sit through the whole movie anyway, hoping to spot that fleeting cameo?
 
I've always thought Abrams may have equivocated too long about Shatner having a part (saying for quite a while that they'd really like to get him in if they could). It kind of added fuel to the speculation that more may have been going on than met the eye in this area.

That's some pretty good fuel, though, you must admit, if people are still talking about it nearly two years later in spite of almost overwhelming evidence of Shatner's non-involvement. Do you almost get the impression that some of them are planning now to show up on May 8, 2009 and sit through the whole movie anyway, hoping to spot that fleeting cameo?

I think all three (Nimoy, Abrams, and even Shatner) realized this was good fuel. Or, to use another metaphor, they planted a seed.

I keep thinking back to a Nimoy interview very soon after it came out he was in the movie. Nimoy was quite flippant about Shatner not being in it. He laughed about it. Almost like teasing Shatner that there was no role for him. You couldn't help but think he wasn't being sincere. It was just too cruel in a way. It had to be a put-up job. Just based on that, I kept thinking the whole thing was a ruse. It would come out Shatner had a part. Everyone else also seemed so coy or insincere. What fans didn't have doubts at first?

Of course now I have no doubts Shatner isn't in the movie. But the seed has germanated and still grows in the minds of some fans. And, I have no doubt that on May 8 some determined ones will stay in their seats until the final credit rolls, the music stops, and the lights go up before give up on Shatner being in it.
 
I think all three (Nimoy, Abrams, and even Shatner) realized this was good fuel. Or, to use another metaphor, they planted a seed.
The sort of seed from which sprouts that flower called Free Publicity?

It wouldn't surprise me a bit. They're no dummies. ;)
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top