• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Why the assumption that the Earth/Romulan War Was 4 years long?

The Earth/Romulan war lasts twenty-five years and it was a century ago.

Did it start 125 years and end 100 years ago?
Did it start 100 years ago and end 75 years ago?
Did it start about 113 years ago and end around 88 years ago?

See what I mean? There's room for interpretation.
No, not really. Spock's exact words in "BOT" were:

"...the Neutral Zone [was] established by treaty after the Earth-Romulan conflict a century ago." (italics mine)

Furthermore, he explained that no one had breached the Neutral Zone in the time since the treaty was established. So one must allow for a full century between the end of the war and the time when the Romulans began their incursions in early 2267 (give or take a few years if you presume that Spock was rounding off the time span).


The subclause "a century ago" modifies "the Earth-Romulan conflict", not "established by treaty", so yes, there is room for interpretation. Thank Ghu some writer came up with the "Vulcans speak so precisely they go to two decimal places" tradition by the second season of TOS. :)


Besides pushing the war to the distant past, we could choose to belittle it. That, too, would be a good way to ensure that it is forgotten except by the fanatical few. And it would make sense that a conflict between the primitive Earthlings of yore, and an opponent those Earthlings could handle, would be a very forgettable one. Perhaps something that ended the very moment the big boys like Vulcans or Andorians stepped in - but still something that meant a lot to Earth specifically.


Not a bad notion, but if I recall correctly, in one of the Dominion War episodes of DS9 someone said the Federation hadn't fought a war on this scale since the Earth-Romulan conflict, implying that it too was a major interstellar war, not a minor skirmish.


Marian
 
...someone said the Federation hadn't fought a war on this scale since the Earth-Romulan conflict

Actually, when Sisko in "Homefront" says to the President that the Jem'Hadar will be "waging the kind of war that Earth hasn't seen since the founding of the Federation", he's apparently speaking about their cruelty, not about the scale of the war. His two preceding sentences are all about how the Jem'Hadar are brutal, won't care about human conventions of war, and won't limit themselves to military targets.

So a 9/11-type strike or Nanjing-type massacre would perhaps fit the Romulan War bill better than a full WWII-type conflict would...

OTOH, Earth doesn't seem to have been in a particularly grave danger in the Romulan War, as Leyton in the episode argues that the last time it was that bad was in WWIII. But that doesn't mean it wasn't bad in absolute terms in the RW, as apparently also the Whale Probe attack which possibly killed hundreds of thousands ranks below WWIII in Leyton's mind.

Timo Saloniemi
 
...someone said the Federation hadn't fought a war on this scale since the Earth-Romulan conflict

Actually, when Sisko in "Homefront" says to the President that the Jem'Hadar will be "waging the kind of war that Earth hasn't seen since the founding of the Federation", he's apparently speaking about their cruelty, not about the scale of the war. His two preceding sentences are all about how the Jem'Hadar are brutal, won't care about human conventions of war, and won't limit themselves to military targets.

So a 9/11-type strike or Nanjing-type massacre would perhaps fit the Romulan War bill better than a full WWII-type conflict would...

OTOH, Earth doesn't seem to have been in a particularly grave danger in the Romulan War, as Leyton in the episode argues that the last time it was that bad was in WWIII. But that doesn't mean it wasn't bad in absolute terms in the RW, as apparently also the Whale Probe attack which possibly killed hundreds of thousands ranks below WWIII in Leyton's mind.

Timo Saloniemi

To say nothing of the Xindi Attack of 2153. (Though perhaps the Xindi attack is what Sisko is thinking of when he says that a Dominion invasion of Earth will be unlike anything Earth's seen since the Founding.)
 
The Earth/Romulan war lasts twenty-five years and it was a century ago.

Did it start 125 years and end 100 years ago?
Did it start 100 years ago and end 75 years ago?
Did it start about 113 years ago and end around 88 years ago?

See what I mean? There's room for interpretation.
No, not really. Spock's exact words in "BOT" were:

"...the Neutral Zone [was] established by treaty after the Earth-Romulan conflict a century ago." (italics mine)

Furthermore, he explained that no one had breached the Neutral Zone in the time since the treaty was established. So one must allow for a full century between the end of the war and the time when the Romulans began their incursions in early 2267 (give or take a few years if you presume that Spock was rounding off the time span).
I see your point, but it could still be interpreted differently. That said I don't mind the idea of the war starting 125 years ago and ending 100 years ago.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top