No accounting for taste. On the candle or on wanting to watch inane arguments.So does my $100 candle
Doesn't mean we can't enjoy it
Be that as it may (and it's been several years since I last saw either of the two episodes relevant to the thread),
1. Geordi (and get the damn spelling right; the only "Geordie" in Star Trek is the non-canonical Lt. Francis Drake Reed's non-canonical nickname for George Samuel Kirk the Elder) conjured up Leah and her lab in a desperate bid for inspiration to solve a problem, and asked the holodeck computer to approximate her personality in hopes that doing so would improve the inspiration (it did; he solved the problem). And the side-effects kind of anticipated what anybody here who's ever interacted with an AI has probably experienced first hand. As well as echoing the interactions between Riker and Minuet while the Bynars were borrowing the ship.
2. While I would hardly call Leah a "shrew" or a "hag," she did beam aboard with a chip on her shoulder over Geordi's modifications to "her" engines, and was contemptuous of him at every turn (I can't picture Larry Marvick treating Scotty that way; then again, at least according to Diane Carey's "Captain April and Geordie Kirk" books, Marvick had more field experience than Dr. Brahms). I don't remember Geordi having to be told more than once that romantic overtures weren't welcome, and I can't imagine that Dr. Brahms would never have encountered unintended aberrant behavior in a holodeck simulation.
She was predisposed to think the worst of Geordi, and the holodeck simulation simply gave her one more reason to do so. But when the circumstances forced them to work together to solve another problem threatening the ship, he was all business, and she seems to have picked up on that.

