• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

The Mandalorian and Grogu (2026)

I watched this for the first time tonight on Disney +.

Was not the best movie, more like a collection of several decent episodes. I was fairly entertained. Personally, I think the script could have used one more polish pass. Grogu's inconsistent use of his force abilities was a bit glaring. One minute he's stuck in a bird cage and the next he's levitating a Hut? Really? Anyways, cute in parts, funny in others, overall decent action too. I was entertained; that's all I hoped for going in. 7/10

That pretty much sums up my thoughts.
 
It's better than the Sequels but not as good as the two other standalone movies. It fits more or less at near the center of the Disney Era movies.
 
Saw it on D+ today. A very boring movie, its like 3 mediocre episodes mixed together with absolutely no stakes or any real sense of danger. A few of the action scenes are ok, but overall I'd legitimately say this is my second least favorite star Wars film after Solo (not counting TCW movie, which I don't really count as a real SW film in the traditional sense). TM&G is a much better movie then Solo, but besides that I think all the other movies are better. Even Episodes II and IX felt like important things happened and there were stakes.

To be clear I really like The Mandalorian show, I even really enjoy Season 3 which seems to have a poor reputation. But this movie didn't make me feel anything but bored for 95% of its run time. It just feels like Filoni playing with his toys and putting them back in the box no different then when he took them out (except he added a weird buff Hutt toy, I guess).
 
Still enjoy this film. Genuine tension and emotional with Grogu on his own. A solid adventure film.

My only real annoyance was the giant droid guards. Everything else paced well, interwoven very well, solid story.
 
The Giant droid guards may be the last major work from the Tippett Studio for Star Wars, so there is that.

I found there to be stakes in the story, but that is because I think of the wider narrative with the Imperial Remnant and the return of Thrawn in Ahsoka.
 
Honestly, finally saw this and… this isn’t a Star Wars movie. It’s a cable TV action movie (with a budget, but still). Meh.
 
Honestly, finally saw this and… this isn’t a Star Wars movie. It’s a cable TV action movie (with a budget, but still). Meh.

Given that, at this point, there are over 440 canonical Star Wars TV episodes and shorts and only 13 canonical Star Wars movies, I question whether this is a meaningful distinction.
 
The Giant droid guards may be the last major work from the Tippett Studio for Star Wars, so there is that.

I found there to be stakes in the story, but that is because I think of the wider narrative with the Imperial Remnant and the return of Thrawn in Ahsoka.
Indeed. I don't know how there are not stakes. Mandalorian has kept showing the limits of the New Republic and it's really interesting to see, especially since Mando repeatedly shows power players being removed and the resulting challenges from that.

Honestly, finally saw this and… this isn’t a Star Wars movie. It’s a cable TV action movie (with a budget, but still). Meh.
So, The Phantom Menace then?
 
Given that, at this point, there are over 440 canonical Star Wars TV episodes and shorts and only 13 canonical Star Wars movies, I question whether this is a meaningful distinction.

I’d argue there is a recognizable “Star Wars feel” that this didn’t have, but I realize that that way lies “No true Star Trek” and so on. But somehow everything from the story beats to the musical style — despite the score being by the same guy who did the series — felt very not-Lucasfilm cable (and rather SyFy) to me. It’s subjective, of course; I wouldn’t know how to define it.
 
Oh, I disagree. It was stilted acting mixed with weird spectacle. The hype was ridiculous; the film was not Star Wars.

See, there I’d disagree — sure the acting was stilted, but it was clearly deeply felt for Lucas (and a fundamental part of the story). As with any of the Star Warses, while there was plenty of action in it, I wouldn’t call it an “action film”, and certainly not a cable one. Whereas TM&G literally felt like a “programmer” that happened to be set in the Star Wars universe.
 
Last edited:
See, there I’d disagree — sure the acting was stilted, but it was clearly deeply felt for Lucas (and a fundamental pet of the story). As with any of the Star Warses, while there was plenty of action in it, I wouldn’t call it an “action film”, and certainly not a cable one. Whereas TM&G literally felt like a “programmer” that happened to be set in the Star Wars universe.
Yeah, TPM felt nothing like Star Wars to me
 
TM&G isn't anything seismic or trendsetting, but at least it's not TROS. It's innocuous and mostly good, harmless fun.
This. Not every Star Wars movie has to change the face of cinema forever. I thought it dragged just a little in the middle, but I really enjoyed myself watching it.

And, much like Masters of the Universe, this movie did the job that the studios really wanted it to do -- sell merchandise.
 
TM&G isn't anything seismic or trendsetting, but at least it's not TROS. It's innocuous and mostly good, harmless fun.

Well, I know I’m the way outlier on this, but I thought TROS was better than it’s given credit for. What happens in that story matters; a programmer it ain’t.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top