I do wonder what the commentators mean when they say Axanar is what Trek should be. Like, do they want documentary-style storytelling? More than likely they're just happy to see ships and costumes from their childhood, with little thought to the actual story being told by Peters.
There’s a certain formality (to coin a phrase) to pre-2009 Star Trek. Professionalism, verisimilitude, competency porn, call it what you will (and by ENT it had ossified into a sort of pervasive stiff awkwardness). The formalism in the dialog (when it was done well) gave Trek a sense of timelessness. There was an attention to detail, both in terms of procedures and production that made the setting feel more real. Axanar (and most fan works, by definition) prioritizes what’s come before in a way that rewards familiarity with the franchise and active viewing. From a certain perspective, doing the opposite punishes paying attention.
Like, SNW has had flashbacks to events during and before DSC. You’d expect Starfleet characters to be wearing DSC uniforms and holding DSC props, especially since DSC established that the TOS-inspired styles were brand new. And yet, every time, they use the same costumes and props they use normally, without making any effort to call back to the prior show, to give that frisson of recognition to the audience.
TNG did it, breaking out the uncomfortable season 1/2 uniforms for flashbacks and photos showing that era. Even TOS, which didn’t really have bandwidth to do something like that lucked into it by showing “The Cage” as a flashback, and giving civilian characters the lasers from the pilot instead of normal hand phasers, introducing a little more depth to the setting.
Even just boiler-plate dialog, like a “medical team to the transporter room” after beaming up someone who’s been injured is elided (if you give the benefit of the doubt) or overlooked (if you don’t) as a matter of course.
Axanar emulates a Star Trek argot very well, and that idiom is out of style in current media, where the fashion for the last couple decades has swung hard into the quippy and informal, even for stories about, say, highly trained, highly regimented experts doing a difficult job where they need to keep their heads on straight. I saw a post a few weeks ago about a teenager seeing the beginning of “The Fellowship of the Ring” and being surprised and disoriented that the opening narration didn’t have any sort of joke or puncturing of the narrative gravity, just because ironic detachment and subversion has become so ubiquitous. You literally can’t be serious nowadays.
I’m no hater, I like a lot about a lot of Trek from the last decade and a half, but most of it is absolutely missing that special something. I’ve suggested sending Trek writers on a sail training course as a team-building and research exercise, just to help it sink in that living on and crewing a ship isn’t just like bullshitting around with your buddies in the living room, and they need to develop a sense of when to take things seriously and how to transport the audience outside their everyday world to that kind of environment, with all its little specific quirks that make it feel distinctive yet still realistic.