It's still their planet. They found it and they colonized it before the Federation even existed, let alone made an arbitrary claim on the territory.Because, at least according to the admiral, it means that the prime directive does not apply.
It's still their planet. They found it and they colonized it before the Federation even existed, let alone made an arbitrary claim on the territory.Because, at least according to the admiral, it means that the prime directive does not apply.
Which is a good argument against this feeling like a two-hour episode of the series. Because the series (hopefully) would have taken a more thoughtful approach to this whole situation.That's what Television Picard would do.
He had second and third thoughts in Pen Pals and eventually agreed to intervene
And because Sarjenka specifically asked Data for help. Picard couldn't ignore it. It's actually a pretty well constructed episode, but Data did play dirty - even though nobody called him on itBut only because Data had been violating the Prime Directive by communicating with the planet for weeks, and guilt-trips Picard with a message from Sarjenka.
He accepts the Prime Directive says that they cannot help the Boraalans, and is really not happy when Worf’s brother intervenes.
At times I wonder if the Original Sin of the NextGen films is that they were made by a television producer and written by television writers, and all of them best known for their connection to Star Trek.Which is the fundamental problem with the whole endeavour. Piller wants to tell a TNG story that Stewart has no interest in being a part of.
Nick Meyer and Leonard Nimoy, right?No one gonna mention the time they hired a big-time "movie writer" and mid-time "movie director" for the fourth film?![]()
Pretty sure it's the 4th TNG film - meaning John Logan and Stuart Baird.Nick Meyer and Leonard Nimoy, right?
Nemesis. John Logan and Stuart Baird teaming up to arguably prove that hiring "TV writers" and "TV directors" for the previous TNG films wasn't such a bad idea after all.Nick Meyer and Leonard Nimoy, right?
That's why I personally don't think it's the direction that sank Nemesis. There's nothing particularly egregious about the directing. It's the "Patrick and Brent get to have their say!" script and the final decisions on the edit that cooked that turkey.He was an good workman action director
Pretty sure it's the 4th TNG film - meaning John Logan and Stuart Baird.
Ah, my subtle humour was too subtle!Nemesis. John Logan and Stuart Baird
Executive Decision and US Marshals were both solid actioners. ED in particular was very well done. Baird just had zero interest in getting any background on TNG, so he thought Geordi was an alien, etc. And yes, Stewart and Spiner had story approval and it's obvious that's not a good thing.That's why I personally don't think it's the direction that sank Nemesis. There's nothing particularly egregious about the directing. It's the "Patrick and Brent get to have their say!" script and the final decisions on the edit that cooked that turkey.
Wasn't Star Trek 2 made by Paramount's television division?
The Bak'u weren't indigenous to that planet.It does have some good star trek philosophising - the argument of indigenous rights over the needs of the many with the massive medical benefits from the planet's radiation. Do two wrongs make a right.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.