Fiction is mutable. Overwriting is how long term franchise evolve. From Homer's Odyssey to Nolan's Odyssey that's how it's alway been.
In most instances, when a follow up is done, it is its own story. Its own thing.
Fiction is mutable. Overwriting is how long term franchise evolve. From Homer's Odyssey to Nolan's Odyssey that's how it's alway been.
Go to Paramount+. The home of Star Trek. They aren't there. They also were replaced on any broadcasts. The vast majority of viewers will never see them as they were originally intended.
Sorry for the sidebar.
Not in serial fiction like TV shows, books and comic books. .In most instances, when a follow up is done, it is its own story. Its own thing.
Not in serial fiction like TV shows, books and comic books. .
Chapel was a spear carrier/NPC/supernumerary in almost every scene she was in. Don't mistake that for characterization. She was there to hand McCoy instruments and on occasion contribute to a plot, often in ways that could have easily been performed by another character.
Does it matter how long the gap was? Seems like a goal post got shifted. Roy Thomas' Invaders and All-Star Squadron series picks up on Golden Age Marvel and DC continuity some thirty years after the fact. Asimov returned to his Foundation series also thirty years later in sequels and prequels (and made changes). The James Bond book series was revived in the 1980s and set in the same continuity as the Fleming books. I'm sure there are more.Do we have any that picked up a series after sixty years and tried to present it as all the same?
Does it matter how long the gap was?


Why? Especially in a fictional world set in the future? Star Trek isn't not should not ever be a period piece. Do current TOS novels read like something from the 1960s?Yeah, I would think so. The world and everything about us are totally different than they were sixty years ago.
I've taken quite the beating and am calling it a night.![]()
Same. TOS is the best era.As a lifelong TOS fan, I'm ok with that.
Exactly. Nothing is lost of the original. They can still be watched if people want to. People can just treat as an alternative timeline, which had multiple extremely easy outs inside Star Trek even before SNW aired.don’t see anyone doing that. Adding to it? Sure. Developing characters, adding and changing context and depth? Absolutely. But no one is overwriting the original Star Trek.
Because for some reason for some people it isn't enough that they can consider something an alternate timeline it must be an official declaration so other people are not allowed to treat it as being in the same timeline.People can just treat as an alternative timeline, which had multiple extremely easy outs inside Star Trek even before SNW aired.
But, no. The argument persists because...
Which is why making new shows set in the TOS era that closely resemble TOS would make no fucking sense.Yeah, I would think so. The world and everything about us are totally different than they were sixty years ago.
I've taken quite the beating and am calling it a night.![]()
I literally watched “What Are Little Girls Made Of?” the other day. I actually watched the opening scene very carefully. I had no problem with any of it. Both Kirk and Spock’s reaction when Chapel ask if Spock had ever been engaged before works. Uhura is excited for Christine, the two share a moment before Chapel and Kirk leave the bridge. Kirk hasn’t met Kirby at this point and that matches. The knowledge that Spock knows Kirby isn’t relevant to the conversation at hand but there’s no reason that discussion didn’t happen offscreen. By the time Spock beams to the surface, the android Kirby is dead.
Again, use some critical thinking to try to come up with a way it can work outside of a surface level view. Just because something changes the context of something else doesn’t mean it doesn’t work.
Critical thinking is rapidly becoming an endangered skill set.
Not in serial fiction like TV shows, books and comic books.
It's not particularly uncommon in superhero comic books for one writer to retcon another writer's story from 20-30 years before.Do we have any that picked up a series as a prequel, after sixty years and tried to present it as all the same?
Do we have any that picked up a series as a prequel, after sixty years and tried to present it as all the same?
Which is why making new shows set in the TOS era that closely resemble TOS would make no fucking sense.
The Cage establishes the crew compliment as 203 (which is kept consistent in Discovery). TOS revises that number to 430. The ship remains the same size, so it stands to reason the increase in crew compliment translates to subdividing the larger cabins to the smaller ones we later see in TOS. Even Pike's quarters in The Cage is larger than Kirk's, so there's even more evidence, and that's not even taking SNW into account.Connies in pike and kirks era didnt have huge quarters for the crew even the captain. That was mentioned in DS9. But now it has bigger crew quarters rivaling or surpassing the D.
In what way?and in some ways more advancef than the D
It's almost like it it aren't that hard.The Cage establishes the crew compliment as 203 (which is kept consistent in Discovery). TOS revises that number to 430. The ship remains the same size, so it stands to reason the increase in crew compliment translates to subdividing the larger cabins to the smaller ones we later see in TOS. Even Pike's quarters in The Cage is larger than Kirk's, so there's even more evidence, and that's not even taking SNW into account.
There, easily explained using the visual and audio evidence we've got.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.