As did I.Depends on where you were. I was in Jr. High and High School and I heard my share of racial or sexuality related slurs aimed at people who performed or liked disco.
As did I.Depends on where you were. I was in Jr. High and High School and I heard my share of racial or sexuality related slurs aimed at people who performed or liked disco.
It was applied to a number of non-white artists and groups Disco efforts. This was the 70s....But I still don't remember racism being applied to disco...
)I guess I was too busy with art school to notice.It was applied to a number of non-white artists and groups Disco efforts. This was the 70s.
(And yes, all types of racist and sexual orientation slurs were used.)
I was in high school, and I missed that part of it entirely. I only saw "Disco sucks!" coming from the kids who wanted to be cool and tough. They wanted to be seen as defiant, rebellious rockers, while disco had an upbeat, sincere enthusiasm about it. That's all it was in my home town.It was applied to a number of non-white artists and groups Disco efforts. This was the 70s.
(And yes, all types of racist and sexual orientation slurs were used.)
Disco sucked and ALWAYS sucked.
I can and still do. I enjoy 60s and very early 70s Rock. Once the Disco influences start appearing...If you can say that about this groove then I have no hope for you.

I can and still do. I enjoy 60s and very early 70s Rock. Once the Disco influences start appearing...![]()
Is that music by Soong-type androids?A tangent, but I guess it relates to both being Gen X/an 80s teen and listening to music: Is it weird that I suddenly seem to be getting into synthwave? (I gather this was seen at one point to have been somehow co-opted by the hard right, but at this point what hasn’t been?)
It… could be…Is that music by Soong-type androids?
I guess I was too busy with art school to notice.
I apparently missed it too, not only growing up in the 70s but also in the Navy. It was about what was being produced, not about who was producing it, if the subject moved beyond the "Disco Sucks!" stage.I was in high school, and I missed that part of it entirely.
Now I'll preface this by reminding everybody that my taste in music runs to classical and to strictly-acoustic forms of jazz.
In the early 1980s, while I was a student at CSU Long Beach, I took a summer music appreciation class (at a local junior college, since it was much, much cheaper, and I had no reason to apply the credits to my degree). The professor teaching the class was a working jazz pianist. He basically nailed punk and new-wave, simply by pointing out that it's all "three-chord music." Very basic, indeed, downright crude. Nothing the least bit "new" about "new-wave; it was old-hat in Bach's era.
I will also point out that classical music is the precise opposite of "elevator music." Elevator music is very static. It has themes, but they don't go anywhere or do anything. Classical music is all about developing themes, the way fiction develops characters. So is good jazz. So is good any-other-kind-of-music. The good stuff has, so to speak, a plot to it. People don't listen to classical music because it's "by dead guys"; people listen to it (and rock musicians are always cribbing off of it) because it has staying power. It continues to speak to us even though it's "by dead guys." And until the 20th century, composers didn't write intentionally unpopular music; if they did that, they wouldn't eat. They only started doing that in the 20th cenury because jaded, pretentious snobs wanted something exclusive, something that would be intentionally off-putting to "the common people." The most relaxing piece of classical music I know, the piece I bring along with me when I'm traveling by sleeping car, is Smetana's Ma Vlast, a suite of short tone poems about his homeland. The most famous of them, The Moldau, that traces the titular river from its source to the point where it empties into the ocean, particularly so. But while they're profoundly relaxing, there's nothing the slightest bit boring about them.
Elevator music is boring by design.
Be all of that as it may, my objection to disco is that, for all intents and purposes, it's "elevator music with a beat." Like elevator music, it's boring by design. You're not expected to pay any attention to it. And when it riffs off earlier material, it rarely shows it much respect. Certainly not the kind of respect that The Hampton String Quartet or John ("Bach on Abbey Road") Bayless showed in their Beatles covers. Nor the kind of respect Wendy Carlos showed in Switched-On Bach. By contrast, Walter Murphy's A Fifth of Beethoven takes one theme from the first movement of Beethoven's 5th, and just sits on it, without actually going anywhere with it. Hooked On Classics (or "Hooked On" anything else) just strings together a bunch of unrelated snippets over a drum track.

Okay, now who will fess up that they actually tried to imitate Travolta’s walking to Stayin’ Alive at some point?![]()
Even Satie's Gymnopédie No.1 (what Picard was listening to while waiting out the auto-destruct in Where Silence Has Lease), and minimalist pieces like Philip Glass's Mad Rush, have a certain amount of development (and indeed, the Satie has quite a bit of it for a 3 1/2 minute piece, and while the development in the Glass happens at a snail's pace, it does happen).Eric Satie, who arguably was a classical composer, said his piano pieces were "wallpaper music". It's just there to make the room more comfortable while something else takes place in this room.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.