• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

The Maple Leaf Lounge

Suprised that she's in favour of Alberta staying as part of Canada,

Thought she'd be all gung-ho a the idea of being president of the new nation of Albert.

... just before it was swallowed up by the U.S.

She constantly talks out of both sides of her mouth, according to what she thinks the one listening to her wants to hear.

In reality, I'm sure she's like Jason Kenney, seeing her stint as premier of Alberta as the stepping stone needed to get into federal politics. This idiotic, demented sociopath sees herself as Prime Ministerial material (if you feel like throwing up, read her FB feed where hundreds of her loyalists tell her this multiple times a day, every day).

But if she can't be Prime Minister of Canada, she'll settle for being Queen of Alberta (if we separate there wouldn't be any more connection to the monarchy and she can make herself queen if she wants) or Governor of Alberta (if we become the 51st state). Or she'd also be happy with president of an independent Alberta and she's delusional enough to think any other country in the world would recognize us.

Honestly, it wouldn't upset me if Carney called in the military if it gets that far. There's a reason why her nicknames include "Trumpette", "Trump in Heels", "Yankie-Doodle Dani", and "Smitler". No sane Albertan trusts her.

She's been flip-flopping on the issue. I think that's her wanting to have her cake and eat it too. She's all-in until the heat gets to her, then it's back to saying she's in favour of staying as part of Canada. There's even that infamous picture of her with T and O'Leary at Mar-A-Lago, which doesn't at all scream backdoor dealings, no sir. I think she's stuck in a reality where should the Separatists win, she would likely lose her power.

Even before she became premier, there's this backroom organization called Take Back Alberta, where their members were pushing to get themselves elected to school boards (gotta get that science and inclusiveness stuff out of the schools, get religion into the schools, and get those book bans going). One of them slithered onto our local city council over a year ago in a byelection and was re-elected in the fall. They strut around and say that they're the "Election Police" because they could get positions as scrutineers and could therefore decide whose vote would and wouldn't be counted (because the votes were counted by hand).

I've been a Deputy Returning Officer enough times to know what scrutineers are and are not allowed to do. They can object to a ballot being either accepted or rejected, but only within reason. They can't object to all the ballots for a specific candidate, for example. And they aren't allowed to physically touch the ballots.

Or just doesn't care. Poilievre is widely reviled too, yet he still clings to leadership.



American exceptionalism is a hell of a drug.

This administration pulls this kind of thing with us all the time.

US: Puts a bunch of tariffs on us under some flimsy national security excuse to circumvent CUSMA
Canada: In retaliation to those unjustified tariffs, several provinces remove US alcohol from their shelves
US: "How f***ing DARE you do this to us!! :mad:"



She's certainly given enough assists to the separatists. Her words may say one thing, but her actions say another.



I mean, the separatists are already bleating about how they're going to work to depose her as UCP leader because her referendum question about having a referendum wasn't sufficiently pro-separatist enough.

Personally, I'd like this to be the rift that ends up tearing the UCP apart, and they can split back into two separate parties again, one for the PCs, and another for the crazies. Of course, I'd like to see the same thing happen federally, too. Still waiting.

The PCs are dead in Alberta. Any PC loyalists were purged during Jason Kenney's first year, and at some point either early this year or late last year, Smitler made it illegal for any other political party to use "Progressive" in its name. So anyone trying to revive the Progressive Conservatives wouldn't be able to.
 
This idiotic, demented sociopath sees herself as Prime Ministerial material (if you feel like throwing up, read her FB feed where hundreds of her loyalists tell her this multiple times a day, every day).

Delusional. If the rest of Canada didn't hate her before (spoiler: they did), this whole mess has left more people thinking of her as "traitor", rather than "prime minister".

I mean, if you poke a bear to see what would happen, and you keep poking at it until it tears your arm off, that's completely on you, because congratulations you've managed to anger a bear. And if that happens, you don't turn around and do it again with another bear, unless you haven't learned from your first mistake, which might lead you to lose both of your arms.

Well, at least that makes poking a third bear more difficult?

---

Clare Blackwood's take on Danielle Smith is always good for a laugh. Note there is some NSFW language, as there always is in her Smith videos.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
She forgot the word "woke". Smitler loves trashing the people she calls "woke" (people who are public school teachers, disabled, LGBT, low-income seniors, indigenous, Justin Trudeau, and everyone else who she hates because we're not vicious, greedy sociopaths like her).
 
Gotta love how the word has stopped really meaning anything. It's ironic really, because in the chronic misuse of the word in an attempt to label everything they dislike as woke, they've managed to weaken the word and its meaning, thus their arguments.

Well, at least that makes poking a third bear more difficult?

Oh, that wouldn't likely stop them. They'd likely proceed to kick it, and well.... ;)
 
Gotta love how the word has stopped really meaning anything. It's ironic really, because in the chronic misuse of the word in an attempt to label everything they dislike as woke, they've managed to weaken the word and its meaning, thus their arguments.



Oh, that wouldn't likely stop them. They'd likely proceed to kick it, and well.... ;)
We'll call it a draw.
 
Gotta love how the word has stopped really meaning anything. It's ironic really, because in the chronic misuse of the word in an attempt to label everything they dislike as woke, they've managed to weaken the word and its meaning, thus their arguments.

The word is actually very useful. Once a politician utters it, I know that I no longer have to take them or their opinions seriously.

---

Well, would you look at this?


Hoekstra "doesn't understand" why we're frustrated. To quote McCoy in TUC, "I'd give real money if he'd shut up". So sick of hearing from this "diplomat" who doesn't seem to know the first thing about diplomacy.

This one, I'm just sharing because I find it amusing. In this CTV article, they report that Premier Smith promises not to have a second referendum if the "remain in Canada" wins the first referendum:


The article looks pretty normal now. But when it was first posted, it looks like they accidentally left an editorial note in the article itself, at the end of the first paragraph:

story-with-notes-still-present.png


I know these things happen sometimes; I just find it amusing when they do.
 
The word is actually very useful. Once a politician utters it, I know that I no longer have to take them or their opinions seriously.

On that point, you are quite right. At least it becomes useful in that manner. On the other hand, it's quite tiring to see the same line being uttered and I can't wait until we that trend wears itself out.

I regards to Hoekstra, yeah, I actually read the article version of that earlier today. To me it's just proof that they are unwilling to listen and understand why this whole thing upsets us. And they'll never understand as long as they aren't open to admitting they made a mistake. Interestingly, his comments about the alcohol removal also points to them not understanding why it was done. It wasn't done in regards to tariffs; it was in response to the grassroots effort to buy local because of how fed up we were with the attitude against us. Hoekstra is a guy that seems to dig himself a hole every time he opens his mouth, showing an appalling lack of understanding, both for our Country and for his role. You would think that an Ambassador's job would be to know the Country he is sent to, and least of all, know not to become party to any form of aggression towards that Country, but here he is, doing the opposite of what his job entails him to do. An ambassador's job should be in being a bridge between Countries and find ways forward. Instead, whenever we try to move forward, the goal posts keep moving.
 
I posted this GuardThe Leaf video in another area of the forum (where I suspect most of you here haven't opted in), so please don't take it as spamming. GtL is a guy from Vancouver, BC (currently lives and works in Malaysia) who's been doing videos about the goods & travel boycott for about a year now. He also has developed quite a loathing for several American politicians, including Hoekstra and the governor of Maine.

Here's his latest take on Hoekstra, who's whining about the alcohol not being on the shelves:

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

(if you haven't seen his videos before, he has a gorgeous female calico cat, aka "The Co-host", who sometimes offers her opinions as well)
 
Though if the leafs ever win the cup again there won't be anyone left to do riot or do anything in general.

everyone will have died of shock :)
Sixty more years!!!!

(Update to the chant I started at the Bell Centre in 2007 at a Habs/Leafs game—where I had a great view of Alex Kovalev taking out Darcy Tucker—and plan to reenact next year on its 20th anniversary). 😉
 
Though if the leafs ever win the cup again there won't be anyone left to do riot or do anything in general.

everyone will have died of shock :)

I'm not actually into sports myself, but I do have a couple relatives who are Leafs fans, so I will be sure to pass this along! :lol:
 
I'm not actually into sports myself, but I do have a couple relatives who are Leafs fans, so I will be sure to pass this along! :lol:

my sister-in-law, my wife's uncle is also a leaf's fan and has one son who followed in the blue & white, the other is a Candiennes fan.

though for a leafs fan, the sister-in-law has been been betting against them.
 
there are probley some alternate earths in the multiverse where many canadian teams won the stanley cups many times and different times between 1993 and 2025
 
I posted this GuardThe Leaf video in another area of the forum (where I suspect most of you here haven't opted in), so please don't take it as spamming. GtL is a guy from Vancouver, BC (currently lives and works in Malaysia) who's been doing videos about the goods & travel boycott for about a year now. He also has developed quite a loathing for several American politicians, including Hoekstra and the governor of Maine.

Guard the Leaf is a hero of mine. I like how he doesn't mince words and gets straight to the point most of the time.

About Hoekstra and others like him, I feel like they'll never understand precisely because they've never been put into a situation like ours. With lower population, we've constantly had to live with the effects of market and cultural influence from the United States. That's not something they've ever had to deal with, and maybe that's why it's difficult for them to process why threats to sovereignty hit the way they do. Because for most Canadians, watching the President in an official capacity shortly after being elected make annexation threats against us touched a nerve because he made it part of his language. It could be easily argued that it simply was not Presidential, to even joke about it. And then you have Hoekstra feigning ignorance and doubling down on the rhetoric and failing to do his job properly as an Ambassador, which in essence is like throwing new logs onto a fire rather than putting the fire out. I think a better Ambassador would be trying to figure out why we are upset and work towards building up back trust.
 
So many of them seem to think that because we didn't need a war to get our independence, it means we're not a real country and don't deserve to think of ourselves as one.

Here's Charlie Angus, addressing members of the Alberta Teachers' Association. Keep in mind that Danielle Smith has a pathological hatred of teachers, especially those in the public school system.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top