• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Superman

They have they're silly moments but the atmosphere just seemed more realistic. More real world.
Right, because all that obvious polystyrene looked exactly like real ice...
superman-fortress-of-solitude.jpg
 
They have they're silly moments but the atmosphere just seemed more realistic. More real world. Maybe it's because of the lack of cgi. Maybe because it was shot on film. Film grain tends to have a more palpable look. Also I like the Daily Planet set better. It seemed more like a newspaper office.

Sounds to me like a case of nostalgia playing a part in your opinion. Not that there’s anything wrong with that. Personally, I try to look at things on their own merit. I quite enjoyed Superman 2025. It felt like a comic book. Which is kind of what they were going for.
 
They have they're silly moments but the atmosphere just seemed more realistic. More real world. Maybe it's because of the lack of cgi. Maybe because it was shot on film. Film grain tends to have a more palpable look. Also I like the Daily Planet set better. It seemed more like a newspaper office.

They weren't "Realistic" at all, you're just saying that because they didn't have CGI or truly alien looking aliens.
 
I might allow that the Metropolis scenes have more textural “reality” in Donner’s film than in Gunn’s. They feel very much like a 1970s urban center, specifically New York, which is what they were (or at least a familiar movie version of same, with an atmosphere not dissimilar to many non-fantasy films of the period).

But again, realism isn’t what Gunn was going for, nor is it inherently a virtue.
 
It is. It's simplistic, outdated, and assumes that all the highfalutin' accountants employed by mega corporations are just on the payroll to make the offices look less empty.

Well it made a profit after it left theaters. A profit is a profit . It looks like it made a profit of about 100 to 125 mil. Not "Michael" numbers but it is a profit. Enough to fund half to a third of the second film.
 
Fact: Superman '25 proved popular and financially successful enough to get a sequel just two years later, and without putting him up against Batman, either.

Also fact: during the bidding war for WB, both Netflix and Paramount/Skydance explicitly and repeatedly pointed out that James Gunn and Peter Safran would stay on as heads of DC Studios, something they would not do if Superman '25 was not popular with audiences.
Thank goodness. I was really holding my breath on that because usually when a new regime comes in they like to clean house and start fresh.

Amazing that some are still arguing over this. IMO that debate is over. Superman 2025 was such a success that a Sequal is currently shooting right now as we speak . Game match, set point.

Mudd said:
It is. It's simplistic, outdated, and assumes that all the highfalutin' accountants employed by mega corporations are just on the payroll to make the offices look less empty.

Gee, a movie that came out 50 years ago now looks outdated. Who'd a thunk it ;)
 
Last edited:
Superman and Lois has great effects but also a much more toned down universe. Gunns superman i know is based off the 1950s and 60s superman comics that were in the more fantastical and silly route but the books tended to do it better. This new movie just seemed shallow. When youre watching real humans up there on the screen you want a bit more realism on the way they talk and act. You want the world to feel more real . Superman and Lois achieves what the movie really didnt. The Reeve movies achieved a more real word feel even with the added silliness.


Better than a thousand monkeys writing revenge social media posts against superman in another universe. Lol
Realism is the absolute last thing I want in this kind of a comic book movie, I want it to feel like a comic book, with all of the sci-fi/fantasy over the top craziness.
Yeah. I mean, S&L proved that a more “realistic” approach can work in the right creative hands, but there’s no reason it should be the default for live-action funnybook adaptations.

As for the relative realism of the Christopher Reeve films, it’s true they contained fewer overtly fanciful elements, pound for pound, than Gunn’s movie did. OTOH, Clark, Lois, and even Lex are all written and played somewhat closer to actual people in the DCU than in the Donnerverse, so that balances things out pretty nicely.
Yeah, I don't know if I'd call Superman & Lois realistic, it did feature the first live action appearance of Bizarro's cube earth.
 
Realism is the absolute last thing I want in this kind of a comic book movie, I want it to feel like a comic book, with all of the sci-fi/fantasy over the top craziness.

Yeah, I don't know if I'd call Superman & Lois realistic, it did feature the first live action appearance of Bizarro's cube earth.
Its treatment of Lois’ cancer storyline is among the most realistic portrayals I’ve seen (my wife went through breast cancer treatment the year before—I know what of I speak).

Besides “more realistic” is a relative term. His analysis is sound.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Time-travel is murder right?

Although the only reason to kill Zod is to make sure that he doesn't follow Kal-El back in time, since Superman could have time traveled at any point in the movie, removing Zod from Play, and announcing total victory.

If Zod, Ursa nd Non went back in time, following the son of Jor-El, there would have been 6 of them, although Zod would obviously betray himself while he is also betraying himself, and Clark would be out of Job.
 
In no world is the Donner Cut of Superman II worse then the theatrical. Seriously, Richard Lester was a complete hack and his version of Superman II is an unfunny farce. He was a comedy director who wasn't even very good at comedy put on a film that was never supposed to be a comedy. Superman IV is better then the Lester Cut of Superman II, and less of a joke.

Superman III, which is purely Lester's work, is somehow worse, and shows that without being able to use any of Donner's work Lester isn't even able to put out mediocrity. Not that having to use Richard Pryor as basically the main character of the film helped, I don't think Donner could have made Pryor work any better, but Lester just put out absolute trash.
 
In no world is the Donner Cut of Superman II worse then the theatrical. Seriously, Richard Lester was a complete hack and his version of Superman II is an unfunny farce. He was a comedy director who wasn't even very good at comedy put on a film that was never supposed to be a comedy. Superman IV is better then the Lester Cut of Superman II, and less of a joke.

Superman III, which is purely Lester's work, is somehow worse, and shows that without being able to use any of Donner's work Lester isn't even able to put out mediocrity. Not that having to use Richard Pryor as basically the main character of the film helped, I don't think Donner could have made Pryor work any better, but Lester just put out absolute trash.
Which of Lester's films have you seen?
 
Lester did some good, nay, great work.

A Hard Day's Night is the single greatest rock musical ever made, and Help! is a lot of campy fun with an engaging (if slapstick-level ridiculous) story. Lester has his weaknesses but "hack"? Please. The man crafted at least one of the best musicals of the postwar era.
 
Lester did some good, nay, great work.

A Hard Day's Night is the single greatest rock musical ever made, and Help! is a lot of campy fun with an engaging (if slapstick-level ridiculous) story. Lester has his weaknesses but "hack"? Please. The man crafted at least one of the best musicals of the postwar era.
And a very entertaining version of the Musketeers.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top