• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

What are your controversial Star Trek opinions?

I can freely admit that I am one of the people you are describing. I was a huge fan of the show, I launched the wikia back in the day (when that was still a thing), but hearing about the plans for season two in the years since so soured me on the whole thing I haven't been able to go back to it because when I have I see the ways that was already being foreshadowed.
What were the plans for season two?
 
What were the plans for season two?
Here, I'll let Tim Minear describe the specific plot line that so turned me off:
[Inara] had this magic syringe. She would take this drug. And if she were, for instance, raped, the rapist would die a horrible death. The story was that she gets kidnapped by Reavers and when Mal finally got to the ship to save her from the Reavers, he gets on the Reaver ship and all the Reavers are dead. Which would suggest a kind of really bad assault. At the end of the episode, he comes in after she’s been horribly brutalized, and he comes in and he gets down on his knee, and he takes her hand. And he treats her like a lady. And that’s the kind of stuff that we wanted to do. It was very dark. And this was actually the first story that Joss pitched to me when he asked me to come work on the show. He said, ‘These are the kind of stories we’re going to do.’
Inara has to be gang raped by Reavers in order for Mal to stop disrespecting her and her profession.

I hate it.
 
(Side note: What was the solution to the ultimate colonialist arrogance of the Borg?)

That's not the point; TNG' humans (more than any other species) served as guide and perspective for the TV viewers. Their world-view and beliefs formed that chapter of the franchise, thus viewers were "treated" to the Enterprise-D crew (and by association, Starfleet / Federation) who (in one way or another) carried on the more-often-than-not historically evil hubris of not only absorbing flesh & resources, but doing so under the belief in a group/race/species deserving to rule/absorb due to said human hubris (IOW, colonialist arrogance), often embodied by (but not limited to) Picard.

You're writing a TV show in its second successful season. Finally getting some critical acclaim as well as the ratings. Things are settling in.

You do know this is the What Are Your Controversial Star Trek Opinions thread, right?

My point is that "Q Who" created the perfect, justifiable in-universe introduction to Starfleet/Federation's end, all eventually set into motion by the arrogance of that century's Starfleet representatives. It would have been bold for a ST series to end it all in that abrupt (sort of) manner, then Roddenberry move on to another ST idea (set nowhere near the 24th century), or another project at that time.
 
The entire Federation being wiped out because Picard's an arsehole seems like a bit much.

For a similar controversial opinion though, I do think Picard should have died in BoBW - mostly to make way for Riker as a much less self-assured and thus potentially more interesting captain, but it'd also satisfy the theme you're raising I suppose.
 
Other interesting places to end Star Trek:

The Corbomite Maneuver: Kirk's attempt to save Balok backfires, destroying the ship and proving the error of his arrogant compassion.

Mirror, Mirror: Goatee Spock is able to convince Kirk that the Federation way of life is doomed to fail, and he obliterates the Halkans. The show ends with with the crew ready to start an new empire.

The Measure of a Man: Guinan's speech to Picard makes him realise that they would duplicate Data to make a slave race... and the Federation needs slaves to improve the quality of life for all organic beings. The series ends with the ship crewed with expendable Datas going off on a dangeous mission.

Caretaker: Janeway just goes home.

Broken Bow: They just kill the Klingon. Vulcans are right, humans are savages. The end.
 
For a similar controversial opinion though, I do think Picard should have died in BoBW - mostly to make way for Riker as a much less self-assured and thus potentially more interesting captain, but it'd also satisfy the theme you're raising I suppose.

Stewart was a much better leading man than Frakes ever could have been. Commercial viability overrules all.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top