• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Bank of England Warned to Prepare for Aliens

Then we move further out. When Sol goes Red Giant half a billion years from now and turns Earth into a orbiting charcoal briquet, the Galilean moons and Titan should be far enough away.
The red giant phase won't happen for another five billion years, so plenty of time to implement stellar lifting to put that date off, move the Earth, build megastructures and Dyson swarms etc. We've only been a technological civilisation for an eye-blink, cosmically speaking.
 
Last edited:
What about all these planets they keep finding that are described as "earth like" is there some set criteria for such a description?

Whenever I hear that my eyes roll and I keep wondering do they mean lush, thriving world with plants and native fauna or is it just a nice planet that's now a dead world but full of plant life?
I’m pretty sure they generally just mean it’s round.
 
Wikipedia calls it star lifting.
Both names refer to the same thing depending on which literature you consult. I prefer "stellar" as it's an adjective rather than a noun. "Lifting" is a gerund and so functions as a noun. Kind of a silly thing to worry about given it's well beyond our technological level.
 
The red giant phase won't happen for another five billion years, so plenty of time to implement stellar lifting to put that date off, move the Earth, build megastructures and Dyson swarms etc. We've only been a technological civilisation for an eye-blink, cosmically speaking.
Oops, meant to type "four and a" before 'half' there. Mea Quapla' (strikes chest three times)
 
I'm just disappointed I won't see the merging of our Galaxy and Andromeda. Imagine a big-assed spiral Galaxy (Andromeda is bigger than our Galaxy) filling up the sky and looming closer every year.

I'm not sure it'd be very bright - despite what is shown in sci-fi. Galaxies don't appear that bright even when you're in them. The Milky Way only averages magnitude 5 across the night sky and is easily washed out by light pollution. The collision of gas clouds will trigger increased star formation, so there will be more type 2 supernovae certainly. The probability of the two galaxies colliding is now put at evens (50%) last I read.

 
Live forever? I rewatched Groundhog Day last Monday. Seemed like Bill Murray was in a special kind of Hell. The quantum immortality hypothesis would have us believe all consciousnesses experience it.
 
Just got to be creative.

Never really understood why his character was fascinated by Andie MacDowell's. Boredom, perhaps? How it got him out of the perception of the loop, I never really understood. That he had to become a "better man" seemed annoyingly judgmental of the universe just to single him out. Perhaps she was a Q and dumped him straight afterwards for a lark.
 
Never really understood why his character was fascinated by Andie MacDowell's. Boredom, perhaps? How it got him out of the perception of the loop, I never really understood. That he had to become a "better man" seemed annoyingly judgmental of the universe just to single him out. Perhaps she was a Q and dumped him straight afterwards for a lark.

Eh, I guess everyone is different I love Andie Macdowell in that time period, she was a classical beauty, and still is really
 
Eh, I guess everyone is different I love Andie Macdowell in that time period, she was a classical beauty, and still is really
I was speaking to what was portrayed onscreen in the story and not some predeliction that a random audience member might have for a real-life actor.

Why was the character played by Murray apparently selected for prolonged torture so that he spent years altering himself to end up with a woman he barely knew originally?

If you think some standard of perceived beauty sanctions such a horrific act, perhaps question that. If the actor playing her character had been plain or ugly in your eyes, how would you have felt? (Rhetorical question)

It's a good job that the story is merely fiction and we don't experience the multiverse (if one exists) that way.
 
I was speaking to what was portrayed onscreen in the story and not some predeliction that a random audience member might have for a real-life actor.

Why was the character played by Murray apparently selected for prolonged torture so that he spent years altering himself to end up with a woman he barely knew originally?


We don't know. You'd have to ask the writers why it had to be him and her. It was a hellish torture but maybe that was the universe trying to make him a better person, via comedic hellish torture. The movie at its heart was a comedy and the time loop was secondary.
 
We don't know. You'd have to ask the writers why it had to be him and her. It was a hellish torture but maybe that was the universe trying to make him a better person, via comedic hellish torture. The movie at its heart was a comedy and the time loop was secondary.
It's a comedy whose premise doesn't bear close scrutiny or it becomes an existential horror flick.

Why would the universe care that some random dude is a douchebag who needs to end up in a relationship with a particular character? In some branches of a multiverse, a version of him does, but making him experience all the branches to be able to ratchet his way to a very arbitrary goal by exploiting memory seems like the behaviour of a cruel godlike entity, similar to the Ancient Greek ones.

Isn't this sort of behavioural reprogramming the sort of thing the Chinese Communist Party used to do?
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top