‘Star Trek: Section 31’ Nominated For Make-Up Award
Glenn Hetrick picks up his third nomination for Star Trek.
trekmovie.com
Spoilers Section 31 General Discussion Thread
- Thread starter F. King Daniel
- Start date
trekmovie.com
Awesome.‘Star Trek: Section 31’ Nominated For Make-Up Award
Glenn Hetrick picks up his third nomination for Star Trek.
‘Star Trek: Section 31’ Nominated For 5 Razzie Awards
The streaming movie also picked up another guild award nomination.
trekmovie.com
I’d say all of these make sense, but Kacey Rohl as “Worst Supporting Actress” is IMHO uncalled for. I think she was more than fine.
The article also goes on to say …
I dunno... The second one doesn't seem fair to Rohl. I thought her Rachel Garrett character was one of the best things about S31 and was kind of hoping we'd get a "Lost Era" show as she makes her way to the E-C. Oh well...
D
Deleted member 104212
Guest
I agree. Kacey Rohl did a fine job - although I just can't see her as Rachel Garrett. Replace that name with Lt. Mitchell, and it would have been the exact same character.
"$4.97 gold spray-painted Worst Picture Statuette"
"$4.97 gold spray-painted Worst Picture Statuette"
Well, that is the Razzies summed up in a single word.
Kacey Rohl was easily the best thing in that movie, so I definitely don't agree with her nomination.
Otherwise, meh. Though I think Section 31 will be spared actually getting a Razzie, given in most categories it's up against the 2025 adaptation of War of the Worlds. Easily a much worse film.
Otherwise, meh. Though I think Section 31 will be spared actually getting a Razzie, given in most categories it's up against the 2025 adaptation of War of the Worlds. Easily a much worse film.
Last edited:
I’m curious, did anyone here get any of the home media releases of the film? I consider it a trainwreck of a movie, but still I’ve been thinking about getting the blu-ray, both out of a sense of completeness but also because moderating this forum is a fun memory that I’d like to commemorate that way. 
I’ve been able to find out precious little about the various bonus features listed on the back of the blu-ray. So I’m wondering what people who own it have to say about the features. Anything interesting on there?
I’ve been able to find out precious little about the various bonus features listed on the back of the blu-ray. So I’m wondering what people who own it have to say about the features. Anything interesting on there?
I do have the Blu-ray, though I don't think I've watched any of the bonus features.
Is it fair to Yeoh and the director either?
They all had to work with the screenplay given to them.
Perhaps not, but someone should be held responsible for that dumpster fire. Its existence hasn't helped Kurtzman-era Trek in the eyes of the fandom and it certainly didn't present a break-out moment to garner new fans. So what good did it do for anyone?
Yeoh and the director thought it was the best thing ever, and probably still do.
I wouldn't shed too many tears for their feelings.
I'm almost ashamed to admit it, but yes. I'm too far in now to have a gap in the Trek collection.
Not for me, not really. There's probably a little bit here and there for some people, but I found there to be way too much of the typical glazing crap that most special features are these days. Not enough 'show how stuff was made/done' and too much 'talk about how great everything and everyone is'.
To be fair, I'm probably being way too mean about them due to the whole project being a clusterfudge. If there's anything specific you wanted to know about the extras I can try and answer with more neutrality.
Nothing to be ashamed of. I know how it is as a collector.I'm almost ashamed to admit it, but yes. I'm too far in now to have a gap in the Trek collection.
Not for me, not really. There's probably a little bit here and there for some people, but I found there to be way too much of the typical glazing crap that most special features are these days. Not enough 'show how stuff was made/done' and too much 'talk about how great everything and everyone is'.
To be fair, I'm probably being way too mean about them due to the whole project being a clusterfudge. If there's anything specific you wanted to know about the extras I can try and answer with more neutrality.
Thanks for the assessment of the extras. Unfortunately sounds like what I would have expected. Very rarely do these kind of bonus festures feel like just being there during the production anymore, being able to get some insights into the creative process. Would have been nice to learn some more about the series version that never was and how much of it went into the script for the movie (and how much didn‘t). And as a designer I‘m always interested in seeing some production sketches of ships, sets, props and costumes. I think the bridge set for their ship looked genuinely interesting, so it would be cool to see more of it under more natural lighting conditions.
Last edited:
Garrett's Starfleet phaser was the only redeeming quality about this whole production. Praise to P. Kirby for doing his homework in basing it on the TMP phaser used in "Yesterday's Enterprise" while also harking back to the TNG S1 dustbuster phaser.
Georgoiu's little Derringer phaser is kinda cool, too.
Georgoiu's little Derringer phaser is kinda cool, too.
Last edited:
Amazon gave me a coupon for the 4K release so like a fool, I gave in to the completionist in me and bought it today. Looks like you already got answers though.I’m curious, did anyone here get any of the home media releases of the film? I consider it a trainwreck of a movie, but still I’ve been thinking about getting the blu-ray, both out of a sense of completeness but also because moderating this forum is a fun memory that I’d like to commemorate that way.
I’ve been able to find out precious little about the various bonus features listed on the back of the blu-ray. So I’m wondering what people who own it have to say about the features. Anything interesting on there?
