These arguments are definitely not being made in good faith. Hell, at this point, it's just for argument's sake. Really not worth bothering over.
Spot on
These arguments are definitely not being made in good faith. Hell, at this point, it's just for argument's sake. Really not worth bothering over.
It’s why old Trek, with its fairly stilted, classical dialogue and use of culture that has already stood the test of time as set dressing, is going to fare better than modern Trek.
During the Berman years, a lot of Star Trek fans argued that TOS was unnecessary because it was dated, campy, artificial, etc. They didn't see it as timeless. Not everyone is going to see Berman Trek as timeless, either.
Oh, I remember those arguments. Some of them in this very forum...During the Berman years, a lot of Star Trek fans argued that TOS was unnecessary because it was dated, campy, artificial, etc. They didn't see it as timeless. Not everyone is going to see Berman Trek as timeless, either.
for some reason it didn't bother me, I may have been distracted by something.(Perpugilliam Browns American accent may also be an example of something they just about got away with once upon a time, but barely gets by now perhaps.)
for some reason it didn't bother me, I may have been distracted by something.
The civilian costumes in the early episodes of TNG definitely have not aged well.During the Berman years, a lot of Star Trek fans argued that TOS was unnecessary because it was dated, campy, artificial, etc. They didn't see it as timeless. Not everyone is going to see Berman Trek as timeless, either.
There's nothing more timeless than someone in 2382 looking back at what they and their friends were wearing in 2364 and cringing.The civilian costumes in the early episodes of TNG definitely have not aged well.
The civilian costumes in the early episodes of TNG definitely have not aged well.
Not to mention the revelation that the eighth Doctor will have three different futures.We had it in the books for *years* and it did something with the absence of Gallifrey too.
I shall always remember Imperiatrix Romana and the fall of the Nine Gallifreys, and the way the Doctor had to lose a heart and tether himself to Earth at his wedding to function in a universe with no Gallifrey that had ever been.
Batman '89 is an example I think of this. At the time everyone was going on as to how dark and serious it was compared with Batman '66. But with the passage of time and the release of the Nolan trilogy et al, its just as campy in it own way. By the way I still prefer it to the Matt Reeves Batman .During the Berman years, a lot of Star Trek fans argued that TOS was unnecessary because it was dated, campy, artificial, etc. They didn't see it as timeless. Not everyone is going to see Berman Trek as timeless, either.
I wonder how many non-Brits got the Barbara Woodhouse reference at the time? There's this song that the gang from Swap Shop sang in 1980/81 and I have to wonder how many people British or otherwise would get the references to. In fact I challenge particularly non-British visitors to this thread to know who many of these people are or were.Like Roger Moore telling a Tiger to sit.
Batman '89 is an example I think of this. At the time everyone was going on as to how dark and serious it was compared with Batman '66. But with the passage of time and the release of the Nolan trilogy et al, its just as campy in it own way. By the way I still prefer it to the Matt Reeves Batman .
I wonder how many non-Brits got the Barbara Woodhouse reference at the time? There's this song that the gang from Swap Shop sang in 1980/81 and I have to wonder how many people British or otherwise would get the references to. In fact I challenge particularly non-British visitors to this thread to know who many of these people are or were.
So, bad takes are your thing I suppose? There's nothing campy about B89, or in fact BR either. They're still comfortably dark takes, especially the latter, that only improved with age.Batman '89 is an example I think of this. At the time everyone was going on as to how dark and serious it was compared with Batman '66. But with the passage of time and the release of the Nolan trilogy et al, its just as campy in it own way. By the way I still prefer it to the Matt Reeves Batman .
So, bad takes are your thing I suppose? There's nothing campy about B89, or in fact BR either. They're still comfortably dark takes, especially the latter, that only improved with age.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.