• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Hey, I never noticed that before....

I think it's something about the makeup, the bangs, and harsh lighting on the face. Susan Oliver could look incredibly beautiful, but "The Cage" has scenes where they didn't do her justice. The Transporter room shot you cited isn't doing Majel Barrett any favors, either.

Susan appeared in an episode of Cannon the other morning on MeTV, and you're right about makeup and lighting.
She was only 41 at the time, but in some shots she looked older than that.
 
Elaan of Troyius…So that’s how the bridge is illuminated. In the top right hand corner you can see the bottom edge of a small flood light that is used for filming the scene.

elaan-of-troyius-br-190.jpg


***Trek Core supplied images***
 
The Way To Eden…something that’s always bothered me : several scenes on the planet surface seem rushed. There are shots of Kirk in reverse image and dubbed voices. It’s almost like the episode’s director called in sick or he just lost interest.

You’re looking the wrong way, Jim.

way-to-eden-br-684.jpg


***Trek Core supplied image***
 
I'm assuming the flop was deemed necessary for the eyeline. If so, and I had been on the remastering team, I would have been begging somebody to at least let me digitally correct the division insignia to be on the other side (not that it would have been fast or easy, of course). Shatner's backwards hairline is a minor irritation, but that command patch makes this very jarring.

If it was too many frames for correction to be feasible, then another option could have been painting it out (as if the patch had been missing). Wouldn't be the only time a patch or braid was missing.
 
Elaan of Troyius…So that’s how the bridge is illuminated. In the top right hand corner you can see the bottom edge of a small flood light that is used for filming the scene.

elaan-of-troyius-br-190.jpg


***Trek Core supplied images***

"Our [floodlit] ghost has materialized." "Elaan" has some terrific bridge scenes and action, elevating it above some of the lesser aspects of the story. Plus, Spock actually acts and is written like Spock.

I'm assuming the flop was deemed necessary for the eyeline. If so, and I had been on the remastering team, I would have been begging somebody to at least let me digitally correct the division insignia to be on the other side (not that it would have been fast or easy, of course). Shatner's backwards hairline is a minor irritation, but that command patch makes this very jarring.

If it was too many frames for correction to be feasible, then another option could have been painting it out (as if the patch had been missing). Wouldn't be the only time a patch or braid was missing.

It's a shame because that's a solid landing party scene that, again, is a fun aspect of an otherwise maligned S3 entry.
 
The Way To Eden…something that’s always bothered me : several scenes on the planet surface seem rushed. There are shots of Kirk in reverse image and dubbed voices. It’s almost like the episode’s director called in sick or he just lost interest.

You’re looking the wrong way, Jim.

way-to-eden-br-684.jpg


***Trek Core supplied image***
Yes, it's because they needed Kirk to look screen right to have an eyeline to Severin, and they must not have had a suitable shot, so they flopped the shot in post. Several shots got flopped in the teaser of "The Enemy Within" to fix directional continuity problems.
 
Yes, it's because they needed Kirk to look screen right to have an eyeline to Severin, and they must not have had a suitable shot, so they flopped the shot in post. Several shots got flopped in the teaser of "The Enemy Within" to fix directional continuity problems.

I'm trying to remember but I'd swear they did the old fliparoo in a few other stories as well, if needed. Do correct me where I'm wrong, but as filming was more expensive back then, took longer to set up, in stages that got very hot with all the lighting needed, and, unlike with today's technology, you had to develop the film to see if it was overexposed or underexposed or other problems requiring a reshoot (assuming no problems occurred while developing it, such as a first-year graduate walking into the room and turning on the main light switch, oops...), it made sense to do those little post-production cheap tricks to get stuff done and out the door.

It's easy to see why TOS flipped negs around, had stock shots of navigator and helm crew looking back at Kirk (even when there was never a new shot made featuring both Chekov and Sulu simultaneously!), etc, even if it stands out - especially by the 80s, never mind today.
 
I don't think it was about being cheap or the rigors of production inasmuch as it was that oversights inevitably happen when shooting or a decision is made during editing that a shot is needed that they don't have footage for, and you take what you have and make it work.

Having worked film shoots, I've seen this happen. You're busy getting the shots and you don't think the coverage through. Or, while in post-production, you decide to move things around, but you don't have all the footage you'd want to make it work.

I worked on one shoot where an actor asked if they could change their eyeline. The camera operator said yes, and then the result was that the new eyeline "crossed the line" because they forgot to consider where all the other eyelines were in the other shots in the scene.
 
Last edited:

There's some neat info about Susan's life in that article
So that guy wrote a long biographical sketch of Susan Oliver and never mentioned Star Trek? That's like writing up Sir Isaac Newton and not mentioning physics. It's the biggest thing she did!
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top