That's what I thought.
Spoilers First Reviews
- Thread starter Tuskin38
- Start date
I think so, yes. But it’s still pretty red under regular conditions. Elements like the floor are definitely red and not only lit by red light.
I've never understood the logic with the decks having to be so shiny.
Makes me think of this ...
Tanning mode
It looks like a 60s diner.
It does a bit, doesn’t it? Well, I guess if a bridge can look like a carpeted 80s beige hotel lobby with wooden paneling it can also look like a 60s diner.
Will be interesting to learn if something like that was on the moodboard when this was designed.
Toxic fandom was in force all the way back then as well, and this was described as being, "The Love Boat in space." Having a bald Captain just fueled those kinds of comments. "This will just be The Love Boat in space. Star Trek is ruined."It does a bit, doesn’t it? Well, I guess if a bridge can look like a carpeted 80s beige hotel lobby with wooden paneling it can also look like a 60s diner.
Followed a few years later by...
"You can't do Star Trek on a space station! Star Trek is ruined."
Lather. Rinse. Repeat.
The only thing that ever changes is the title of the show.
Last edited:
All true. I think there’s a lot of truth in what Tawny Newsome said on the Blue Carpet (paraphrasing): “The fans will dissect everything they hate about it, it is a Star Trek rite of passage.”
And that is an absolute tragedy.All true. I think there’s a lot of truth in what Tawny Newsome said on the Blue Carpet (paraphrasing): “The fans will dissect everything they hate about it, it is a Star Trek rite of passage.”
No, I'm not being hyperbolic. The older I get the more I realize that Star Trek had short changed people's ability to grow. The claim that it is philosophical and foundational is lost because people don't apply it in real life. "Star Trek use to mean something!"
What do you mean that it used to? You stopped applying the lessons of learning about diversity because of a TV show changing formats? What does that say about the lessons supposedly learned?
Star Trek fandom as a whole has a dour experience to it and it's very sad.
Well, from a production standpoint there's at least good reason to use carpet.It does a bit, doesn’t it? Well, I guess if a bridge can look like a carpeted 80s beige hotel lobby with wooden paneling it can also look like a 60s diner.
Will be interesting to learn if something like that was on the moodboard when this was designed.
It dampens sound, prevents reflections, makes things slightly easier on the actors, and has a minimal level of upkeep compared to shiny floors.
The real question is why they moved away from it, because that's gotta be costing them a lot in post production work to remove footsteps, shoe squeaks, and unwanted reflections.
If they were going for the Las Vegas Casino look, they nailed it.
Well it was either that or making it look like an apple store. or a hotel lobby
The bridge looks otherworldly. It's good enough as a vehicle for adventure, which is all it needs to be.
They only one because the mainstream audience didn't show up.
