What is your opinion of season 3 as a whole?

[fireproof78]

I don't watch stuff that annoys and angers me. Too much stress, too much to run and complain about.

Maybe that's just me. I'm a radically unconventional fellow.

Life is stressful enough. If I get to watch things for entertainment, and that's limited, it will be things I enjoy.

 

[Nerys Myk]

Because she is the young one! She's originally a cadet deciding what she wants to do with her life, and over the series she's been growing into a more confident person. She's had quite a bit of focus on that growth.

It's like they don't even watch the show.

 

[gabby1701]

Because she is the young one! She's originally a cadet deciding what she wants to do with her life, and over the series she's been growing into a more confident person. She's had quite a bit of focus on that growth.

Like Laan it could have been a new character doing this. Uhura was not needed as with Kirk or Sam. if uhura is the young one as you say, then why are chapel spock and kirk not the young ones? why her and i am sorry the most iconic of the females from tos.

Zero inconsistency. Kelvin trek at least got this right. like TOS it cast all the actors around the same age. Uhura been significantly much younger than the rest of the group or the young one should not have been the case and I do think changes a lot of the dynamic.

SNW wanted their young innocence character POV like most star trek does with Sato Crusher and adira. but they should not have used an established character like uhura for that. Just create a new character same with khan-laan.

chapel I would even pick to be the young one because in the original show she could be shy, lacked confidence and sometimes felt out of place away from the core 7.
Also when you take into account in tos uhura always came off more confident with a bigger personality. It may have made more sense to make chapel the young one and may be easier to explain her crush on spock in tos. a young girl who had this crush on a older guy that did not return her feelings. they could have played the spock/chapel thing like that than the mess we got in snw that we know does not fit tos timeline.

can you imagine rebooting Friends and making rachel green a much significantly younger character than the rest of the group chandler, joey and the rest? this to me is the equivalent of how they handled uhura on the show. while I do not think this is like the worst thing ever but it could have been better. as with quinto spock, saldana uhura was much closer to tos uhura.

 

[V'Lias]

It's like they don't even watch the show.

I've come to believe that's the answer.

 

[Nerys Myk]

Like Laan it could have been a new character doing this. Uhura was not needed as with Kirk or Sam. if uhura is the young one as you say, then why are chapel spock and kirk not the young ones? why her and i am sorry the most iconic of the females from tos.

Zero inconsistency. Kelvin trek at least got this right. like TOS it cast all the actors around the same age. Uhura been significantly much younger than the rest of the group or the young one should not have been the case and I do think changes a lot of the dynamic.

SNW wanted their young innocence character POV like most star trek does with Sato Crusher and adira. but they should not have used an established character like uhura for that. Just create a new character same with khan-laan.

chapel I would even pick to be the young one because in the original show she could be shy, lacked confidence and sometimes felt out of place away from the core 7.
Also when you take into account in tos uhura always came off more confident with a bigger personality. It may have made more sense to make chapel the young one and may be easier to explain her crush on spock in tos. a young girl who had this crush on a older guy that did not return her feelings. they could have played the spock/chapel thing like that than the mess we got in snw that we know does not fit tos timeline.

can you imagine rebooting Friends and making rachel green a much significantly younger character than the rest of the group chandler, joey and the rest? this to me is the equivalent of how they handled uhura on the show. while I do not think this is like the worst thing ever but it could have been better. as with quinto spock, saldana uhura was much closer to tos uhura.

 

[fireproof78]

Like Laan it could have been a new character doing this. Uhura was not needed as with Kirk or Sam. if uhura is the young one as you say, then why are chapel spock and kirk not the young ones? why her and i am sorry the most iconic of the females from tos.

Zero inconsistency. Kelvin trek at least got this right. like TOS it cast all the actors around the same age. Uhura been significantly much younger than the rest of the group or the young one should not have been the case and I do think changes a lot of the dynamic.

SNW wanted their young innocence character POV like most star trek does with Sato Crusher and adira. but they should not have used an established character like uhura for that. Just create a new character same with khan-laan.

chapel I would even pick to be the young one because in the original show she could be shy, lacked confidence and sometimes felt out of place away from the core 7.
Also when you take into account in tos uhura always came off more confident with a bigger personality. It may have made more sense to make chapel the young one and may be easier to explain her crush on spock in tos. a young girl who had this crush on a older guy that did not return her feelings. they could have played the spock/chapel thing like that than the mess we got in snw that we know does not fit tos timeline.

can you imagine rebooting Friends and making rachel green a much significantly younger character than the rest of the group chandler, joey and the rest? this to me is the equivalent of how they handled uhura on the show. while I do not think this is like the worst thing ever but it could have been better. as with quinto spock, saldana uhura was much closer to tos uhura.

Uhura s story has been a high point of SNW. Her age is unestablished in TOS so any issues with that is made up whole cloth.

 

[Firebird]

 

[Warp Core Breach]

More like flat out broken.

 

[cooleddie74]

#MyArgumentImplodesWithDelight

 

[The Wormhole]

like jake and scully rom the x files

Jake from X-Files?

 

[cooleddie74]

Jake. From Deep State Farm.

 

[TRON JA307020]

Like Laan it could have been a new character doing this. Uhura was not needed as with Kirk or Sam. if uhura is the young one as you say, then why are chapel spock and kirk not the young ones? why her and i am sorry the most iconic of the females from tos.

Zero inconsistency. Kelvin trek at least got this right. like TOS it cast all the actors around the same age. Uhura been significantly much younger than the rest of the group or the young one should not have been the case and I do think changes a lot of the dynamic.

SNW wanted their young innocence character POV like most star trek does with Sato Crusher and adira. but they should not have used an established character like uhura for that. Just create a new character same with khan-laan.

chapel I would even pick to be the young one because in the original show she could be shy, lacked confidence and sometimes felt out of place away from the core 7.
Also when you take into account in tos uhura always came off more confident with a bigger personality. It may have made more sense to make chapel the young one and may be easier to explain her crush on spock in tos. a young girl who had this crush on a older guy that did not return her feelings. they could have played the spock/chapel thing like that than the mess we got in snw that we know does not fit tos timeline.

can you imagine rebooting Friends and making rachel green a much significantly younger character than the rest of the group chandler, joey and the rest? this to me is the equivalent of how they handled uhura on the show. while I do not think this is like the worst thing ever but it could have been better. as with quinto spock, saldana uhura was much closer to tos uhura.

Also they cast an actor much older than Shatner was when he played Kirk. He looks older and isnt nearly as dynamic. Poor casting.

 

[Sketcher]

Also they cast an actor much older than Shatner was when he played Kirk. He looks older and isnt nearly as dynamic. Poor casting.

Shatner was poor casting to begin with. Each Kirk actor since has been an improvement.

 

[Laura Cynthia Chambers]

A controversial opinion I've never heard before.

 

[cooleddie74]

I like all three for their strengths. Shatner's easily my favorite, but Wesley and Pine are no slouches.

 

[TRON JA307020]

Shatner was poor casting to begin with. Each Kirk actor since has been an improvement.

Shatner was perfect casting. No one has come close to his performance.

 

[fireproof78]

I like all three for their strengths. Shatner's easily my favorite, but Wesley and Pine are no slouches.

I have not seen a bad Kirk.

 

[Firebird]

I like all three for their strengths. Shatner's easily my favorite, but Wesley and Pine are no slouches.

Sandra Smith also did a very credible embodiment of Kirk, too.

 

[cooleddie74]

And she was literally TOS Kirk, just in a woman's body.

Insert jokes here.

 

[Nerys Myk]

Sandra Smith also did a very credible embodiment of Kirk, too.

Shatner as Lester, no so much.