There's no report of him leaving but I am curious how long he will stay/is contracted for.
i doubt that he will leave again this time
well at least not yet maybe in 5 or 6 years
Last edited:
There's no report of him leaving but I am curious how long he will stay/is contracted for.
See, that's precisely why it bothers me. I hate that crap in the comics.
But good to read that Marvel is (finally) including the legacy issue number.
Nothing seems to be "stat" with Doctor Who at this point.Most of RTD 2.0 has been a disaster.
Can we get another showrunner stat?

Nah, only the finales.Most of RTD 2.0 has been a disaster.
I'm well aware. Doesn't make me hate it any less.Marvel has been doing that off and on for 20 years.
Yeah, the Disney renumbering was weird since they literally just picked right up where the last season left off. It would have at least made sense if they treated as more of a soft reboot.Honestly, I've made my peace with not continuing the number from the classic show. It works because the season/series structures are vastly different, the major gap between classic and modern, and the very usage of season and series.
But the Disney season number reset was done purely for marketing reasons and I'm eager to forget that ever happened.
I have to admit, that's how tend to think of the seasons most of the time. Instead of "oh this episode was the second episode of Series 5", I tend to think "oh this episode was the second episode of Matt Smith's first season".I would prefer a renumbering to Number of the Doctor and a Season number.
3:1 for Pertwee's first season and so on.
That's what I've been saying!Indeed, finales aside, RTD's second term has been some great television.
Oh, I see that now. I think I did know that but I haven't been a regular reader since the 90s.I think he might have meant to legacy numbering, it's not something new, they been doing it for a while now. I think they used to put it on the title page somewhere, but now they've moved it out onto the cover.
Whether one likes his writing or not, if he leaves, what I fear is that the BBC will either not try or not be able to get a replacement and the show will thus be binned by default.I'm probably not gonna be the majority...but I wish RTD stays.
I do not recall such an episode. Surely it has been scrubbed from existence by now?That's what I've been saying!
ps: okay, maybe Space Babies also wasn't particularly good, but beyond that, not a bad record.
He's not sticking around forever. And Moffat is not going to come back to the job full time. It's time to find a talented showrunner who can take over when RTD steps downWhether one likes his writing or not, if he leaves, what I fear is that the BBC will either not try or not be able to get a replacement and the show will thus be binned by default.
I don’t disagree but if memory serves, the BBC nearly rested the show after he and Tennant announced their departure first time and had no successor lined up for Chibnall, until RTD unexpectedly volunteered to return. It could all of course be different behind the scenes now. I don’t know.He's not sticking around forever. And Moffat is not going to come back to the job full time. It's time to find a talented showrunner who can take over when RTD steps down
If he's writing Christmas 2026 now, they have a year and a half to hire a new showrunner for Spring 2027.I don’t disagree but if memory serves, the BBC nearly rested the show after he and Tennant announced their departure first time and had no successor lined up for Chibnall, until RTD unexpectedly volunteered to return. It could all of course be different behind the scenes now. I don’t know.
Probably like £600,000 lolSo this might be a bad scale/ example but how much did it cost to make an episode like season 1’s “World War 3”?
If we have to go back to the nuts and bolts of new era Doctor Who relying strictly on BBC and Cardiff to churn out an episode Im fine with that
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.