• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

I'm with Rich Evans. ST:TMP is the best Star Trek movie. Here's my brief review.

xenobuzz

Cadet
Newbie
I first have to preface my review with a little background on the time, as I remember seeing this film in theaters.

I had always had a soft spot for The Motion Picture, flawed as it was upon release. Then the Director's Cut came out on DVD in 2001 and I loved how it restored so much footage that enhanced the character and story arcs as well as giving us a better look at the V'Ger vessel.

Then I saw the second restoration of the Director's cut on Blu-Ray and that was it. It is truly phenomenal. Not only did they discover a wealth of audio files for the dialogue to make a much better surround mix, they also found all the effects plates for so many of the shots and sequences in the film, and as such were able to recompose these various plates into a final shot with any resolution loss from the older method of composition.

The film can be difficult for those who are used to the more action-oriented version of Star Trek with all the pew pew and punch punch, but it's really important to remember when this film came out, and that the franchise didn't even really exist in 1979. The show had been cancelled about a decade ago, and so when they finally settled on the idea of making a film, they had to figure how they were going to bring all the characters back together.

That the first act of the film is mostly devoted to reassembling the original crew likely seems odd to younger viewers because for them, Star Trek has always been here, but back in 1979 it was the opposite. Star Trek was basically on life support in syndication, and while the many conventions allowed fans to meet and share stories and memorabilia, Star Trek was not the pop culture juggernaut that it would soon become.

All of the sequels are wonderful in evoking that Horatio Hornblower swashbuckling ship-to-ship action, and I love them for it, but The Motion Picture is more thoughtful, philosophical, and filled with wonder and awe. It's a story of reunion, discovery, communication, and transformation. The search for knowledge, the search for self, and the search for one's places in the cosmos. Anyways, here's my review:

The emotional motion picture about life, the universe and everything.​

Star Trek’s first foray onto cinema screens mirrored many of the difficulties encountered in during the abortive run of the original TV show. The film project underwent several drastic changes and despite being a financial success upon its theatrical debut, Star Trek: The Motion Picture has long been lambasted as “The Motionless Picture” for its slow pacing, muted color palette and somewhat stilted acting. However, as the decades passed and more information was revealed about the frantic production, a lot of those criticisms bear less weight, especially upon viewing this second and even more complete restoration of director Robert Wise’s vision of the film.

The Director’s Cut was first completed and released on DVD in 2001, and for many fans, it was a revelation. The production schedule for The Motion Picture was so short that many sequences and special effects were never finished. Over 20 years later, a team of very talented and devoted special effects technicians worked directly with Robert Wise to complete many of the missing elements and produce a version of the film that Wise had always wanted. The additional scenes increase the scope of the story, further develop the characters, and finally reveal V’Ger in all its astounding glory.

One of the most impressive aspects of this new version was that the effects company understood that film grain would need to be digitally added to these new special effects so that they would blend in better with the filmed elements from the late Seventies, a pitfall rarely avoided in other cinematic revisitations and revisions! Despite the multitude of new effects, the film no longer looks like a patchwork of disparate parts and has instead become a fully integrated and seamless piece. It’s a truly gorgeous restoration and also a removal of an ancient thorn from Robert Wise’s side!

However, that 2001 version was produced for the DVD market, and so it did not have the HD resolution that would take full advantage of what Blu-Ray and 4K can bring to home viewing, nor did it have a proper sound mix. With the launch of the Paramount Plus streaming service, the studio decided to revisit the Director’s Cut and update it a second time to ensure that it would be its absolute best for home viewing as a visual piece of art and as a sound experience. Many of the visual effects from the 2001 edition have been further improved, and a new Dolby Atmos mix made the sound and music elements worthy of modern home theater systems.

That’s all well and good, but what about the movie? Does it still have a slow and plodding pace that’s about as exciting as watching paint dry? As always, that will depend on the viewer. For myself, I LOVED it. Star Trek: The Motion Picture is a mood and I am here for it! While the franchise has done very well overall with its more action-oriented sequels, this first film has become one of my top three Star Trek films because it’s the only one with a truly cosmic idea that just goes for it! It’s philosophical, introspective, and surreal in ways which few science fiction films have been able to achieve.

Not many are familiar with Robert Wise’s filmography, but he was the director of the original version of “The Day the Earth Stood Still”, another classic and iconic science fiction film that also takes its time to set the stage before the story gets going. However, that firm foundation is critical to its thematic success, and this methodical approach is replicated in Star Trek: The Motion Picture. The film does move slowly, but the attention to detail elevates the heady atmosphere while the complete commitment to the concept propels the movie toward a wondrous climax of transformation whose roots are deeply anchored within a timeless love story of soul mates reunited.

Despite having watched the film many times over the decades, it had never really clicked for me that the relationship between Decker and Ilia is the heart of the story. Although Ilia is a Deltan and sworn to celibacy, her history with Decker suggests a feeling between them far greater than mere sexual attraction. While we don’t get the details on how they bonded so deeply, the film does a superb job of establishing that their mutual connection is on a deeper level that thankfully reaches a triumphant and achingly romantic conclusion.

Various visual and stylistic elements of Stanley Kubrick’s “2001: A Space Odyssey” and Steven Spielberg’s “Close Encounters of the Third Kind” can be felt throughout, and they beautifully evoke the cosmic notions, philosophical ponderings, and eye-goggling scope of the universe, reminding us of what is possible beyond our limited vision. After waiting over 40 years, Star Trek: The Motion Picture is finally able to show us that the human adventure is just beginning, and there are always possibilities.

Possibilities in evolution, in artificial intelligence and in the human heart.
 
Rich Evans?
ikyK5Dy.gif

Red Letter Media
 
It's my favourite movie, when I was a teenager I had the special longer version on VHS tape which I watched nearly every day.
 
I first have to preface my review with a little background on the time, as I remember seeing this film in theaters.

I was too young to appreciate it at the time...

I had always had a soft spot for The Motion Picture, flawed as it was upon release.

Especially the context of the time. No new live action episodes, I don't recall the animated series being repeated anything as often... it would be a big deal back then.

Then the Director's Cut came out on DVD in 2001 and I loved how it restored so much footage that enhanced the character and story arcs as well as giving us a better look at the V'Ger vessel.

The better look at the V'Ger vessel is the best thing about it.

Sadly, too many scene cuts and, worse, sound effects changes, dampened it too much for my liking.

Then I saw the second restoration of the Director's cut on Blu-Ray and that was it. It is truly phenomenal. Not only did they discover a wealth of audio files for the dialogue to make a much better surround mix, they also found all the effects plates for so many of the shots and sequences in the film, and as such were able to recompose these various plates into a final shot with any resolution loss from the older method of composition.

Now this is where I really adore the 4K release: They lovingly dived into the Director's Cut, the longer (!) TV version, and made a platinum* standard that included every version and treated them equally.

* the "p" is silent...​


The film can be difficult for those who are used to the more action-oriented version of Star Trek with all the pew pew and punch punch, but it's really important to remember when this film came out, and that the franchise didn't even really exist in 1979. The show had been cancelled about a decade ago, and so when they finally settled on the idea of making a film, they had to figure how they were going to bring all the characters back together.

The build-up and tension, the suspense, as well as an unfamiliarity with the ship's redesign are in lieu of space battles, though how TWOK would do the pew-pew was eminently satisfying and original - or at least not done so often that it became tropey.

With the Paramount network being the original impetus for a Trek revival, then that being sidelined in favor of the movie, they had to have had some idea or went back to the drawing board completely given that big screen flicks are simply not television worlds.

That the first act of the film is mostly devoted to reassembling the original crew likely seems odd to younger viewers because for them, Star Trek has always been here, but back in 1979 it was the opposite. Star Trek was basically on life support in syndication, and while the many conventions allowed fans to meet and share stories and memorabilia, Star Trek was not the pop culture juggernaut that it would soon become.

^^this

From a 1979 perspective, the movie was legitimately huge. For both fandom and from a technological standpoint as the modelwork was nothing less than sumptuous and scale-driven in a way that Star Wars was not. It felt, in a word, "tangible".

All of the sequels are wonderful in evoking that Horatio Hornblower swashbuckling ship-to-ship action, and I love them for it, but The Motion Picture is more thoughtful, philosophical, and filled with wonder and awe. It's a story of reunion, discovery, communication, and transformation. The search for knowledge, the search for self, and the search for one's places in the cosmos.

^^this

Trek always nudged toward some philosophical intrigue, even if wasn't always smooth and tactful about it (a few TOS episodes were anything but subtle, but that's definitely for the TOS forum to expand on..)

Anyways, here's my review:

The emotional motion picture about life, the universe and everything.​

Star Trek’s first foray onto cinema screens mirrored many of the difficulties encountered in during the abortive run of the original TV show. The film project underwent several drastic changes and despite being a financial success upon its theatrical debut, Star Trek: The Motion Picture has long been lambasted as “The Motionless Picture” for its slow pacing, muted color palette and somewhat stilted acting. However, as the decades passed and more information was revealed about the frantic production, a lot of those criticisms bear less weight, especially upon viewing this second and even more complete restoration of director Robert Wise’s vision of the film.

The muted palette - mostly desaturated earth tones - is easily the biggest shock compared to TOS. Or the handful of scenes where, whoops, the costuming was a little too tight and now we know why certain actors had had their tunics hanging down a few inches more...

Kirk did seem a little more stolid, but could be explained away by the last 18 months' worth of events combined with a big deadly thing heading toward Earth (sorry Dr McCoy)?

The pacing wasn't as much "slow" but more like "the feel of the moment", using real time more often than elapsed time. Did it work? Well, not always, but I do wonder if - if any of us were in a big space ship that was swallowed up by a far bigger one - we'd gawk and gape at the sheer size of it all:

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Over three minutes of absolutely gorgeous vfx that might have been more awe-inspiring to those in the audience high on drugs at the time*, no CGI used as such, and not once does Tom Baker's face appear. Not to mention, along with the Doctor Who opening credits' light show there, the space travelers there would be exposed to along with the space cancer... yay for deflector dishes!

* Just wait until the mid-90s screensavers were popularized, no need to annoy crowds while mentally inebriated. But high or not, the effects really are gorgeous. But require a bit of time to forget about before re-viewing as that's when it really does feel sloggy.​

The Director’s Cut was first completed and released on DVD in 2001, and for many fans, it was a revelation. The production schedule for The Motion Picture was so short that many sequences and special effects were never finished. Over 20 years later, a team of very talented and devoted special effects technicians worked directly with Robert Wise to complete many of the missing elements and produce a version of the film that Wise had always wanted. The additional scenes increase the scope of the story, further develop the characters, and finally reveal V’Ger in all its astounding glory.

One of the most impressive aspects of this new version was that the effects company understood that film grain would need to be digitally added to these new special effects so that they would blend in better with the filmed elements from the late Seventies, a pitfall rarely avoided in other cinematic revisitations and revisions! Despite the multitude of new effects, the film no longer looks like a patchwork of disparate parts and has instead become a fully integrated and seamless piece. It’s a truly gorgeous restoration and also a removal of an ancient thorn from Robert Wise’s side!

However, that 2001 version was produced for the DVD market, and so it did not have the HD resolution that would take full advantage of what Blu-Ray and 4K can bring to home viewing, nor did it have a proper sound mix. With the launch of the Paramount Plus streaming service, the studio decided to revisit the Director’s Cut and update it a second time to ensure that it would be its absolute best for home viewing as a visual piece of art and as a sound experience. Many of the visual effects from the 2001 edition have been further improved, and a new Dolby Atmos mix made the sound and music elements worthy of modern home theater systems.

That’s all well and good, but what about the movie? Does it still have a slow and plodding pace that’s about as exciting as watching paint dry? As always, that will depend on the viewer. For myself, I LOVED it. Star Trek: The Motion Picture is a mood and I am here for it! While the franchise has done very well overall with its more action-oriented sequels, this first film has become one of my top three Star Trek films because it’s the only one with a truly cosmic idea that just goes for it! It’s philosophical, introspective, and surreal in ways which few science fiction films have been able to achieve.

Not many are familiar with Robert Wise’s filmography, but he was the director of the original version of “The Day the Earth Stood Still”, another classic and iconic science fiction film that also takes its time to set the stage before the story gets going. However, that firm foundation is critical to its thematic success, and this methodical approach is replicated in Star Trek: The Motion Picture. The film does move slowly, but the attention to detail elevates the heady atmosphere while the complete commitment to the concept propels the movie toward a wondrous climax of transformation whose roots are deeply anchored within a timeless love story of soul mates reunited.

Despite having watched the film many times over the decades, it had never really clicked for me that the relationship between Decker and Ilia is the heart of the story. Although Ilia is a Deltan and sworn to celibacy, her history with Decker suggests a feeling between them far greater than mere sexual attraction. While we don’t get the details on how they bonded so deeply, the film does a superb job of establishing that their mutual connection is on a deeper level that thankfully reaches a triumphant and achingly romantic conclusion.

Various visual and stylistic elements of Stanley Kubrick’s “2001: A Space Odyssey” and Steven Spielberg’s “Close Encounters of the Third Kind” can be felt throughout, and they beautifully evoke the cosmic notions, philosophical ponderings, and eye-goggling scope of the universe, reminding us of what is possible beyond our limited vision. After waiting over 40 years, Star Trek: The Motion Picture is finally able to show us that the human adventure is just beginning, and there are always possibilities.

Possibilities in evolution, in artificial intelligence and in the human heart.

The movie's themes of finding Humanity as well as finding Vulcanity are well juxtaposed. Even the V'Ger amalgamated machine "life form" is wanting to find itself along with everyone else. And, no, the idea that the Borg were birthed here doesn't really make sense beyond the annals of fanwank. Maybe the Borg intercepted the V'Ger probe somehow, but thankfully the Voyager spinoff show didn't have the Borg Queen saying "That name sounds familiar, cool!" What did the V'Ger probe have that the Borg of ye olde would have found worthwhille enough to assimilate? Apart from the dimorphic differences, but that's the fun part - show me a mashup of this flick and "Planet of the Apes" where the Borg invade thousands of years in the future, checks their proverbial notes on what humans look like, and are instantly dumbfounded that they can barely speak, can't write, wear so little clothing they may as well be streakers as that was rendered popular by 1974 as well, ask David Niven about that bit...
 
The film can be difficult for those who are used to the more action-oriented version of Star Trek with all the pew pew and punch punch, but it's really important to remember when this film came out, and that the franchise didn't even really exist in 1979. The show had been cancelled about a decade ago, and so when they finally settled on the idea of making a film, they had to figure how they were going to bring all the characters back together.
Possibilities in evolution, in artificial intelligence and in the human heart.

I don't know. As a first-generation fan, who grew up watching TOS during its original run on NBC and later in syndication, I wasn't comparing it to later Trek shows and movies back in the 1979, since all of those had yet to exist. And I still thought TMP, for all its virtues, felt more like "2001" and "Close Encounters" than the show I devoured back in the sixties and seventies. (For the record, I was in college when TMP debuted.)

And let's be honest here. There was plenty of action and adventure back in the classic original series; heck, Captain Kirk got into a bare-knuckled fistfight every third episode and there was no shortage of colorful space-opera coolness: a lizard monster, a salt vampire, Apollo's giant green hand, and so on, along with the morality plays, topical allegories, and frequently thought-provoking SF notions.

Don't get me wrong. I'm not saying TOS was just fun and excitement, but let's not pretend that it was a purely "cerebral" enterprise that never, ever indulged in good, old-fashioned thrills, chills, full-blooded, emotion, conflict, and drama. The TOS I remember was brash and bold and, yes, even melodramatic at times. Not coolly philosophical

I respect TMP's ambition, but am no hurry to watch it again. Give me Khan or the whales instead.

(Let it noted, however, that I am a big fan of many of Robert Wise's other movies. Not just The Day The Earth Stood Still, but also The Andromeda Strain, The Haunting, The Body Snatcher (with Karloff and Lugosi), Curse of the Cat People, and, of course, West Side Story and The Sound of Music. Actually met Wise back in the day. Still have his autograph.)
 
Last edited:
The Director's Cut is so much better than the theatrical cut. Even the network TV cut is better than what made it into the theatres.

I'm not entirely sure, but I think I last saw TMP more recently than any other theatrical ST film. Probably because of a thread on TrekBBS that took the whole business of Ilia's Oath of Celibacy entirely the wrong way.
 
Whether or not the OP is in fact Rich Evans of RLM fame or some impostor... I couldn't care less.

All I know is TMP is a massively underrated movie and the actual Rich Evans is the only member of that RedLetterMedia gang that I find tolerable.
 
Ah. I'm nearly 66 years old. I don't know from YouTube personalities. :)

But I am old enough to have seen TMP on opening night, along with pretty much my entire college SF club, and to remember the movie getting mixed reviews from fandom even back then. Harlan Ellison famously trashed it in STARLOG magazine, which provoked months of heated debate in the magazine's letter column -- back before social media.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top