• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

2026 Novel Releases

Come to think of it, the realest person to appear in Trek was Stephen Hawking playing his own holodeck recreation.
Or Doctor Erin Macdonald who played Doctor Erin Macdonald on Prodigy. Though we don't yet know if she was playing herself who traveled to the future, or if she's playing a different person who has her voice, name, and face. ;)
 
Well, somebody killed those people in Whitechapel, apparently in a consistent manner — but certainly there’s a sort of “stock nightmare figure” version of Jack in the zeitgeist ever since, which is fictional in that sense. (Which has developed a sort of “fandom” in itself, something I find unsettling.)

I've seen it suggested that some of the claims of a common M.O. may have been inventions or exaggerations of the sensationalist press -- that newspapers invented the idea of a single hand behind multiple separate killings to scare people and sell more papers. And of course, it's always possible that highly publicized murders could attract copycats -- although I admit I don't know if copycat crimes are as common in reality as they are in fiction.

And I agree the glamorization of the Ripper is disturbing. It always bothered me that the sitcom Three's Company named its lead character "Jack Tripper," as if it were funny to equate a womanizing protagonist with a homicidal sexual predator.


Or Doctor Erin Macdonald who played Doctor Erin Macdonald on Prodigy. Though we don't yet know if she was playing herself who traveled to the future, or if she's playing a different person who has her voice, name, and face. ;)
She was playing a fictional character named after herself as an homage; the text implies nothing more. Hawking was explicitly, textually playing a holodeck recreation of the real Stephen Hawking.
 
Yes, they are but in this case I was referring to the characters which have showed up in the NuTrek movies and SNW.

Some of them are not good and I definitely don't want to read about the "Spock" or "Kirk" and other nev versions of TOS characters that we have seen in the NuTrek movies and SNW.
The versions of the characters that we've gotten in SNW are not new versions of the characters, they're the same versions of the characters just at earlier points in their careers. They all following pretty clear arcs leading them up to where we saw them in TOS.
Garak was utterly destroyed in one book in the PIC book series.

He was turned into a wimp and ridiculous character in that book and then killed off.

I actually took the liberty of reading that book in order to not be accused for "only reading what's on Memory Beta". A horrible experience, I must say. The book was even worse than expected and I got some flashbacks to a certain TV episode which I watched many years ago which also was worse that what I had been warned about.

Fortunately I bought it in a bargain shop so I didn't spend any fortune on it and after reading it, I simply went back to the shop and put it back in the shelf without demanding the money back. It wasn't worth to argue about. Someone must actually have bought it since it was gone some months later when I visited that shop again.

And it's really sad since I actually enjoyed the auhor's previous books and wanted to have more of that.
Garek appeared in a Picard book? The only recent books I know of where he appeared are the The Next Generation book Pliable Truths which was set before DS9, and the DS9 novel Enigma Tales, which was one of the last Relaunch novels before everything was reset for Picard, Lower Decks, and Prodigy.
In fact, Garak could have become a main character in many, many books to come. he could have been Castellan of Cardassia and as such invoved in many interesting events, he could have continued as Ambassador for cardassia to the federation and involved in interesting events, instead he was wasted for no acceptable reason at all.
Actually no he couldn't have, or at least that version couldn't have since the books had to reset for Picard, Prodigy, and Lower Decks.
And as many of you know, I get really angry when my favorite characters are ruined and/or killed off. I just don't accept that.

Which is the reason that i will never watch a future episode or read a future book which are based on the "canon" in PIC or DSC. I can also add the meaningless destruction of Romulus and Vulcan here.

And if that means that I'm stuck with older series and books, so be it!
This seems like kind of a strange reaction since the books are all by different authors, with different styles, and focus on different characters. And the books coming out for the current series are pretty much stand alone, so events you were unhappy about probably wouldn't have any effect on any future Picard books. And since the Discovery books take place either 100 years before, and 900 years after Picard, there's very, very little chance of what the Picard book did to Garak having any effect on them.
And are you sure it was even a Picard book? They seem to have gone back to the books being more standalone without making any kind of huge changes to the characters that weren't established on the show first, so it seems unlikely to me that a Picard book would have made those kind of changes to a TV character like Garak.
Starfleet Academy could have been interesting.

But since it's obviously based on DSC when it comes to "canon" and background events, I'll pass.
I don't want to be reminded of Captain Hysterica and her half-witted crew.
:cardie:
I don't want to argue with you since you actually wrote one of the best Star Trek books ever, the Voyager book The Black Shore which is a masterpiece and one of my top 3 Star Trek books ever (the other two are A Stitch In Time by Andrew J Robinson and Marooned by Christie Golden).

But I will never read a book or watch a series in which DSC is some sort of foundation and "canon" for future books and series.
You're probably going to want to be very careful then, because I have a feeling that now that it's over we're probably going to be seeing a lot more elements of it popping up in the other series books.
"Doom-and gloom" is what I call most of the depressing series and movies we have got in the recent decades.

Gloomy, almost dystopian scenarios, boring unlikeable faulty characters, blood-splattering scenes with torture and mutilation and an atmosphere of total darkness and no hope.
Have you watched Strange New Worlds at all? Because that does not fit it at all, it is by far the lightest and most fun of all of the new series, and pretty much fits the same tone and style as pre-Paramount+ series.
And while a few early episodes of Picard and Discovery, by the ends of their first seasons both had moved away from that and became much more positive, optimistic series.
And I'd also put in a huge recommendation for Lower Decks if you haven't checked it, because it is literally the exact opposite of gloom and doom.
Example: Back in better days, a series could be made about space exploring, and intersting adventures, like in TOS, TNG, DS9 and early Voyager, even in other series too like NCIS in which there also was some humor from time to time.

Now the scenario is about people colonizing another planet because the earth is devastated, the characters are troubled persons and there's a lot of bllod, gore and suffering all the way through the stories.

Back in the 90's, I used to watch TOS, TNG, DS9 VOY (up to season 3), NCIS, NCIS LA, NCIS New Orleans, CSI, CSI Miami, CSI NY, The X-files, Stargate SG1, Stargate Atlantis plus movies of interest.
Of those series, only TOS, NCI, NCIS: LA, NCIS: NOLA, CSI, CIS: Miami, CSI: NY, and Stargate Atlantis did not air in the '90s.
Now the only series I watch occasional episodes of is NCIS which is not so good as it used to be but still have decent stories. As it is, I can't even count how many series I've abandoned after about 5-6 episodes since I found them gloomy and boring.


Which is also a reason why I don't have any streaming account since 95% of the content are "dooom-and-gloom series and movies from the 2020's.
Have you actually looked at that much streaming stuff? There are thousands of streaming shows out there and there's a huge variety of tones and styles for the shows all of the different services. You're really missing on a ton of great stuff.
 
@JD , I'm going to assume you replied from the previous page before you saw my reminder on this page, but please note that this is not the place for this discussion, and (for all thread participants) I don't want this particular tangent to continue. Thank you.

@Denise , I also suspect that you replied before seeing my reminder. I would ask please that if people would like to have a discussion about Jack the Ripper, that maybe Miscellaneous would be a better place.
 
@JD , I'm going to assume you replied from the previous page before you saw my reminder on this page, but please note that this is not the place for this discussion, and (for all thread participants) I don't want this particular tangent to continue. Thank you.

@Denise , I also suspect that you replied before seeing my reminder. I would ask please that if people would like to have a discussion about Jack the Ripper, that maybe Miscellaneous would be a better place.
I reply to the posts in order as I read them at the end of the day. My apologies. I have removed the offending post.
 
@JD , I'm going to assume you replied from the previous page before you saw my reminder on this page, but please note that this is not the place for this discussion, and (for all thread participants) I don't want this particular tangent to continue. Thank you.

@Denise , I also suspect that you replied before seeing my reminder. I would ask please that if people would like to have a discussion about Jack the Ripper, that maybe Miscellaneous would be a better place.
I think I realized after I wrote out the post that you had said to drop that conversation. I apologize.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top