Kirk had to ask the ships computer to recognize him, and it said it did.
TOS Turbolift
- Thread starter Koloth TOS
- Start date
From Wolf In The Fold:
Apparently, the turbolift is usually in "automatic" or computer controlled mode where you speak the deck number and twist the handle. It can be put in manual mode which I assume isolates that turbolift from the central computer system, but you still speak the deck number and twist the handle to make it go same as in automatic mode.
That whole freefall scene is a mess; it's goofy and poorly executed. Something weird and unclear happens with the doors as they walk through them, getting the captain's attention. The cab then goes into freefall and Kirk orders Spock to switch to manual, yet seems to do the switching to manual himself using buttons that Spock doesn't have access to. (All Spock does is barely rotate his control handle, which wasn't even activated because he didn't turn it on when he entered; he only held it.) Then Kirk apparently stops half a ton of plummeting mass with his sheer strength by overdramatically torquing on the control handle like it's a handbrake, treating it as a mechanical rather than an electrical control. Spock does nothing else with his handle, and it eventually lights up its own light, after the cab has started ascending normally. Then they proceed ahead as if the cab can be completely trusted now.
It's one of the worst uses of the turbolift in the series, in my book. I've wondered if this is one of those cases where Shatner exerted some influence on the direction of the scene in order to make Kirk seem more heroic. Or maybe it was just poor writing and/or directing. Either way it's a weak, cringy scene that feels out of character in more ways than one. Even Nimoy seems like he's not sure why Shatner is hamming it so much.
It's one of the worst uses of the turbolift in the series, in my book. I've wondered if this is one of those cases where Shatner exerted some influence on the direction of the scene in order to make Kirk seem more heroic. Or maybe it was just poor writing and/or directing. Either way it's a weak, cringy scene that feels out of character in more ways than one. Even Nimoy seems like he's not sure why Shatner is hamming it so much.
See, the technology was so confusing and new that not even Gene could get it straight,
How is that implausible? The driver of a car whose brakes are out can slow it manually by pulling up on the parking brake, which is why it's also called an emergency brake. (My father sometimes told a story of how his brakes went out on a road trip and he relied solely on the emergency brake for miles, including on curvy downhill roads.) If it can work with an automobile, it should be able to work with an elevator car. After all, if it worked anything like a modern-day elevator, it wouldn't require much force to move the brake lever against the rail, and friction would do the rest.
Yes, cars have mechanical parking brakes, but in your father's car that mechanical lever did not also control the starter, shift lever, radio, or anything else. It was a one-function lever that's literally, physically connected to a physical braking mechanism. The handles in the turbolift are clearly activators for electrical components that convey the cab's speed, route, destination, etc. and that take almost zero effort to engage. There's no way that tiny gray lever directly imparts physical stopping power against the sides of the turbolift shaft. The fact that the captain was "cranking" on it with brute strength made no sense in the Star Trek future. It would be like if Scotty were pulling on the transporter console slide-levers with all his might to yank Kirk off the Defiant; that's just not how anything on this starship works.
Of course it wouldn't require much effort at all to turn a handle that trips a relay which forces an emergency friction device against a shaft wall. But that's not what Kirk's doing in this scene; he's throwing his physical force into the handle, and that's simply not going to be enough to slow down a half-ton cab, let alone stop it. If something else is providing the physical force, then the captain should have been able to activate it with his fingertips.
But we can agree to disagree. If you think it looks great and I think it looks goofy, there's plenty of room in the universe for both of us.
Of course it wouldn't require much effort at all to turn a handle that trips a relay which forces an emergency friction device against a shaft wall. But that's not what Kirk's doing in this scene; he's throwing his physical force into the handle, and that's simply not going to be enough to slow down a half-ton cab, let alone stop it. If something else is providing the physical force, then the captain should have been able to activate it with his fingertips.
But we can agree to disagree. If you think it looks great and I think it looks goofy, there's plenty of room in the universe for both of us.
People do things that won't make a bit of difference because it makes them feel like they're doing something. In many cases, pulling harder (on a shutting door, a dangling rope, etc.) would accomplish something. It's an emotional reaction, not a logical one.
Please don't put words in my mouth. I never said it looked great, just that it's unreasonable to say "Kirk apparently stops half a ton of plummeting mass with his sheer strength," because there is abundant real-world precedent for systems that could brake a massive vehicle through friction while requiring relatively little strength to activate. Even if I think something deserves criticism, I will challenge criticisms that are not factually or logically valid.
I think we're not having the same conversation, actually. Your phrase "relatively little strength" is not what I see depicted. If he had done what he did with "relatively little strength" then we would not be disagreeing at all. I don't even disagree with him using the lever to activate an emergency stop; I criticize the way it was performed by Shatner, which (to me) implies that he is using his physical strength as a slowing/stopping force. Again, we don't have to interpret it the same way, but I hardly think my interpretation is factually/logically invalid; it's just different from yours.
Similar threads
