• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

How would you end Doctor Who for good?

My plan is to write a mediocre season. Lose my lead actor. And have my streaming partner decline to renew their contract.


Ha........i like that, mine would be along a similar lines, i would wait until the show is 50 plus years old, then i would take a 40 year old episode, claim it shows a lot more of the charactor existed way before the actual first actor to play the role, then i would have the timelords call themselves timelords before they had achieved time travel, then i would double down on that until the show had lost so many viewers that is just ends with a wimper and no one real cares anymore. Lol
 
All of this has happened before and all of this will happen again.

...which I'm pretty certain I said exactly that after Davies was announced and people predicted how his era would (and wouldn't) be received.

Want to surprise me?

Have a Who era where there isn't a rabid segment of the fan base who hates on the showrunner but then turns around and laments the same showrunner when they turn their furor towards the newest showrunner.

Guess what. It'll never happen.
 
If there are a lot of generations left (timeless child or no) you could say each Doctor was a citizen on Gallifrey…the final burst to repopulate the planet. Hard pantheism.
 
How would you end Doctor Who for good?

The Master (the Eric Roberts version) jumps up screaming from a very bad dream, which was NuWho (:D). Initially relieved, he's suddenly overcome with convulsions and more screaming again, until everything around him goes dark...which turns out to be another nightmare of the 7th Doctor. Explaining his relief that it was only a bad dream, The Doctor and Ace head off for another adventure...
 
Only from some


^^this

I know people who loved the era for being so "light and fun" and have no clue why the ratings have dropped faster than potatoes in a french fry factory*. But they also say how 80s stories tried to be more grown up than they should be as they only want the show to be fluffy and fun (and/or aimed only at young kids), or cite McCoy's era (even though seasons 24 and 26 feel almost like completely different television shows!!), and other amusing claims.

The only argument I'll make is that the show has changed target demographics often and the 80s were tailored to older fans who grew up with the show (leading to the excesses of seasons 21 and 22), even though that doesn't explain why seasons 1, 7, and 12-14 were aimed at older audiences or forgetting about the young kids entirely (where season 17 comes into play and I'd almost include 24 except the intentional pomposity and camp are there to mask very gruesome ideas) . Well, season 1 was all over the map but it does some adult stuff for sure and the makers got in trouble for scenes such as Susan stabbing a couch with a pair of scissors, but nobody yelled at kids running around screaming "Exterminate" but whatever....

* IMHO and to editorialize a little, a show that is too 4th wall, self-aware jokey, and turning to the camera to say "nite nite" are likely going to be off-putting to a lot of people. Tone still means a lot since, as presented on screen while mugging the camera in a way that even Mr Roper would be embarrassed by, and saying "What happens to that mysterious traveler in Time and Space known as the Doctor? I'm sorry to say his story ends in absolute terror. Nite nite!" comes across more as for the kids than anything else, bib and custard sold separately. Or new viewers intrigued. Everyone else knows who the Doctor is and the scene comes off as being artificial and facetious. But that's just "light and fun" and, yes, different people have different tastes. Each era has its detractors and supporters and it's silly for one to waste time watching something one doesn't like. A minor rewrite would make the core of the same phrase sound genuinely harrowing. But this era is for the younger kids. Later eras if made will likely have a different or wider target audience. With JMS emigrating to the UK, maybe he'll be the second import to get to do something with the show (Sydney Newman was the first and he only co-created it.) Then again, JMS's most-known shows were made for older audiences, so there's that little hurdle to deal with too...
 
Twas ever thus


So much 80s tacky hairspray that one can almost smell it from across 39 years plus a LCD TV screen away. Let's just say I've got my "rabid ears on". :guffaw:

Chibnall did make up with Pip and Jane Baker, there's an audio or podcast on the internet...

And of all the 21st century eras, his is the closest to try to recapture the feel of the Classic Era while updating it with the modern era up to that point. It's an interesting mixture of styles. It's hit or miss, true, but stories like "Eve of the Daleks" and "Fugitive of the Judoon" easily hold up as well as the best of them, if not close to. At the same time, yep, there's corridor running, exposition, some incredibly awful episodes, episodes with missed opportunities, and the rest of it. So ironically or unironically, he continued the tradition that started in the 1960s. Either way, it's commendable he - as an acclaimed producer - would take the reins given the 1986 video - and try to ditch doing general drama in favor of sci-fi/drama/adventure action.. Flawed at times, true, but I'll defend a fair amount of his era and even call him what I call Pip and Jane Baker's 6th Doctor stories: "underrated". Still wish he'd have kept Capaldi on for one more year, but starting the slate clean and all that...
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top