If you have a transporter then of course you can.
Eh, a transporter probably has some type of raw energy supply to pull from. On a universal scale that becomes a little bit more difficult.
Last edited:
If you have a transporter then of course you can.
It creates two from the same pattern.Eh, a transporter probably has some type of raw energy supply to pull from. On a universal scale that becomes a little bit differently.
right, but enough energy to double a person vs doubling an entire universe? that is infinitely, massively different on a scale the human brain could not even comprehend.It creates two from the same pattern.
Somehow the universe exists. I'll leave that to universal mechanisms.right, but enough energy to double a person vs doubling an entire universe? that is infinitely, massively different on a scale the human brain could not even comprehend.
And I've always thought it odd that people think a new version of the Universe, with trillions of galaxies estimated in the observable part alone, could pop into existence simple because I choose a blue tie over red this morning.It strikes me as extremely odd that this fissure occurs as a fixed point yet the realities wouldn't exist without the choice.
It happened before. Energy comes and goes.And I've always thought it odd that people think a new version of the Universe, with trillions of galaxies estimated in the observable part alone, could pop into existence simple because I choose a blue tie over red this morning.
I'm gonna say the guy who lived through the temporal wars, despite dying at least twice on screen, knows more about alternate timelines than the viewers. Ditto Spock.Spock clearly tunneled into an alternate universe, and did not rewrite his own timeline.
I'm gonna say the guy who lived through the temporal wars, despite dying at least twice on screen, knows more about alternate timelines than the viewers. Ditto Spock.
You may prefer to think of it a certain noncanon way, but that clearly isn't the intent of the people in charge and what they're conveying.
And I recall the producers took great pains to tell fans the Prime Trek universe is still out there, it had not been rewritten.When the Kelvin movies came out, there was no intent to ever use the Prime Universe again - so those writers did a standard permanent timeline reset.
And I recall the producers took great pains to tell fans the Prime Trek universe is still out there, it had not been rewritten.
Never read that anywhereFrom what I recall, that was only lip service in response to a pretty big backlash and not their original intent.![]()
They literally have technology that allows them to see the timelines as they form and repair themselves. If Daniel's says something, I'm willing to take his word for it.and i'm quite willing to just say Daniels is going by assumption at this point as wel
Has there ever been another example of a Blackhole, created by Red Matter, interacting with a Super Nova that was large enough to threaten the galaxy?but there has never been another documented instance in Trek of a timeline incursion creating a physically separate 'verse
This.There are no rules of Star Trek time travel. Just say that you don’t consider the KT a branch-off of the prime timeline, despite your personal narrative not lining up with what was shown to us, and leave it at that.
Not quite. It's true Abrams wanted to completely abandon the Prime Universe, as indicated by the fact early drafts of Trek XI's script actually had the supernova completely destroying the Prime Universe in the 24th century. But Paramount overruled that saying there's no way in hell they'd be willing to cut of the Prime Universe from ever being revisited again, so the supernova was scaled back to only destroying Romulus.When the Kelvin movies came out, there was no intent to ever use the Prime Universe again - so those writers did a standard permanent timeline reset.
Nothing is destroyed.
I mean, I'm only working with what I've been told.early drafts of Trek XI's script actually had the supernova completely destroying the Prime Universe
Here's my view, stupid as it is: If I can still watch it, read it, enjoy it it's not destroyed. There are civilizations in history I still study that could be called "destroyed."I mean, I'm only working with what I've been told.
I would go further and say, don’t threaten the entire universe. Because then you end up having to save it, and then (to go bigger and better in subsequent productions) to save it again, and again, and again…With all the remakes and reboots and adaptations going on at the moment, screenwriters, directors and producers should get training in how to handle them without pissing off the fanbase.
Rule 1: Don't destroy the entire universe.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.