• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

The James Bond Film Discussion Thread (With Bonus Lazenby!)


After this stupid decision, it shouldn't be surprising if the new James Bond movies start being shot in a studio in America instead of England.
 
So, what would 'For Your Eyes Only' been like had it been the movie that followed 'TSWLM' as originally planned?
How far along were they in the script before they decided to go with 'Moonraker'?
Would it have been a lower stakes movie like what eventually ended up on screen, or would it have been more in keeping with 'TSWLM'?
One thing is for certain, we wouldn't have gotten the cast that we did. No Topol or Julian Glover and no Carole Bouquet.​
 
Found in a Facebook Bond Group. It's AI, but the closest we'll ever get to a group photo of all six Bond actors.

497284023-122148331286392597-3257458788942019311-n.jpg
 
if they went with some of the gardner novels like License Renewed / For Special Services , now would really be a Prime (get it) time to bring back Dalton or Brosnan.. Bound brought back to a pseudo 007 office with little authority, little budget but still on mission
 
Found in a Facebook Bond Group. It's AI, but the closest we'll ever get to a group photo of all six Bond actors.

497284023-122148331286392597-3257458788942019311-n.jpg
Why the heck is Alfred E. Neuman in photo? was my initial reaction. I thought the photo was a spoof.

That is not a flattering image of Craig. I don't know why, but maybe it's because, imho, Craig stands out in an odd sort of way when situated among the other Bonds. If it was just an image of Craig by himself, perhaps the oddity wouldn't be noticeable.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top