Sounds like the 2009 movie definitely didn't work for you.
It's kind of interesting to me how both the Kelvin films and Discovery/Strange New Worlds have re-envisioned the original Enterprise. I agree with you that the "Discoprise" definitely looked much much closer to the original ship. I appreciated that attempt to really try to design something that fit better with the look of the original Enterprise, both inside and out.
That said, unlike you, I also really liked the design of the Ryan Church enterprise in ST 2009 too. The bridge and the other sets were good too, although I didn't care Budengineering.
And, yeah, I liked Into Darkness a lot, but they blew it with Khan. They did not play fair with regard to the fans with that. First, Cumberbatch looked nothing like Khan, second, when fans figured it out, they denied it. Third, as Nicholas Meyer said, if you're going to kill a major character, why bring him back a few minutes later.
See, if it wasn't Khan, Abrams, Orci, and Kurtzmann would never have had that inverted TWOK scene with Kirk dying to begin with.
Of course, Spock wouldn't have gone on that rampage either.
Ah, yes, the era of "Respect for Gene's Vision." Just don't read the fine print.The guy who I don't think liked or ever got TOS was Berman. Ira Steven Beher had to actually fight Berman for Spock's name to even be mentioned in the TNG episode "Sarek." He went on of how Berman had a rule that none of the TOS characters could be mentioned on TNG at the time. Beher went on to say how ridiculous those rules were, considering the ship was the Enterprise-D, named after the original USS Enterprise and how Sarek, undergoing a mental breakdown, would likely mention Spock's name. Finally, he was able to wear Berman down to get one mention of Spock in "Sarek."
Which is just odd, considering that TNG launched with McCoy, Kirk 2.0 in Riker,and Trelane 2.0, going right into Naked Now at the beginning, using the TOS planet set and end-of-episode-comedy banter, and adding McCoy 2.0 soon enough.Ah, yes, the era of "Respect for Gene's Vision." Just don't read the fine print.
I think ST 09 had more respect for TOS than much of TNG.
It used the pieces but removed measures of humanity from it.Which is just odd, considering that TNG launched with McCoy, Kirk 2.0 in Riker,and Trelane 2.0, going right into Naked Now at the beginning, using the TOS planet set and end-of-episode-comedy banter, and adding McCoy 2.0 soon enough.
It's an action/adventure platform that showcases a social issue. It's one that I enjoy quite well, though it hits me personally because I became a father that year too. The presentation of the importance of fathers in the film hits hard for me because of that.I don't know if I would call '09 respect. They definitely started with the right foundation, but I'm still not sure they really understood the pieces they were playing with.
It used the pieces but removed measures of humanity from it.
It's an action/adventure platform that showcases a social issue. It's one that I enjoy quite well, though it hits me personally because I became a father that year too. The presentation of the importance of fathers in the film hits hard for me because of that.
Pike was a stretch but Kirk worked well for me and Spock/Sarek worked extremely well because it went a different direction.understand the themes and parallels but just didn't feel it was done too well - Spock's stuff was rehashed from TAS and TFF, and while it made sense for a character going through that to do the things that were happening (grew up without a dad, found a father figure in Pike), i just coudln't buy them as Kirk/Pike. It just reimagined too much for my sensitivities. If they had just done a more by-the-numbers Academy to LT arc for Kirk, I would have bought the characters and most of the sets.
And I'm going to cut you off right there. "B&B" is not applicable to Generations. Though both Berman and Braga were involved in the movie, Braga at least was not in a position to make any real decisions on the movie. He was only a scriptwriter on that movie and the most junior one at that. And even then, the studio already decided what had to happen in the movie, so being a scriptwriter simply a glorified title for "typist" on that movie.Guess all that modern era B&B apologist stuff was a bit premature.
The debate was about whether or not they should specify it was Spock's wedding Picard mentions attending which in the actual episode he simply says the wedding of "Sarek's son." And it wasn't Berman's rule but rather Roddenberry's, as he wanted TNG to be as separate from TOS as possible. Indeed, you'll note TOS references became a lot more common on TNG after Roddenberry's death and after all his sycophants were removed from the studio.The guy who I don't think liked or ever got TOS was Berman. Ira Steven Beher had to actually fight Berman for Spock's name to even be mentioned in the TNG episode "Sarek." He went on of how Berman had a rule that none of the TOS characters could be mentioned on TNG at the time.
Yes. The likely apocryphal story about why there's such a lengthy horse riding scene in the Nexus in that movie illustrates the how Berman had to dance to Paramount's tune on Generations. The story goes that the studio put pressure on Berman to make Absolutely Certain Shatner would do the movie. Berman then went on to offer Shatner extremely exorbitant amounts of cash, all of which Shatner refused. Berman finally asked Shatner "what do you want? What will make you say yes to this movie right now?" Shatner said "I will do this movie if I get to ride a horse in it." Berman told this to Paramount who replied "then tell your writers they need to write a scene where he's riding a damn horse!"So the rules were definitely from Paramount and not Berman?
ST09 definitely respected TOS more. It brought back those characters in a great way in a great looking and action packed film. It introduced a new audience to the TOS characters and I think some people maybe even went and checked out the original Star Trek and maybe even the TOS films.Ah, yes, the era of "Respect for Gene's Vision." Just don't read the fine print.
I think ST 09 had more respect for TOS than much of TNG.
"Look at me; I'm on a horse." Shatner, probably.Berman told this to Paramount who replied "then tell your writers they need to write a scene where he's riding a damn horse!"
I wonder what Berman thought? IIRC he said that ST09 was quite different from the films he made and that the nacelles of the Enterprise were too big.
^^^Dream pitch and more canon characters?
...At that time co-showunner Henry Alonso Myers revealed they will be doing a “dream pitch” of his for season 4, saying “What I really want to do I can’t talk about right now, but it will come in season 4.” Goldsman hinted that one of the things Myers is particularly interested in is including Spock’s half-brother Sybok (who was teased in season 1), but neither confirmed he is part of season 4.
Pike was a stretch but Kirk worked well for me and Spock/Sarek worked extremely well because it went a different direction.
Kirk's arc is a bit rushed but I'm still love how he moves through it.
Ah, well, I detested Heroes so didn't have that framework to watching him as Spock. Honestly, Pegg was more difficult for me and probably my least favorite of the new cast. I also highly related to Spock in the film and his journey and found it deeply moving. The scene with him and Sarek after Amanda's death moves me.I couldn't buy Spock at all - felt his characterization was EXTREMELY off - but part of that was probably personal; I couldn't take Quinto seriously. Coming off a Heroes obsession (that is what honestly brought me back to the world of television) all I could see and hear was Sylar; I kept expecting Spock to wonder, how does that work? and start opening heads. Embellishing slightly, but....
That's fair. I don't agree, finding them more appealing than a lot of TNG design language. I'd rework some things but they're minor adjustments to the design language not overhaul.Even after all of that, if they were using sets and models that even remotely honored the TOS movies I probably would have overlooked 90% of it. The ugly ship and sets and aesthetics for my deal breaker. Quite liked the Kelvin and the uniforms but once they got to the Enterprise....
That's fair. I don't agree, finding them more appealing than a lot of TNG design language. I'd rework some things but they're minor adjustments to the design language not overhaul.
I'll take your word for it.24th century was bland. I had already ditched that before their first run movies were over.
Those big ugly nacells, those crappy angles, no one can really understand how much I hate that ship lol. Disco prize is a thing of beauty. Before that I was obsessed with the gabe koener version. They should have just used the a and said it was always like that. Any of them would have been preferable to that 50 sports car inspired monstrosity.
Yup, exactly this. I've got every draft of Generations in my collection, and the overall shape of the script really doesn't change from draft to draft. Individual scenes changed slightly, dialogue always changed, and the fate of Lursa & B'Etor dramatically changed, but the large brushstrokes were locked in.And even then, the studio already decided what had to happen in the movie, so being a scriptwriter simply a glorified title for "typist" on that movie.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.