Which is why @Shamrock Holmes said what he said. Or that was my interpretation, anyway.
Not what I meant (though I agree with the principle).
What I meant is that having a class of ship that is specifically (re)designed to be a propulsion test bed be named after a test pilot and the individual names following the general theme makes sense.
But having multiple classes of general service ships -- particularly those where the individual names don't -- have a single theme is stupid IMO.