• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Spoilers The Controversial Star Wars Opinion Thread

Maybe I am being way too simple with this, but I always felt there is The Force. It simply is. There is no true Dark Side or Light Side, it depends on what the person using it is trying to achieve.
People who try to do good, are Light side. Dark side explains itself.

The Jedi and the Sith are both dogma's. Institutions. Like a religion. But look at it from a religion point of view. There are many people who uphold some of the Ten Commandments but aren't Christians.

Let's take Anakin as an example. What if, when he realised that Padme was pregnant, simply left the order and marry her any way? He can still use the Force, most likely for good. Helping people, stop evil and all that. And he's married and a father. No longer a Jedi, but still a Light Side Force user.

There are many fans who feel there are only Jedi and Sith. It's more complicated than that.
 
But more proof that you don't need to arbitrarily divide the Force Powers down the Light/Dark side.
Force Powers are just powers, it's how you use it, the intent, the goals matter.

You can continue to post your hatred of the established, meaningful separation between the Light Side and Dark Side, but ts going nowhere, as yours is a desire standing on the opposite side of what Star Wars is about.


Oh, Criticism that is so bad, that shows how Skeleton Crew is now #1 on Disney+

Oh, sure. Skeleton Crew is just sweeping the culture, right? You've argued the value of the D+ series to those extremes. So, its as powerful a creative work as Star Wars, playing a major role in changing an industry--is that right?

No.

And yet Rogue 1 has it's fan base.

Even Plan 9 from Outer Space has its fanbase, but that does not mean it was a worthy creative production, and in the specific case of the SW series, Rogue 1 served no purpose, other than piggybacking off of all that was established in the 1977 film (which did not need to become the focus of a film), while pasting any fanwanked visual or idea into the movie.

If R1 did not exist, the course of the SW movie series would not miss a beat. That's how irrelevant it was,

Maybe that's what you took out of Star Wars when you watched it all those years ago.

I understood exactly what George Lucas wanted audiences to understand, which had everything to do with the Man of Destiny / religious / spiritual conflict shaping a galaxy. That kind of story was as bright as the sun to sci-fi film and movies in general with a clear message. Mission accomplished.

If others were too busy grinding their teeth with their misguided, atheistic rage, then they only have themselves to blame for failing to get the true message of Lucas' creation.

And part of why he became that way was the way he was raised.
They knew about his special situation, yet the Jedi Council didn't do anything to adjust for it.
They just shoved him into the Jedi Order system and expected him to fall in line.

His "special situation" had nothing to do with his own beliefs about himself; no matter how other Jedi tried to steer him toward reality, his egomania pushed reason aside in favor of thinking he was the best, sans any evidence to support the delusion. Anakin was completely responsible for his failure(s) and downfall.


Anakin fell to the Darkside because Mace Windu didn't keep his word to arrest Palpatine, that let Palpatine keep on turning Anakin to the dark side by showing that the Jedi can't be trusted to keep their basic promise.

Pure B.S. Anakin already learned Palpatine was the Sith Lord, and if he had even a particle of a brain in his skull instead of arrogant gas, he would have A) recalled that Palpatine was responsible for every tragedy the galaxy suffered even before becoming chancellor. B) He was responsible for Qui-Gon's death, and C) for a man so obsessed with "saving" Padme, The Clueless One somehow forgot that it was Palpatine behind the constant attacks on Padme's life....yet he's going to side with this Sith Lord against Mace...to save her?

Anakin was beyond ignorant.

You don't get to be a arbitrary Judge/Jury/Executioner just because you have "Force Powers" or are a high ranking "Jedi Council" member.

So, I guess Luke--another man with Force powers--had no right to be the judge, jury and executioner of the innumerable Imperials aboard the Death Star when he destroyed the station. By your reasoning, he should have contacted Tarkin for a sit-down to settle their disagreements because under no circumstances did Luke have the right to destroy the Death Star.

Nope.
 
You can continue to post your hatred of the established, meaningful separation between the Light Side and Dark Side, but ts going nowhere, as yours is a desire standing on the opposite side of what Star Wars is about.
You can cling on to "Old & OutDated" views on how the Force is interpreted by two religious sects whose views on the Force has caused countless suffering.
The others who share my views will become a splinter faction on how to "Interpret the Force" and will be doing our thing & spread our interpretation amongst the greater Star Wars fan base who will listen.

Oh, sure. Skeleton Crew is just sweeping the culture, right? You've argued the value of the D+ series to those extremes. So, its as powerful a creative work as Star Wars, playing a major role in changing an industry--is that right?

No.
Says one person on a Trek Forum of all places.

You know that no derivative work will generally surpass a original. I've already shown the data.
The chances are against ALL derivative works in general. Star Wars is no exception to that rule, in fact it follows that rule to a perfect T. The stats prove it.
That's regardless of franchise & history has proven in the Global Box Office take aways.
But you're trying to treat "Skeleton Crew" or any of the derivative works not surpassing the original as something wrong when it's the nature of the beast.

All the "Derivative Works" is doing just fine, fine enough that Disney is continuing to invest in them.
That's the bottom line, because Disney says so.
They know what they need to do to make more profit & survive.
Their expectations are kept to a realistic view on what is possible within their IP.

You don't have to like it, but that's how it works, especially since George Lucas decided to "Cash Out" and live the rest of his life sitting on his Piles of Money, set for life.
He has no say anymore as to how the IP progresses. It's only up to any of the current production staff that "If they Respect George Lucas' legacy", they'll listen to him & follow any of his ideas/suggestions.
You should be THANKING Dave Filoni & others who love & respect George Lucas for even continuing & expanding on the greater Star Wars Universe & keeping it alive within reasonable approximation to "His Vision".

Even Plan 9 from Outer Space has its fanbase, but that does not mean it was a worthy creative production, and in the specific case of the SW series, Rogue 1 served no purpose, other than piggybacking off of all that was established in the 1977 film (which did not need to become the focus of a film), while pasting any fanwanked visual or idea into the movie.
You might as well say that about every SW movie that wasn't the original 1977 film.
Cause that's the only thing you seem to value, everything else is a derivative lesser work than your precious 1977 original movie.
Why make any other Star Wars content after 1977?
Why didn't they call it "One & Done" if it was "Soo Perfect"?

If R1 did not exist, the course of the SW movie series would not miss a beat. That's how irrelevant it was,
If it was irrelevant, than why bother making it?
Disney didn't see it as "Irrelevant", there is a dedicated fanbase to Rogue 1.
So you don't get to be the arbiter for other people, it's "YOUR OPINION", nothing else.

I understood exactly what George Lucas wanted audiences to understand, which had everything to do with the Man of Destiny / religious / spiritual conflict shaping a galaxy.
Good for you, not everybody is going to interpret the movie in the same way given their personal historical, national, ethnic, religious & cultural context that they grew up with.
They will take away very different things about the same movie.

That kind of story was as bright as the sun to sci-fi film and movies in general with a clear message. Mission accomplished.

If others were too busy grinding their teeth with their misguided, atheistic rage, then they only have themselves to blame for failing to get the true message of Lucas' creation.
Or people can have a difference of opinion and look at things with a very different context than what you saw.
Just because you grew up in the USA at that time and saw things through that lens, doesn't mean everybody else will.
Especially given the context of all the other Star Wars works that have come after which changes the characterization of the original 1977 movie.

His "special situation" had nothing to do with his own beliefs about himself; no matter how other Jedi tried to steer him toward reality, his egomania pushed reason aside in favor of thinking he was the best, sans any evidence to support the delusion. Anakin was completely responsible for his failure(s) and downfall.
People's "Ego" derive from their childhood & how they're raised, the environment that they were in, what was expected of said child. Their past traumas greatly affect how they behave as an adult, especially as a young man in love. To blindly say it was ONLY Anakin's fault is willyfully being blind of his upbringing, his environment, the numerous circumstances as to how he got to his situation.

Pure B.S. Anakin already learned Palpatine was the Sith Lord,
Palpatine willingly revealed that he was a "Sith Lord" to Anakin.
That was part of his grand plan to lure Anakin to "The Dark Side".

And, all "Anakin" knew about 'The Sith' was what everybody in the Jedi Order taught him; he was inducted into "The Jedi Order" since he was a child and was indoctrinated into their ways, their value systems.

It's not wrong to want to understand the world from a neutral or other PoV. Especially as a young adult who is learning / growing up.

Anakin was "Force Curious" for a lack of a better term.
He wanted to see what was on the other side, experience/dabble in it & decide for himself on what is correct for him & his priorities/goals.

and if he had even a particle of a brain in his skull instead of arrogant gas, he would have A) recalled that Palpatine was responsible for every tragedy the galaxy suffered even before becoming chancellor.
Did Anakin have all the evidence figured out at that time?
He's a Jedi Knight, not a Master Detective like Sherlock Holmes, much less any kind of detective!
Anakin was raised to be a Warrior, first & foremost.

Did he understand the "Big Picture" that was Palpatines Grand complicated "Con-Job" over the entire Galaxy?
"The Jedi Order" themselves didn't even understand what was going on, and they were caught in Palpatines Plan w/o seeing the bigger picture until it was too late.
If the various Adults & Super Wise Ancient & Experienced Jedi Master Yoda couldn't see through Palpatines Machinations, what do you expect from Anakin who's a horny Young Adult with a constant focus on his wife?

B) He was responsible for Qui-Gon's death, and
We know this because we're the outside audience watching in.
We know that Palpatine Orchestrated it because we're the audience watching from the outside.

But in Universe, did Anakin or the Jedi Order connect the dots as to how big Palpatines "Grand Plan" was?
Did he or the Jedi Order know that "Darth Maul" was "Darth Sidious' Apprentice"?

If so, when did they connect the dots? When was the evidence shown on screen linking the two?
What evidence was there, outside of what we know (out of universe), to show that the two were linked?
When did the Jedi Order learn of any connection between "Darth Maul" & "Darth Sidious"?

Remember, "Darth Maul" only briefly was shown during Anakins childhood in the First Prequel Trilogy.
It was many years after that, that he would meet "Darth Sidious" & learn that he was "Shiev Palpatine".
Remember, that during the Clone Wars, "Darth Tyrannus" AKA Count Dooku was "Darth Sidious" apprentice at the time.

It's not like a full lineage list of which Sith Master & Apprentice is easy to find online like IRL.
In Universe, that kind of information is generally unavailable.

C) for a man so obsessed with "saving" Padme, The Clueless One somehow forgot that it was Palpatine behind the constant attacks on Padme's life....yet he's going to side with this Sith Lord against Mace...to save her?
Where was the evidence that showed any & all assasination attempts on Padme were linked directly to Palpatine?
When did the Jedi Order figure that part out, much less Anakin?

From where I stand, "The Jedi Order" was DUPED by "Darth Sidious / Shiev Palpatine".
That's how Palpatine was able to bring the Downfall of "The Jedi Order" & "The Republic".

He was that good of a Con-Man, that he had all his pieces in place; that by the time our Protagonists figured anything out, it was TOO LATE.
Palpatine was the "Ultimate Con-Man", probably the greatest of all time.

He literally fooled the entire Star Wars Galaxy as to his true intentions.
He pretended to be a even balanced Senator from Naboo for DECADES to hide his real motivations, he slowly gathered political/financial power & allies over time.
He literally sat amongst the Masters of the Jedi Order and didn't reveal who he was until he wanted to.
He orchastrated a War from both sides & didn't show to the public how it was connected to him.
He fooled a Democratic Republic Senate to give him "Absolute Power".
The Masters of the Jedi Order couldn't figure out his "REAL Identity" until he decided to reveal it to Anakin, knowing that Anakin would reveal it to the rest of the Jedi Council.
Shiev Palpatine wasn't a fool, he was a "Master Con Artist".
That's why he was so successful.

Anakin was beyond ignorant.
Anakin was a horny young man with Super Powers.
He was tunnel visioned on keeping his Fiance/Wife safe.
That's many young men IRL (minus the Super Powers).
You can't tell me you haven't met that type of guy in your life, or was that guy once upon a time, or knew of a guy just like that.

So, I guess Luke--another man with Force powers--had no right to be the judge, jury and executioner of the innumerable Imperials aboard the Death Star when he destroyed the station.
Do you think "Luke cared about the Empire" that he lived under? HELL NO!
He was one of their subjects, he literally betrayed the government he lived under by joining "The Rebel Alliance to Restore the Republic".
He knew he was living under a Authoritarian regime.
He sided with "The Rebels" & made peace with it A LONG TIME AGO when he decided to become a "Freedom Fighter".

Anakin was part of "The Jedi Order" who worked under "The Republic".
"The Republic" had a functional Representative Democracy & Legal System with Law Enforcement.
A system of governance that "Luke" never knew about and only read/heard about.

The Jedi, for all intensive purposes, were basically "Space Sheriffs/Galactic Rangers with Super Powers" & the ability to prosecute their suspected criminals across the Galaxy, no matter how far their suspect may flee.
Something Anakin & "The Jedi Order" were apart of & were bound to by "Oath & Legal Requirements" in accordance to "the Jedi Orders" agreement with "The Republic".

The situations between the two are COMPLETELY different.

By your reasoning, he should have contacted Tarkin for a sit-down to settle their disagreements because under no circumstances did Luke have the right to destroy the Death Star.

Nope.
Why would he, Luke was a Rebel, the man literally joined "The Rebel Alliance to Restore the Republic".
He was part of a "Freedom Fighter Resistance Unit" who FOUGHT against "The Empire".

The two men lived under Completely Different Contexts.
 
Maybe I am being way too simple with this, but I always felt there is The Force. It simply is. There is no true Dark Side or Light Side, it depends on what the person using it is trying to achieve.
People who try to do good, are Light side. Dark side explains itself.

The Jedi and the Sith are both dogma's. Institutions. Like a religion. But look at it from a religion point of view. There are many people who uphold some of the Ten Commandments but aren't Christians.

Let's take Anakin as an example. What if, when he realised that Padme was pregnant, simply left the order and marry her any way? He can still use the Force, most likely for good. Helping people, stop evil and all that. And he's married and a father. No longer a Jedi, but still a Light Side Force user.
We got a character like that with post-Clone Wars Ahsoka.
There are many fans who feel there are only Jedi and Sith. It's more complicated than that.
The shows have already introduced us to some Force groups that aren't Jedi or Sith, with the Night Sisters, and then there was the arc with Yoda going around to all of the Force groups at end of Season 6 of The Clone Wars

Did Anakin have all the evidence figured out at that time?
He's a Jedi Knight, not a Master Detective like Sherlock Holmes, much less any kind of detective!
Anakin was raised to be a Warrior, first & foremost.

Did he understand the "Big Picture" that was Palpatines Grand complicated "Con-Job" over the entire Galaxy?
"The Jedi Order" themselves didn't even understand what was going on, and they were caught in Palpatines Plan w/o seeing the bigger picture until it was too late.
If the various Adults & Super Wise Ancient & Experienced Jedi Master Yoda couldn't see through Palpatines Machinations, what do you expect from Anakin who's a horny Young Adult with a constant focus on his wife?


We know this because we're the outside audience watching in.
We know that Palpatine Orchestrated it because we're the audience watching from the outside.

But in Universe, did Anakin or the Jedi Order connect the dots as to how big Palpatines "Grand Plan" was?
Did he or the Jedi Order know that "Darth Maul" was "Darth Sidious' Apprentice"?

If so, when did they connect the dots? When was the evidence shown on screen linking the two?
What evidence was there, outside of what we know (out of universe), to show that the two were linked?
When did the Jedi Order learn of any connection between "Darth Maul" & "Darth Sidious"?

Remember, "Darth Maul" only briefly was shown during Anakins childhood in the First Prequel Trilogy.
It was many years after that, that he would meet "Darth Sidious" & learn that he was "Shiev Palpatine".
Remember, that during the Clone Wars, "Darth Tyrannus" AKA Count Dooku was "Darth Sidious" apprentice at the time.

It's not like a full lineage list of which Sith Master & Apprentice is easy to find online like IRL.
In Universe, that kind of information is generally unavailable.


Where was the evidence that showed any & all assasination attempts on Padme were linked directly to Palpatine?
When did the Jedi Order figure that part out, much less Anakin?

From where I stand, "The Jedi Order" was DUPED by "Darth Sidious / Shiev Palpatine".
That's how Palpatine was able to bring the Downfall of "The Jedi Order" & "The Republic".

He was that good of a Con-Man, that he had all his pieces in place; that by the time our Protagonists figured anything out, it was TOO LATE.
Palpatine was the "Ultimate Con-Man", probably the greatest of all time.

He literally fooled the entire Star Wars Galaxy as to his true intentions.
He pretended to be a even balanced Senator from Naboo for DECADES to hide his real motivations, he slowly gathered political/financial power & allies over time.
He literally sat amongst the Masters of the Jedi Order and didn't reveal who he was until he wanted to.
He orchastrated a War from both sides & didn't show to the public how it was connected to him.
He fooled a Democratic Republic Senate to give him "Absolute Power".
The Masters of the Jedi Order couldn't figure out his "REAL Identity" until he decided to reveal it to Anakin, knowing that Anakin would reveal it to the rest of the Jedi Council.
Shiev Palpatine wasn't a fool, he was a "Master Con Artist".
That's why he was so successful.


Anakin was a horny young man with Super Powers.
He was tunnel visioned on keeping his Fiance/Wife safe.
That's many young men IRL (minus the Super Powers).
You can't tell me you haven't met that type of guy in your life, or was that guy once upon a time, or knew of a guy just like that.


Do you think "Luke cared about the Empire" that he lived under? HELL NO!
He was one of their subjects, he literally betrayed the government he lived under by joining "The Rebel Alliance to Restore the Republic".
He knew he was living under a Authoritarian regime.
He sided with "The Rebels" & made peace with it A LONG TIME AGO when he decided to become a "Freedom Fighter".

Anakin was part of "The Jedi Order" who worked under "The Republic".
"The Republic" had a functional Representative Democracy & Legal System with Law Enforcement.
A system of governance that "Luke" never knew about and only read/heard about.

The Jedi, for all intensive purposes, were basically "Space Sheriffs/Galactic Rangers with Super Powers" & the ability to prosecute their suspected criminals across the Galaxy, no matter how far their suspect may flee.
Something Anakin & "The Jedi Order" were apart of & were bound to by "Oath & Legal Requirements" in accordance to "the Jedi Orders" agreement with "The Republic".

The situations between the two are COMPLETELY different.


Why would he, Luke was a Rebel, the man literally joined "The Rebel Alliance to Restore the Republic".
He was part of a "Freedom Fighter Resistance Unit" who FOUGHT against "The Empire".

The two men lived under Completely Different Contexts.
The Jedi knew that a the same Sith Lord was responsible for what happened in the Phantom Menace and then all of the events before and during the Clones Wars, so yes once Anikin found out Palpatine was the Sith Lord, he would have known he was responsible for all of that.
 
The Jedi knew that a the same Sith Lord was responsible for what happened in the Phantom Menace and then all of the events before and during the Clones Wars, so yes once Anikin found out Palpatine was the Sith Lord, he would have known he was responsible for all of that.
They knew that there was a "Sith Lord" out there after their encounter with Darth Maul in "The Phantom Menace".

But did they know it was that specific "Sith Lord" linked to "Darth Maul"?

Remember, the Jedi hasn't encountered "The Sith" for 1000 years.

They don't know exactly how many Sith exist out in the wild.

Or then that there could be potentially multiple "Sith Lords" out there with their apprentices.

Can you help me with which specific scene shows that they figured out everything was linked to Palpatine specifically?

Cause it's been a very long time since I watched those movies.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
How does Yoda know that "There is Always 2, no more, no less"?

It's literally been 1000 years since anybody within the Jedi Order saw any Sith!

How is he so sure?

And what happens if there are multiple Sith who have hidden for so long, that they don't know there are other Sith with a Master/Apprentice setup?

What happens if there are other Sith out there who don't follow "The Rule of 2"?

If you don't know the total Sith Count, how can you be so sure that they even follow a fixed structure of "Master/Apprentice" with only 2 people?
 
hey knew that there was a "Sith Lord" out there after their encounter with Darth Maul in "The Phantom Menace".

But did they know it was that specific "Sith Lord" linked to "Darth Maul"?
"Always two there are. No more. No less."
They knew Maul was a Sith Lord, they just didn't know if he was the Master or the apprentice. There's a world of difference between some half-trained Sith apprentice still running around out there or a full Sith Master lurking in the shadows.

By AotC I suspect they assumed that Dooku had been the Master the whole time. The timing fit. The circumstances fit. And he was colluding with the same corrupt TF viceroy that was involved in the same incident that brought Maul's existence to light.
I sometimes think half the reason Sidious let Tyranus keep Ventress around as long as he did is because it helped reinforce the Jedis' incorrect assumptions. So long as they thought Ventress was Maul's replacement, they weren't on Sidious's trail.
Or then that there could be potentially multiple "Sith Lords" out there with their apprentices.
There really can't be. That's not how the Sith work. If you get more than two of them in a room (or a galaxy) they'll gang up and kill the weakest one. That's why the Rule of Two came into being in the first place; they fought each other as much as they fought the Jedi, until they were all but extinct. Sith after all see power as a zero sum game. If someone else has power then that's less power for them, and they cannot tolerate that.
This is borne out in TCW; the moment Maul makes a move that could threaten what Sidious has planned, Sidious shows up to shut him and Savage down. Sith do no suffer a rival to live.
Can you help me with which specific scene shows that they figured out everything was linked to Palpatine specifically?
'Revenge of the Sith'. Sidious reveals himself to Anakin, and Anakin takes it straight to Windu.
Once he's revealed it doesn't take a Tan Divo to fit the pieces together; Palpatine was right at the centre of the Naboo blockade that saw him propelled to power. Power what he has held onto well beyond his term limits. He was also right there when Anakin killed the only person that could have identified him.

His mere age and implied power alone means he could only have been Maul's master, and Dooku's. The very same Darth Sidious Dooku mentioned to Kenobi on Geonosis, that Maul mentioned to Ahsoka on Mandalore, which she relayed to Obi-Wan mere days before the final revelation.

In the interrim they also got further evidence of Sidious's presence but not identity during Yoda's vision quest, and finally linked the name Tyranus to Dooku, confirming he was the one behind the Clone Army, so could not have been Sidious.

On top of all of that, the council knew that the Dark Side of the force surrounds the Chancellor. They knew he was up to his eyeballs in all of this, they just didn't know how. Whether he was an agent, an asset, or an unwitting pawn. They had no proof either way. They were waiting to see what he'd do once Grevious was eliminated. If he didn't give up his emergency powers and end the war, they were coming for him; Sith Lord or no Sith Lord.
How does Yoda know that "There is Always 2, no more, no less"?

It's literally been 1000 years since anybody within the Jedi Order saw any Sith!

How is he so sure?

And what happens if there are multiple Sith who have hidden for so long, that they don't know there are other Sith with a Master/Apprentice setup?

What happens if there are other Sith out there who don't follow "The Rule of 2"?

If you don't know the total Sith Count, how can you be so sure that they even follow a fixed structure of "Master/Apprentice" with only 2 people?
Yoda knows his history. The implication is clearly that unlike the EU version of events; Darth Bane and his Rule of Two is a matter of historical record. Likely his Sith Empire is the one that finally toppled the Old Republic, and it was his inheritors that the Jedi thought they'd finally extinguished a millenia ago. Indeed; someone had to have built that gigantic tomb for him. Hardly the work of a lone Apprentice operating in the shadows amidst the embers of a dead Empire.
 
Last edited:
You can cling on to "Old & OutDated" views on how the Force is interpreted by two religious sects whose views on the Force has caused countless suffering.
The others who share my views will become a splinter faction on how to "Interpret the Force" and will be doing our thing & spread our interpretation amongst the greater Star Wars fan base who will listen.

Backs away slowly, not making any sudden moves…
 
Backs away slowly, not making any sudden moves…
Get Back Here!

::Uses Force TK (TeleKinesis) on you::

You aren't going anywhere :angel:



But in all serious-ness. Is it me, or does the "Rule of 2" that Darth Bane created sound incredibly stupid & fundamentally flawed?

If they want to defeat "The Jedi", there's got to be a better way to come up with a general rule set or agreement on how to work together with fellow Sith and not just end up pointlessly stabbing each other in the back at some point in the future.
 
Last edited:


But in all serious-ness. Is it me, or does the "Rule of 2" that Darth Bane created sound incredibly stupid & fundamentally flawed?

If they want to defeat "The Jedi", there's got to be a better way to come up with a general rule set or agreement on how to work together with fellow Sith and not just end up pointlessly stabbing each other in the back at some point in the future.

Sith aren't team players. There's no meaningful working together when everybody is just in it for themselves. Backstabbing comes with the territory.

That said, my controversial SW opinion is this: The only real way the Rule of 2 make sense to me is if it's the crux of ritualized essence transfer. Bodysnatching. The Dark Lord of the Sith has had many different names and faces, but is essentially always the same guy. Like the Sith version of the Doctor from Doctor Who.

And that this is the one thing that Rise of Skywalker actually gets right and finally codifies, even if not explicitly.

Basically, if you strike the Sith master down with violence and anger in your heart, steeped in the Dark Side of the Force, the parasite that is the Dark Lord of the Sith moves from the master to his killer (typically the Sith apprentice). Palpatine wanted Rey to kill him so that the parasite could move into her and begin the cycle anew. This was necessary because while Vader did indeed kill Sidious, he did so in the light as an act of redemption and thus nullified the transfer ritual.

This solves so many problems with the Rule of 2. Resource management, information compartmentalization, knowledge base decay. It essentially guarantees that the apprentice, once ascended to master, has access to literally all the skills, resources, finances and schemes of their predecessor without fail or loss and keeps them from having to reset every time a master dies too soon or relearn powers if an apprentice gets lucky. Hell, it even explains precisely how the Sith have unbalanced the Force and need to be exterminated.

Basically, when Palpatine says at the end of RoS "I am all the Sith," he means it literally. There's only ever really been one, and at that moment it's him.
 
Sith aren't team players. There's no meaningful working together when everybody is just in it for themselves. Backstabbing comes with the territory.

That said, my controversial SW opinion is this: The only real way the Rule of 2 make sense to me is if it's the crux of ritualized essence transfer. Bodysnatching. The Dark Lord of the Sith has had many different names and faces, but is essentially always the same guy. Like the Sith version of the Doctor from Doctor Who.

And that this is the one thing that Rise of Skywalker actually gets right and finally codifies, even if not explicitly.

Basically, if you strike the Sith master down with violence and anger in your heart, steeped in the Dark Side of the Force, the parasite that is the Dark Lord of the Sith moves from the master to his killer (typically the Sith apprentice). Palpatine wanted Rey to kill him so that the parasite could move into her and begin the cycle anew. This was necessary because while Vader did indeed kill Sidious, he did so in the light as an act of redemption and thus nullified the transfer ritual.

This solves so many problems with the Rule of 2. Resource management, information compartmentalization, knowledge base decay. It essentially guarantees that the apprentice, once ascended to master, has access to literally all the skills, resources, finances and schemes of their predecessor without fail or loss and keeps them from having to reset every time a master dies too soon or relearn powers if an apprentice gets lucky. Hell, it even explains precisely how the Sith have unbalanced the Force and need to be exterminated.

Basically, when Palpatine says at the end of RoS "I am all the Sith," he means it literally. There's only ever really been one, and at that moment it's him.
Funny, in Uchuu Sentai KyuuRanger, the main Big Bad "Don Armage" was basically what you just asked for.
He had the ability to possess multiple bodies simultaneously and distribute his spirt / essence amongst multiple hosts to execute his version of his "Grand Plan".
It took the entire series multiple attempts to wipe out all of his hosts to finally defeat him.

His main ability was that he wasn't limited to one host at any given time, he could possess multiple hosts.



To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
Darth Bane was such a weird Sith Lord.
Seriously, his ideas of how to make the overall Sith Faction stronger was fundamentally flawed based off his weird Anti-Social / Selfish Personality & Life Experiences.
 
Last edited:
That said, my controversial SW opinion is this: The only real way the Rule of 2 make sense to me is if it's the crux of ritualized essence transfer. Bodysnatching. The Dark Lord of the Sith has had many different names and faces, but is essentially always the same guy.
I dislike the concept of "essence transfer" with a passion. It was a bad idea for 'Dark Empire', it was a worse idea for 'TRoS'. Plus as an added bonus it flies in the face of how Lucas thought the metaphysics of the Force worked. Hell, he pulled a partially completed scene from Mortis arc (custom assets and all) because he decided he didn't like the metaphysical implications of Sith Lords existing as force ghosts. The dark side is all consuming. There's no retaining individuality after physical death, which by extension means there's no consciousness without the physical. One might as well attempt to blow smoke rings in a hurricane.

Now all of that is not to say that something that outwardly appears to function like "essence transfer" (even the name sounds stupid!) is impossible or out of the question. After all, immortality in whatever form is a dragon every Sith Lord will chase, so I'm sure they've attempted every-which-way of continuing to exist on the physical plain . . . mostly because to the Sith, the physical plain is the only plain they can exist. Joining the cosmic is oblivion.

My preferred personal headcanon for all that TRoS nonsense is that the Sith Throne functions similarly to the Nightsister alter (and indeed may have been an ancient stolen Dathmiri artifact). I like to think that every Sith Lord since at least Bane (and probably before) has sat on that throne with the promise of inheriting the knowledge and power of their predecessors, but that is neither it's intended purpose, nor it's actual function.
I think it's more interesting that some ancient Sith Lord (maybe even the first one) made that thing with the intent of it doing exactly what "essence transfer" implies; facilitating a body-swapping scheme to live forever with the tempation and promise of ultimate power for the apprentice being the bait for the trap. But all it actually does is copy the memories and personality of whoever interfaces with it, trapping them in a state of perpetial limbo; powerless to do anything by scream at their apprentice in frustration. Their body still dies, their energy still returns to the cosmic force and their "essence" is annihilated just like (almost) every other living thing. Only a shadow copy. At best, all each one of them can do is posess a body the same way the Nightsister "spirits" can, but like with them it's only short range as they're bound to the throne/alter, and said body degrades very quickly from the unatural union.

Regardless; you don't really need any that to motivate a Sith to train an apprentice, because after all an apprentice is in and of themselves another source of power for the Master, and no Sith ever turns down power over other. A Sith alone is vulnerable after all, while two working together (albeit locked in a life or death struggle for dominance) is formidable. Indeed, that conflict may be halft the point, as having an opponent one can mold and use to sharpen one's own abilities is bound to be very appealing, and indeed: necessary!
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top