• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Star Trek The Motion Picture 45th Anniversary Book Club

David Gerrold has made the argument that I find an interesting "what if" that the score works against the film. The film is slow, the score is slow.

Two of the classic examples of a score changing the pace of a slow film that is still slow but no longer feels slow are The Ten Commandments and The Magnificent Seven. Both by Elmer Bernstein. In the former Bernstein scored the scene of the Hebrews leaving Egypt the way the film was shot: Long slow shots of slow people moving slowly. Cecil B. DeMille told him this was wrong and he wanted something fast and with energy.

Then however many years later when Bernstein scored The Magnificent Seven he applied the same lesson to the scenes of the Seven traveling to the village. Slow moving horses, fast moving score.

Of course 1) This is one of my favorite scores of all time and 2) Robert Wise was not exactly cast against type here. Even The Sound of Music (and certainly West Side Story) are very shall we say casually paced films. The Andromeda Strain? Forget about it!
...I mean, if we want to talk about how score can impact a film's perceived pacing, we can just compare the E leaving drydock as shown in TMP versus TWOK. :p
 
...I mean, if we want to talk about how score can impact a film's perceived pacing, we can just compare the E leaving drydock as shown in TMP versus TWOK. :p
I thought about that but those would be two very different paced scenes even without music. But yes, Meyer wanted a much lighter scene and Horner gave him (mostly) much lighter music. IIRC he says that the TWOK version does not cram the scene down your throat.

Of course in the case of TWOK they aren't leaving dock for the first time in two years and they aren't riding out to save the Earth.
 
Chapter Eighteen - First Contact

It never occurred to me before: They never tell you what the message was that Intruder sent!

The Machine Planet equivalent of hailing frequencies, I would assume.



Also, was the same message sent to Epsilon Nine?

No doubt to both it and the Klingons, but neither of them could detect it because it was too fast for non-machine consciousnesses to register. (Although that raises the question of why the ships' and outpost's computers couldn't register it.)


The debate between Kirk, Spock, and Decker (Decker almost takes the function of the McCoy role) that is in the film does not happen here. Spock does not argue that a "warning" implies "compassion" which the Intruder does not have. There is no decision from Kirk against Decker's argument that this is an unwarranted gamble.
Maybe reflecting how much rewriting there was during filming of the final act, though the novel is pretty close to the final version, suggesting it was written late in the game.

I suppose the Intruder can scan and consider very rapidly. But what was it about grabbing Ilia that made the probe think "Oh. OK. This is enough. I can leave."

I've always figured it was trying to take Spock as a sample but Ilia took the bullet for him.


And this was not the case with the security guard that it grabbed. (I don't remember if the security guard being zapped is in the ABC cut. It's not in the theatrical, right?)

No guard zappy in the theatrical. I think it's in the ABC, and it's definitely in the Marvel Comics version.

David Gerrold has made the argument that I find an interesting "what if" that the score works against the film. The film is slow, the score is slow.

Blasphemy. Don't mess with the Goldsmith.


Of course 1) This is one of my favorite scores of all time and 2) Robert Wise was not exactly cast against type here. Even The Sound of Music (and certainly West Side Story) are very shall we say casually paced films. The Andromeda Strain? Forget about it!

Goes back to his start, Curse of the Cat People, which was a thoughtful, soulful exercise in surrealism in contrast to the horror film it was a sequel to. The Day the Earth Stood Still is pretty deliberate, though it has some lively sequences like the opening (Bernard Herrmann definitely took the "fast music" advice there).
 
I've always figured it was trying to take Spock as a sample but Ilia took the bullet for him.

I don't think so. It was trying to hurt Spock after he smashed the controls (Decker wasn't harmed when he tried to use the console at the same time as the probe, even though he clearly expected to be, so the attack on Spock was definitely deliberate), and when Spock tried to pull Ilia away from it after the probe started advancing on her, it zapped him away again.

It seemed to be Ilia trying to help Spock after the first time he was zapped that attracted the probe's attention. Maybe it clocked her empathic abilities then, and realized she could communicate directly with carbon units wirelessly the same way V'Ger could communicate with machines (and Spock).

No guard zappy in the theatrical. I think it's in the ABC, and it's definitely in the Marvel Comics version.

No, the guard attack has never been in any filmed version. The (surviving) guard is just suddenly there by the turbolift in the first shot looking towards the back of the bridge. The new DE did some touch-ups to try and fix the alignment between the left and right sides of the frame (on-set, a stage-hand was moving a powerful tube-light, so he'd stand on the left side of the light for one take, then they'd shoot another take of the scene with him standing on the right, and they cut the two shots together in a spit-screen, but the different takes didn't match as closely as they intended). It's still not perfect, but the misalignment is a lot less egregious than it used to be.
 
The new DE did some touch-ups to try and fix the alignment between the left and right sides of the frame (on-set, a stage-hand was moving a powerful tube-light, so he'd stand on the left side of the light for one take, then they'd shoot another take of the scene with him standing on the right, and they cut the two shots together in a spit-screen, but the different takes didn't match as closely as they intended). It's still not perfect, but the misalignment is a lot less egregious than it used to be.

The misalignment has always been one of the most obvious FX glitches, but I tended to rationalize it by thinking maybe the probe was creating an optical distortion in the air around it that warped the view of what was behind it.
 
There's actually more to the effect than that. IIRC they actually distorted the physical film.

@Scrooge McTall , does the book go into more detail about this, or discuss it at all? I always find it a bit humorous in the movie how Spock cuts off access to what is essentially a mainframe computer, by smashing the keyboard of one terminal. :lol:

This is the book:
Spock was in motion. Even as Kirk spoke, the Vulcan was locking his hands together overhead, and now he brought them down in a tremendous two-handed chop into the computer pedestal.

The entire face of the console shattered . . . bridge lights dimmed as the panel was shorted out.

Then:
The Deltan navigator Ilia was stepping past Spock, trying to distract the probe’s attention. She succeeded.
The probe was moving after Spock apparently for smashing his console. (Spock didn't want Franz Joseph Schnaubelt to get paid!) In the film it kicks Spock around more. But even in the book it says "a pinpoint green flash at the contact point sent the Vulcan spinning under the rail and down at Ilia’s feet."

On film Spock walks to stand behind the helm console which just happens to put Ilia between him and the probe. She doesn't try to distract the probe. Her role is far more passive. (She looks rather distressed to be where she is at.) It zaps her a few times without any effect and then it zaps Spock when he tries to grab her, knocking her away. It also holds off Decker.

Why is she holding a tricorder? She wasn't when the probe appeared. I think the first we see of it is when Spock lands at her feet. (He put his down on his chair.)

After all of Spock's interstellar contact with the Intruder, it scans Ilia a couple of times and decides "I can use this." Spock's just not having a good day.
 
On film Spock walks to stand behind the helm console which just happens to put Ilia between him and the probe. She doesn't try to distract the probe. Her role is far more passive.

Yes, the way it's staged and paced in the film is unclear, but I think that the scripted intent was that Ilia got in the way, intentionally or otherwise, when the probe went for Spock. That last line you quoted from the novel may be my source for that impression.

I just don't see how V'Ger would've seen anything distinctive about Ilia as opposed to any other "carbon unit" aboard. I mean, yeah, she's an empath, but Spock's a full telepath, so it would have no reason to favor her over him if that were a consideration. V'Ger wouldn't even comprehend what an empath is, since it has no concept that carbon units are living, sentient beings with emotional lives. So the only possible reason I can thnk of why Ilia would've been taken is that she was simply the one closest to the probe when it decided to take a sample.
 
I just don't see how V'Ger would've seen anything distinctive about Ilia as opposed to any other "carbon unit" aboard. I mean, yeah, she's an empath, but Spock's a full telepath, so it would have no reason to favor her over him if that were a consideration. V'Ger wouldn't even comprehend what an empath is, since it has no concept that carbon units are living, sentient beings with emotional lives. So the only possible reason I can thnk of why Ilia would've been taken is that she was simply the one closest to the probe when it decided to take a sample.
Looking at the scene on film to write these posts I see that the probe scans Ilia longer than anything else on the bridge other than Spock's library. She is the only person that it interacts with. (Other than the people it smacks away from Ilia.)

She is the closest after it discards Spock. In the book and the film it tosses Spock across the bridge rather than inspecting or taking him. And again, in the book at least, it is suggested that the consciousness has actually examined Spock before this. Perhaps it doesn't recognize him because it was not expecting this consciousness to be in a meat bag.

But no, it doesn't actually make a lot of sense. I suppose that the probe leaving with Ilia is almost a reaction of shock. "What is going on here? I need to take a different tack to figure out this weirdness."
 
It occurred to me to check the script. The version here seems to match the final film, even though its heading uses the 1978 date of a much earlier draft:

as Spock, in stepping back, accidentally brushes the
probe's energy tendril -- a FLASH OF LIGHT at the
contact point sends Spock sinning under the rail and
to the floor near Ilia. The probe's energy-tendril
has withdrawn from the darkened science console, hov-
ers high over the dazed Spock as if angrily seeking
the reason for the break in its computer contact.
Spock starts to rise.

ILIA
Mr. Spock, don't move...!

Decker steps toward her, AD LIBBING a grim "Ilia...!"
But he has no chance as:

211 OMITTED 211
- -
219 219

220 CLOSER ON ILIA (O) 220

The Probe hovers over her, its whole mass seemingly
about to envelope her with a single tendril extended
toward her, somehow freezing her into immobility -
and then the entire Probe DISSOLVES IN A BLINDING
FLASH OF WHITE, obscuring Ilia. Almost instantly
the WHITE FLASH FADES -- but Ilia has vanished -- her
tricorder clattering to the deck.
I would guess that those omitted scenes involved Ilia trying to come to Spock's rescue and getting in the way, since that seems to be the only way to interpret the sequence of events.

I have the impression that this was supposed to happen at a fast pace, but the nature of shooting the FX sequence slowed it down and so it just seems everyone's standing around weirdly for a few moments before anything happens, making the cause and effect harder to see. It's really a clumsily executed moment.

I have PDFs of a couple of early drafts of TMP from 1978, back when the Ilia probe was going to be called "Tasha." In those drafts, Ilia's abduction happened several scenes before V'Ger probed the ship's computers. In the May 17 draft, the (multiple) probes just arbitrarily focus on Ilia for no apparent reason. In the July 19 draft, the (single) probe is scanning the bridge consoles in general and happens to brush Ilia's hand by accident, whereupon it scans her thoroughly (the crew are able to intercept the data the probe is sending back) and then teleports her away. I guess they realized later it would work better to combine the two scenes and give Ilia more agency, in that she was trying to help Spock rather than just sitting there.

Also, in these early drafts, we learn the answer to your question of what message the intruder sent:
"V'Ger to Enterprise -- state intentions -- identify place of origin" repeated over and over. After Spock breaks the code (and after Ilia is taken), they answer the hail and have a dialogue revealing a lot of the stuff about V'Ger that the Ilia Probe reveals in the final film, and it leads into V'Ger hacking the ship's computer, then attacking the ship and dragging it inside after Spock breaks the link. I think the final version is much better, since actually talking to V'Ger so early gives away too much, and it works better when it comes through the Ilia Probe.
 
Last edited:
How does one ad lib a line written in the script? :vulcan:

Perhaps by being flexible about the timing or the exact phrasing, though I'm not sure how you could rephrase it.

There's a chance this could be a dialogue release script, an after-the-fact documentation of the final cut of the film including the unscripted changes during shooting/editing, but I'd have to review the whole thing to see if that was the case. Presumably even that would include a notation of the omitted scenes so that the scene numbering would be consistent.
 
Huh. I thought I posted this!

Chapter Nineteen - Tractor Beam
They make the connection that Ilia was not destroyed but may have been transported. There is immediate activity to try and contact the Intruder to tell them that this has happened.

In the film there is stunned silence and recrimination from Decker aimed at Kirk that he just got someone killed being a cowboy. In the book we have moved past this plot.

The main viewer showed that Sulu had the Enterprise still on a parallel course with the immense alien, keeping position at a full one hundred kilometers away—and even at this distance, the enormous bulk of the other vessel more than filled the big viewer screen.
100km away from Manhattan is somewhere in the neighborhood of Trenton NJ. Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think Manhattan fills the horizon of Trenton. If the viewer is on magnification then it's kind of a pointless reference.

Kirk struggled to think clearly and consecutively about all this. Had they angered the aliens when Spock shorted out the probe’s examination of Enterprise’s computer library? Possibly, but Kirk doubted that the plasma-energy probe left for that reason, or that it snatched up Ilia out of pique. It was maddening to be uncertain of everything when the Intruders were clearly able to communicate with the Enterprise had they wished to do so.
Kirk is asking the same questions we were!

When the Intruder pulls the Enterprise in Kirk makes an announcement to the crew. What a very Star Trek detail that is missing from the films!

This chapter feels like a Blish adaptation: All the details are there but the dialog and the emphasis is all very different. I like it, sure, but it's amazing to see GR make Star Trek: The Motion Picture feel even more formal.

Kirk gave her an approving glance, searching for the name—yes, DiFalco. There might be something about her worth remembering.
"I'm gonna marry that girl!"

Spock hurried to his science console. It seemed probable to both of them that the aliens would certainly understand their being curious about where they were being taken.
"Dammit. My console is all smashed!"

This sequence is missing the exchanges between Decker and Spock about if they should try to escape with Decker wondering why Spock is opposed to trying, along with Kirk and McCoy exchanging worried glances about Spock's motives. This subplot, at least so far, is getting downplayed. Not as much as the Run Silent, Run Deep Kirk / Decker subplot which seems to have been eliminated.

GR puts the officer's quarters on deck four. The film puts them on deck five in keeping with Kirk and Spock's quarters being on deck five from The Making of Star Trek.

What happens to a quarters sized volume of air when it reaches 1000 degrees? (Celsius, presumably.) I would imagine stuff would happen.



I think the final version is much better, since actually talking to V'Ger so early gives away too much, and it works better when it comes through the Ilia Probe.
I'm sure you're right. But in the film and the book we're left with the fact that the Enterprise has received the only direct communication from the Intruder until now and they never bother to look at it or mention it again.

How does one ad lib a line written in the script? :vulcan:
I just ignored that part. :)
 
But in the film and the book we're left with the fact that the Enterprise has received the only direct communication from the Intruder until now and they never bother to look at it or mention it again.

Spock must have read it, since that's how he knew the signal was an attempt at communication. But even in the earlier drafts, it was nothing but a hail and a request to identify. We can presume it was the same in the final version, except probably without the silly "V'Ger to Enterprise" bit. The message Spock sent back that got V'Ger to halt its attack was no doubt an answer to the identification request. So there was nothing more to look at or mention. The exchange was completed, and had served its purpose.
 
Spock must have read it, since that's how he knew the signal was an attempt at communication.

The last we heard of it:
“Frequency more than one million megahertz,” Spock was saying rapidly. “At such speed, their entire message lasted only a millisecond.”

“No time now to translate their message,” said Decker.

“We will repeat our standard linguacode signal,” said Spock. “Now programming to send it at their transmission speed.”
On reflection it actually seems out of character for the Intruder to attempt to communicate since it never attempts such direct communication again. In the film this contradiction is addressed in dialog. Kirk, Spock, and Decker discuss that they have no idea why the attack was broken off. And we never really get an answer, either.

It was going to destroy the ship when its hails went unanswered. Yet once it decides not to destroy the ship it doesn't attempt a dialog either.

GR does a fairly good job at describing the complexity and immensity, but this is where the film excels IMO. The sheer alienness was beautifully visualized.
Breaking into the three sections: The cloud is pretty but goes on too long. The exterior is gorgeous but doesn't give us a proper sense of scale until it swtiches from the Enterprise's POV to actually seeing the ship next to the vessel. Then the scenes with the Enterprise being pulled into the interior are jaw dropping and finally pay off the long shots of the ship at the beginning of the film.

IMHO of course.
 
On reflection it actually seems out of character for the Intruder to attempt to communicate since it never attempts such direct communication again. In the film this contradiction is addressed in dialog. Kirk, Spock, and Decker discuss that they have no idea why the attack was broken off. And we never really get an answer, either.

It was going to destroy the ship when its hails went unanswered. Yet once it decides not to destroy the ship it doesn't attempt a dialog either.

V'Ger's mission is to "learn all that is learnable." When it encounters something new, it sends out a hail to see if it shows signs of intelligence. If it doesn't answer the hail, then it's just a routine item to be catalogued, so V'Ger destructively digitizes it and stores its data. If it does answer, V'Ger instead tractor-beams it inside and sends a probe to examine it, gaining baseline data and collecting samples. It uses the information thus gained to proceed to the next stage, opening communication. V'Ger did indeed attempt a dialogue; that was the entire purpose for which the Ilia Probe was created. It just went through the preliminary steps first, like a scientist collecting and analyzing a new specimen. After all, V'Ger is a science probe at heart.
 
As gorgeous as TMP is, I get the sense that Roddenberry is describing a much larger complex that what we see in the film.
One of these days—someone will put this whole novel into AI to see what it comes up with.

Did Gene ever draw spaceship ideas?
The billion ton super-spacer comes to mind.

With regards to post 161…I can imagine a lot of unused space between hulls

 
Last edited:
If it does answer V'Ger instead tractor-beams it inside and sends a probe to examine it, gaining baseline data and collecting samples.

If it answers and then makes its way through Vejur's force field.
 
Last edited:

Please don't alter my quoted text without my consent. You are not my editor.

I also don't understand what point you think you're making. It's an utterly trivial detail that doesn't alter the process I've described in any significant way. V'Ger's goal was to analyze the ship more closely, and since the ship was already approaching it anyway, it simply allowed it to. I misspoke in putting the tractor beam before the plasma probe, but the basic motivation is the same: it's gathering information step by step, and once it has enough, it attempts communication by creating the Ilia Probe.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top