• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

What are your controversial Star Trek opinions?

I don't think anyone has ever claimed that only one person should've ever played Romeo.
It's the same principle.
The way I see it, you don't recast Christian Bale for the Christian Bale Batman films, you don't recast Tom Holland for the Tom Holland Spider-Man films, and the Star Trek Prime Universe is the William Shatner universe. There's also a Chris Pine Star Trek Universe and that's good too.
You can and it has been done.

Non-issue.
 
The way I see it, you don't recast Christian Bale for the Christian Bale Batman films, you don't recast Tom Holland for the Tom Holland Spider-Man films, and the Star Trek Prime Universe is the William Shatner universe. There's also a Chris Pine Star Trek Universe and that's good too.
You don't recast Christian Bale for the Christian Bale movies, but there's only three of those and they're done. Robert Pattinson being the next Batman doesn't take away from Christian Bale, he only adds to the mythos, which is very broad ranging at this point.
 
James Bond, the movie series where even fans can't decide if it's the same person or a new guy using the same code name.
Yes, but that doesn't stop recasting.

Or, Batman after the first two Burton films. Then it was Kilmer then Clooney who were meant to be in the same continuity.

By and large, producers have trusted audience members to be adaptable, to track a long with some changes as part of the illusion of film. Maybe even buy in that physical productions have limits and things can change.

Obviously that illusion can go so far and can be broken depending on the changes. TMP to TWOK being my biggest one. Yet, I don't have that with recasting Saavik.

But recasting should always be a tool in a production a tool belt until money and talent become less limited resources.

And, if we treat Trek as a period piece recasting happens more because it isn't the original historical figure playing themselves.
 
James Bond, the movie series where even fans can't decide if it's the same person or a new guy using the same code name.
In my "Head Canon" for the James Bond 007 Franchise, "James Bond" was ALWAYS a code name that a "Elite MI5 Agent" assumed and took the mantle with each generation.

Since most people don't know who the real person behind "James Bond" really is, he has assets, name value, & clout around the world that allows him to infiltrate nearly anywhere due to his name existing throughout time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kkt
So, "put flowers on the grave of a woman you don't know" is in there?
Got to keep up the act, you know? As a spy you never know who is watching.

Rvytkon.jpg
 
Pine is a fine Kirk, but I am not sold on Wesley at all.
I think Chris Pine is okay for the type of Kirk he is, but it's not my thing. Paul Wesley looks like Dick York from Bewitched. All I can think of is Darren (okay, Jim Carrey too). And his acting, from what I saw, is way too flat.

To me, when I think of Kirk, it's still Shatner's Kirk. Though I keep Shatner's Kirk separate from William Shatner himself.

As far as James Bond:
Connery --> I like him as Bond. But (Controversial Opinion!) he's not my favorite.
Lazenby --> Nah.
Moore --> He grows on you.
Dalton --> No thanks.
Brosnan --> The perfect blend of Connery and Moore. Also, my first Bond.
Craig --> His Bond is a thug, IMO. I stopped watching his movies. I even watched all of Moore's.

So, yeah, another Controversial Opinion: Pierce Brosnan is my favorite James Bond.

Just to round this off and to prove my first isn't always my favorite: I like Robert Pattison better as Batman than Adam West, Michael Keaton, or Christian Bale. As far as live-action goes, the rest aren't even worth a mention.
 
Last edited:
The way I see it, you don't recast Christian Bale for the Christian Bale Batman films, you don't recast Tom Holland for the Tom Holland Spider-Man films, and the Star Trek Prime Universe is the William Shatner universe. There's also a Chris Pine Star Trek Universe and that's good too.
What if you recast, oh I don't know... Saavik in the middle of a storyline in a direct sequel?

Lazenby: worst Bond actor in the best Bond movie. And somehow he still works and comes off well.
Yep yep annnd yep!
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top