Like what?

But apparently the ‘17 years after line’ invalidates all this per-MA guidelines. I guess because it’s a newer fact.
Like what?
But apparently the ‘17 years after line’ invalidates all this per-MA guidelines. I guess because it’s a newer fact.
I realized that, if the show goes on long enough, they'll end up in a situation where an episode is going to be "The Gang Reacts to Space-9/11."
I think that's why they slowed the timeline. If they've spent three seasons in 2380-early 2381, then they're probably not going to get to 2385 before the end of the series.
On the other hand, Prodigy is currently in 2384. So it's more of a potential issue for that show than LD.
Isaac Asimov said that he only created the positronic brain in the 1930s because no known technology could serve as a robot brain. He later recognised that he had created a computer under another name.The point is, if there are already so many self-aware artilects in 2381, then it shouldn't even need to be "cracked" in the 2390s. Trek is too inconsistent about A.I. sentience, treating androids, holograms, and box-on-a-shelf computers as entirely separate categories. The outer appearance should be irrelevant to the question of the mind's sophistication. If you can create a sentient hologram just by giving a computer vague instructions or letting an EMH run unusually long, then you should just be able to download that hologram's software into an android body and boom, who needs a positronic brain?
I imagine the simplest solution to the lack of "holotronic" robots is that, even in the 24th century, the amount of computing hardware and sensors to make an interactive hologram function is just too physically large to fit into a human-sized body (or requires too much power). There's Moriarty's cube and the expansion device it was put into, sure, but that's an entirely self-contained simulation.
The mobile emitter is still 29th century. Suppose, you wouldn’t leave a 1980s car in the 1930s even though that era already had cars. Because the model itself is too advanced for an earlier time.
The novel DTI: Watching the Clock proposed that time agencies allowed certain temporal violations to happen because those would allow their realities to come to pass.
No, it's a simulated world plus two sentient AI consciousnesses, all fitting in that small device. So clearly just one AI consciousness could easily fit in a smaller device.
Besides, for whatever reason, the 29th-century Temporal Integrity Commission didn't confiscate the Doctor's mobile emitter when they tried to correct Voyager's temporal intervention. The only way that makes sense to me is if the TIC knew that the mobile emitter technology was going to be invented in the Federation before Voyager made it home, which would've been 2394 in the pre-"Endgame" timeline. So that means that by the time of Picard, there should already be commbadge-sized devices able to house a sentient AI mind.
The same Burn which happens two hundred years in their future?For a really funky timeline thought, the 29th century crew WERE going to retrieve the holoemitter but the Burn happened and they were prevented from doing so--which means that they can't retrieve it now due to the timeline "settling."
The same Burn which happens two hundred years in their future?
Today's Lower Decks episode has what is probably a coincidence but could be interpreted as a fun reference to how The Face of the Unknown interpreted "The Corbomite Maneuver".
The information broker whom Captain Freeman throttles is a real person with a design based on Balok's puppet. This could be a canonical version of the Dassik, having integrated into the galactic community.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.