But for a while, as TNG was wrapping up, there was development for GEN and DS9, with preliminary work for VOY as it would debut in January.
DS9 = 1993 (TNG season 6)
GEN = end of 1994 (written during TNG 7 and as some scripts get rewrites, even up to the time of episode filming)
VOY = January 1995 (had to have been written during TNG 7)
"All Good Things" had a final draft of 3/10/94 -
https://www.st-minutiae.com/resources/scripts/277.txt and
https://memory-alpha.fandom.com/wiki/All_Good_Things..._(episode)
GEN was written concurrently(
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/All_Good_Things..._(Star_Trek:_The_Next_Generation)#:~:text=Ronald D. Moore and Brannon Braga expected Michael,Generations, often confusing aspects of the two. )
"Caretaker" (aka "Hee Haw in Space") was completed in early-September, early drafts started in June:
https://memory-alpha.fandom.com/wiki/Caretaker_(episode)
A voyage begins…
them0vieblog.com
(there's a fun review, but I digress...)
In short, for TNG there was little if any overlap, but may have been for GEN and DS9.
Also,
Yee-haw! Now that's some good knee-slappin' and nose-pickin' Star Trek! (or any generic sci-fi...) The story just doesn't gel and seeing Tom getting turned on by a hologram to go make some potato and onion stew in the cellar really isn't exciting... well, for anyone who isn't a fictional character named Tom... bring in some of that corn and call it "succotash"...
Just read the description as well. Allegedly "upressed/uprezzed" in Topaz AI, it doesn't look much better than bog-standard SD, typical waxy characters with candly matted hair, play-doh barn sets and everything else, and the player is set to 1080 and the usual telltale signs are there... don't let the 560x320 thumbnail fool ya... they probably did too excessive sharpening settings along with overly-aggressive mpeg compression artifact cleanup, ideally less compression artifacting in the source is better but even then... fairly good deinterlacing, though, and pulldown can only fix so much as well and thanks to how film was transferred and edited back then and quality of DVD encode, some series fared worse with overlaid elements, never mind making sure the interlace fields matched up in sync, etc... but some frames did look like two adjacent fields were lumped in, hence a ghostly look, so pulldown and deinterlacing weren't perfect... better than icky patterns of horizontal lines that, when panned, make vertical structurs bend and wobbly in disconcerting ways... Now upscaling VT source material raw with low or no compression, Topaz fares much better. But A VT copy of film, with its grain and telecine added frames atop everything else? Nope, won't look anywhere near as good...