The Transporter is/war a terrible plot device conjured to save money that became far too important in Trek. They should have just used shuttles to get to the various planets.
Star Trek wouldn't be Star Trek, without the transporter.
The Transporter is/war a terrible plot device conjured to save money that became far too important in Trek. They should have just used shuttles to get to the various planets.
Seeing how humans, the bozos in Conundrum, & the weirdos in Schisms have all managed to wipe Data's memories, & in Thine Own Self he just accidentally loses memories, it doesn't seem much more difficult for his memory to get effected than anyone else's.Come to think of it, if Data couldn't be stunned, the most certain way to secure his silence probably would have been to damage Data in such a way he couldn't be repaired (and no memory files retrieved), and make it look like part of an accident as a result of the supposed wormhole encounter somehow.
But the Paxans seem to be greatly reluctant to actually kill/destroy (someone), despite all their talk.
Completely agreed, for all the reasons you stated.There's a thread on "scary" Trek moments, and I didn't think about it until we got into this about the transporter, but arguably one of the most chilling, disturbing and haunting moments in all of Star Trek involves the transporter in The Motion Picture and the "malfunction" that occurs.
The fact we don't see what Cronenberg-ish mess materialized on the pad back at Starfleet Command makes it even scarier, just that ungodly screaming wail and that it's described as not living long .. "fortunately."
Your imagination fills in the blanks and makes it so much worse.
Geordi pulls some of Data's memories in Insurrection & literally holds them in his hand, for Data to say "there they are". Soong pretty much wiped Data's whole childhood. Picard enters things into Data's memory in Times Arrow. Data's had his memory restored in both Conundrum & Thine Own Self. I'm probably forgetting more, but it doesn't seem to be a big leap that with Data's help, they could work out striking things from his memory if they wanted to IMHOAs for the Federation, I'm not sure they know enough of data's positronic brain to erase memories without causing other damage- they can't duplicate it either, after all.
Very true. I would think Data himself would be second to him in that knowledge, maybe even his equal, by the time he constructs Lal.^those are good examples, though of course Soong would know how to do much more than anyone else.
I think that was the point; to show how easily people can slide down that slippery slope.None of these things were 'defending their homes'. They went from actual freedom fighters to aggressive terrorists.
You are correctAnd that's it. Two whole years the Federation, Klingons etc. were actively exploring the other side of the wormhole, investigating everything even remotely interesting, and they didn't run into a single Dominion member world or Jem'Hadar ship. It seems like the Romulan and Klingon Empires must be closer to the wormhole than the Dominion is.
Despite what I’ve said about the transporter being iconic, I don’t know: The Orville doesn’t have one, but a lot of people still experience it as feeling very Trek. I could imagine a series set some years before Enterprise, with no transporter at all, still managing to feel like a Trek show.Star Trek wouldn't be Star Trek, without the transporter.
Remote Transporter Activation program uses Sensors to detect empty space and to align you far away from objects so that you don't end up fused in furniture or the bulk heads.But with the Discovery future personal transporters, how do I beam myself into the next room without possibly ending up fused with the furniture that I didn't realize was in the spot that I couldn't see was there before materializing?
Same with Stargate, and no I don't count the titular device as one. Atlantis used a shuttle all the time and it felt very Trek at times. Same with Stargate SG-1.Despite what I’ve said about the transporter being iconic, I don’t know: The Orville doesn’t have one, but a lot of people still experience it as feeling very Trek. I could imagine a series set some years before Enterprise, with no transporter at all, still managing to feel like a Trek show.
One other thing about the Maquis... I used to be on their side of things.
Until they started stealing and attacking places outside their home systems. They went from waging a defensive war to a full on offensive war. But these guts were just supposed to be defending their homes.
A list of things the Maquis did...
1. Stole the Defiant and destroyed a Cardassian outpost.
2. Stole a dozen Federation industrial replicators.
3. Stole materials from Federation convoys and used them to create a biological weapon and poisoned TWO Cardassian planets.
4. Attacked and crippled TWO Starfleet ships. (Defiant and Malinche.)
And these are just what has been said and shown on screen. None of these things were 'defending their homes'. They went from actual freedom fighters to aggressive terrorists.
The only thing on that list (and TBH I don't remember the episode) that would be terrorism would be poisoning the planets. Presumably civilian settlements. (That's the fun thing about sci-fi - You can do monstrously huge things but because of the scale it's just "Oh and that happened.")
But attacking military assets that would otherwise be used against you? That is definitionally defending your home. After the Cardassian aggression (whatever they called it) the Maquis went to war with Cardassia and then Cardassia enlisted the Federations aid and it was given.
I don't know the "geography" here. I guess this is all in DS9's back yard?
That makes two of us. I've always been very "meh" on it. Same for The Inner Light.My unpopular opinion... The Visitor is very overrated. I've never really liked it, and watching it again for the first time in ages it still does nothing for me.
I know it's hugely popular. Hugely. So I know I'm the odd one out. I really tried with it again. But it does nothing for me. I tried to understand why... and for me it's lack of consequence.
- Melanie is a nobody, I don't care about her as a plot device and she goes and she is of no importance.
- Sure older Jake kills himself, but he will live and his father and live... there's no consequence of that.
- I know reset buttons are a big Trek plot device but on this one, it reset and that's that.
- And I know they re-use actors a lot but this is Tony Todd. This is Kurn. I never really bought into him being Jake. And there's often a closer feeling between the real Jake and Ben in a scene in their quarters.
- The future scenes with the crew didn't feel compelling - TNG did better episodes featuring the crew in the future and it felt just a plot device.
I know it completely upends the feeling here, but personally I'm immediately reminded of the scene in Galaxy Quest.There's a thread on "scary" Trek moments, and I didn't think about it until we got into this about the transporter, but arguably one of the most chilling, disturbing and haunting moments in all of Star Trek involves the transporter in The Motion Picture and the "malfunction" that occurs.
The fact we don't see what Cronenberg-ish mess materialized on the pad back at Starfleet Command makes it even scarier, just that ungodly screaming wail and that it's described as not living long .. "fortunately."
Your imagination fills in the blanks and makes it so much worse.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.