After rewatching the episode I have mixed feelings.
^^this
Oddly enough, my pancake batter, comprised of wheat flour, rice flower, egg, egg substitute, mashed-up cauliflower, and bits of avocado blap purée, with blueberries and beets on top, also feels the same way.
I like that Scotty was brought back and the special appearance of James Doohan as guest star.
Doohan's acting is phenomenal.
The confrontation of the generations and of the old Enterprise with the new Enterprise.
Scotty was understandably hyper, but even a chief engineer would know not to act like a 7 year-old, or Dr Smith from Lost in Space, and go touching every control panel he sees.
To see that Scotty, even when it's not his time, still has it and in the end saves the Enterprise.
^^this. It makes up for a lot of the nitpicks.
What feels weird to me is that he stayed in this transport buffer for 75 years.
Without any failure (due in part to some redundant/backup systems, what's the MTBF of each one and how long is said ship expected to remain in service in the first place, et cetera... )
Even when it's just fiction, isn't it quite unreal? And when he gets out of it it's like he just stayed there for a few seconds.
He doesn't seemed harmed or affected in any way and takes it very easy that he is suddenly 75 years ahead.
Would one feel the passage of time if contained as an independent array of molecules? But 75 years, there should be something of a shock.
At least he's not Riker, but that plot demanded he figure out the imperfect future wasn't the real future. But I digress.
And in the end we learn that he will now spend the rest of his life in this future. It's the last thing we (so far) hear about Scotty's future story in Star Trek.
Somehow I'm not really happy wtih it, how it was told in this episode. And I can't really explain why...I guess it's just not satisfying and I expected something else.
Wasn't he already headed to the Bayview retirement village, where he'd get bored by the anecdotes of Diana Trent and Tom Ballard?

Finally another question. Couldn't this technology, to keep somebody in the buffer for a long time without affects or aging, be used in some ways?
Easily. Sadly, as with "Unnatural Selection" and a few dozen episodes, it's all quietly forgotten because the makers knew it'd become a "get out of plot" card very quickly, as well as losing any special nature*. Thankfully, if the right sequel show were to be made, they could have a field day with all of this. Shame there's no season 6 of "Lower Decks", or any more "Prodigy" or "Discovery" either since all the remaining shows are prequels...
* like the warp core breach trope, using it once under tight constrained circumstances can be exciting. Used too frequently, it feels like a disservice to the story way too quickly and begs other questions - like the oft-asked "Why is the 1701-D infinitely more fragile than the original was?" For which the prevailing answer seems to be, "Because the original didn't have seven seasons, so there, piffle!"

Thank you for your opinions in advance.
Thank you for another great post!
