• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

What Litverse books are still consistent with the new shows?

Given the tremendous span of possibilities branching out from that point in young Picard's life, Q would've had his selection of what specific timeline to drop Picard-Prime into to demonstrate how it affected him down the line. Given his promise that no one else would be affected by Picard's change to history, he could've easily picked the one that most closely resembled the Prime timeline, even if it was a statistically unlikely or multiversally rare chain of events, without actively intervening and staging the situation artificially (though given Q's deal, creating a simulated history versus picking one out from a practically unlimited pool that fit his needs could be six of one and a half dozen of the other).
 
Given the tremendous span of possibilities branching out from that point in young Picard's life, Q would've had his selection of what specific timeline to drop Picard-Prime into to demonstrate how it affected him down the line. Given his promise that no one else would be affected by Picard's change to history, he could've easily picked the one that most closely resembled the Prime timeline, even if it was a statistically unlikely or multiversally rare chain of events, without actively intervening and staging the situation artificially (though given Q's deal, creating a simulated history versus picking one out from a practically unlimited pool that fit his needs could be six of one and a half dozen of the other).

Yeah, I never bought that Q was really as omnipotent as he claimed. Why assume a trickster is telling the truth? What possible reason is there to believe that any of the alternative realities he showed the crew were actually real rather than simulations? I mean, obviously Sherwood Forest wasn't real, so why assume the others were?

For that matter, don't forget, even "Tapestry" was ambiguous about whether any of it actually happened; the final scene had Picard wondering if it was a dream, because he couldn't believe Q would be so generous. So we have no proof any of it was real.
 
There's also, for instance, the DS9 guy with the transparent skull, Chef, Felix (who made Vic Fontaine) - I'm sure folks know this more in-depth then me. You get the idea!

Tin Man rules, though. Harry Groener is one of my favorite "hey, it's that guy!" actors. You know he was in Oppenheimer?
 
There's also, for instance, the DS9 guy with the transparent skull, Chef, Felix (who made Vic Fontaine) - I'm sure folks know this more in-depth then me. You get the idea!

Tin Man rules, though. Harry Groener is one of my favorite "hey, it's that guy!" actors. You know he was in Oppenheimer?

As a Buffy fan, him showing up in Oppenheimer was the most exciting part for me. Dude’s freaking awesome, but mostly does theater instead of film and TV. Seeing him was a huge surprise.

The other surprise was that the old dude that looked vaguely like David Krumholtz (Not David Krumholtz, if you will) turned out to deadass be David Krumholtz. I felt my mortality in that moment.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top